From patchwork Mon Jan 24 00:31:51 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Dan Williams X-Patchwork-Id: 12721331 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D59A9C433EF for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 00:31:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235327AbiAXAbx (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Jan 2022 19:31:53 -0500 Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:5351 "EHLO mga07.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231417AbiAXAbx (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Jan 2022 19:31:53 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1642984312; x=1674520312; h=subject:from:to:cc:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UOt1RmkH36sMFykRBR92PUgZMphO1zeepPOf4BuhQR4=; b=lw5Z9hV/DR753uobBjxFesoZl+xCaVF6ppgETRJ4tjtCQftbKtDXeBeo LrUVgxgxd9nHDc0MabramxDW4YffXVvwJ5lFCLbPzP1L783tiCFKVfFWZ sBQBEYrzrI/ILiuagA9m9oI45j6gJ/g9o1/WvIsRL99+M5ZntIReleup3 ItXfELNA5juOQGYvQHu5qlH/YiulUU1CTndVzIzluVnE6VngwKUkETmDG mdee7Tht1xdzCbdIZXarRvqqGRu8nh4ZUDNchlrxmywLDNzCaHg0/V/6C uBUJap3+w7GvTVEwMk5cTXxMfcnLF4207DPKv7ei8R83foYZqcTVRr7nO Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10236"; a="309256081" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,311,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="309256081" Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Jan 2022 16:31:51 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,311,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="478862961" Received: from dwillia2-desk3.jf.intel.com (HELO dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com) ([10.54.39.25]) by orsmga006-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Jan 2022 16:31:51 -0800 Subject: [PATCH v3 36/40] tools/testing/cxl: Mock dvsec_ranges() From: Dan Williams To: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 16:31:51 -0800 Message-ID: <164298431119.3018233.17175518196764977542.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <164298411792.3018233.7493009997525360044.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <164298411792.3018233.7493009997525360044.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: StGit/0.18-3-g996c MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org For test purposes, pretend that that CXL DVSEC ranges are not in active use and the device is ready CXL.mem operation. Signed-off-by: Dan Williams --- tools/testing/cxl/test/mem.c | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/cxl/test/mem.c b/tools/testing/cxl/test/mem.c index 36ef337c775c..b6b726eff3e2 100644 --- a/tools/testing/cxl/test/mem.c +++ b/tools/testing/cxl/test/mem.c @@ -248,6 +248,14 @@ static void label_area_release(void *lsa) vfree(lsa); } +static void mock_validate_dvsec_ranges(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds) +{ + struct cxl_endpoint_dvsec_info *info; + + info = &cxlds->info; + info->mem_enabled = true; +} + static int cxl_mock_mem_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; @@ -285,6 +293,8 @@ static int cxl_mock_mem_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (rc) return rc; + mock_validate_dvsec_ranges(cxlds); + cxlmd = devm_cxl_add_memdev(cxlds); if (IS_ERR(cxlmd)) return PTR_ERR(cxlmd);