From patchwork Thu Jun 20 02:58:56 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Duan, Zhenzhong" X-Patchwork-Id: 13704831 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39D2421103; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 03:02:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718852523; cv=none; b=DdcV6RFg2GOwRl2ia9BZo4nqFIdiduibET1P1SEpwd9Aae0aTGDNg0XoqYIU17kiGovSTaPObiNMf4HqDX41s7n6ZIlShK5m5gP2ZDyxPGBibLVlz5WARxnB4IiXI4ikCVTaVaxhQTpw7FVo4LObMIXeFSFfj1JFb1xkSVGgjZ8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718852523; c=relaxed/simple; bh=szjKvtLWDlWuicIrgp0M0snw8AeRloi5Om3LsrAPWrQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=roGkwgbIaNu29auqHctwgtnfrnqSR5mN0YpFlMLJReF9NXOSq5JAxPb1EEk46LDM6OZ5mJJtGTE3+NKTP9XdICRwW40HVazEhhooR8sPfaPn+fvVpw7D1Ce0g102SsxHQUn74LO2/q3/Mln+UGee3t6ajqZ/eCqNjhBHbgxnC/I= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=amd2GFj1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="amd2GFj1" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1718852521; x=1750388521; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=szjKvtLWDlWuicIrgp0M0snw8AeRloi5Om3LsrAPWrQ=; b=amd2GFj1uNijjxy5gES9SyX7MvlVaGsL4cUbXUvZnHmcscPRp4TV2SIG B+YGFe6ooBM+8ZtaybwliqOjiU3sG4FQSBYLkrN5YkI9BDrPXeumYpm82 pfe4BQrWAeUU1yon8ZIxzjCLlZAGFP/yAmSnTby8vCYBA52VuWaGz1Hl6 MIVlkbz7Jz2EBT3Cy9VXuAHiQi36C6Qi5M02KgGHlVyW5Agv4M8UWjqqn xeDauMazRShxjXWU0i+nVRrBxWDOWAsECwq3OF9PUmXSKx1eeMtyzYtgF 5lMOtRcqsXlSIKAbEILbtJD1JSUHbEaA5QX1SNYlgwZaJG32pCADEFwwS g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: G0/QW+bVQqiWT5Ws3sztQg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: JOcvqUh6SbOYEUdgyREdhA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11108"; a="26444215" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,251,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="26444215" Received: from fmviesa008.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.148]) by fmvoesa105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Jun 2024 20:02:00 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: TA1DXNCCRGqxksTZ88vmMg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: PBx9D7NhSg2GtpwIqsGAGQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,251,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="42049416" Received: from unknown (HELO SPR-S2600BT.bj.intel.com) ([10.240.192.127]) by fmviesa008-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Jun 2024 20:01:52 -0700 From: Zhenzhong Duan To: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, mahesh@linux.ibm.com, oohall@gmail.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com, tony.luck@intel.com, bp@alien8.de, dave@stgolabs.net, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, dave.jiang@intel.com, alison.schofield@intel.com, vishal.l.verma@intel.com, ira.weiny@intel.com, helgaas@kernel.org, linmiaohe@huawei.com, shiju.jose@huawei.com, adam.c.preble@intel.com, lukas@wunner.de, Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com, rrichter@amd.com, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, erwin.tsaur@intel.com, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@intel.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, feiting.wanyan@intel.com, yudong.wang@intel.com, chao.p.peng@intel.com, qingshun.wang@linux.intel.com, Zhenzhong Duan , Jonathan Cameron , Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan Subject: [PATCH v5 1/2] PCI/AER: Clear UNCOR_STATUS bits that might be ANFE Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 10:58:56 +0800 Message-Id: <20240620025857.206647-2-zhenzhong.duan@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240620025857.206647-1-zhenzhong.duan@intel.com> References: <20240620025857.206647-1-zhenzhong.duan@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 In some cases the detector of a Non-Fatal Error(NFE) is not the most appropriate agent to determine the type of the error. For example, when software performs a configuration read from a non-existent device or Function, completer will send an ERR_NONFATAL Message. On some platforms, ERR_NONFATAL results in a System Error, which breaks normal software probing. Advisory Non-Fatal Error(ANFE) is a special case that can be used in above scenario. It is predominantly determined by the role of the detecting agent (Requester, Completer, or Receiver) and the specific error. In such cases, an agent with AER signals the NFE (if enabled) by sending an ERR_COR Message as an advisory to software, instead of sending ERR_NONFATAL. When processing an ANFE, ideally both correctable error(CE) status and uncorrectable error(UE) status should be cleared. However, there is no way to fully identify the UE associated with ANFE. Even worse, Non-Fatal Error(NFE) may set the same UE status bit as ANFE. Treating an ANFE as NFE will reproduce above mentioned issue, i.e., breaking software probing; treating NFE as ANFE will make us ignore some UEs which need active recover operation. To avoid clearing UEs that are not ANFE by accident, the most conservative route is taken here: If any of the NFE Detected bits is set in Device Status, do not touch UE status, they should be cleared later by the UE handler. Otherwise, a specific set of UEs that may be raised as ANFE according to the PCIe specification will be cleared if their corresponding severity is Non-Fatal. To achieve above purpose, cache UNCOR_STATUS bits that might be ANFE in aer_err_info.anfe_status and clean them in pci_aer_handle_error(). aer_err_info.anfe_status will also be used to print ANFE related bits in following patch. For instance, previously, when the kernel receives an ANFE with Poisoned TLP in OS native AER mode, only the status of CE will be reported and cleared: AER: Correctable error message received from 0000:b7:02.0 PCIe Bus Error: severity=Correctable, type=Transaction Layer, (Receiver ID) device [8086:0db0] error status/mask=00002000/00000000 [13] NonFatalErr If the kernel receives a Malformed TLP after that, two UEs will be reported, which is unexpected. The Malformed TLP Header is lost since the previous ANFE gated the TLP header logs: PCIe Bus Error: severity="Uncorrectable (Fatal), type=Transaction Layer, (Receiver ID) device [8086:0db0] error status/mask=00041000/00180020 [12] TLP (First) [18] MalfTLP To handle this case properly, calculate potential ANFE related status bits and save in aer_err_info. Use this information to determine the status bits that need to be cleared. Now, for the previous scenario, both CE status and related UE status will be cleared after ANFE: AER: Correctable error message received from 0000:b7:02.0 PCIe Bus Error: severity=Correctable, type=Transaction Layer, (Receiver ID) device [8086:0db0] error status/mask=00002000/00000000 [13] NonFatalErr PCIe Bus Error: severity="Uncorrectable (Fatal), type=Transaction Layer, (Receiver ID) device [8086:0db0] error status/mask=00040000/00180020 [18] MalfTLP (First) Tested-by: Yudong Wang Co-developed-by: "Wang, Qingshun" Signed-off-by: "Wang, Qingshun" Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan --- drivers/pci/pci.h | 1 + drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h index fd44565c4756..b889a6204db0 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/pci.h +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h @@ -410,6 +410,7 @@ struct aer_err_info { unsigned int status; /* COR/UNCOR Error Status */ unsigned int mask; /* COR/UNCOR Error Mask */ + unsigned int anfe_status; /* UNCOR Error Status for ANFE */ struct pcie_tlp_log tlp; /* TLP Header */ }; diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c index ac6293c24976..3dcfa0191169 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c @@ -107,6 +107,12 @@ struct aer_stats { PCI_ERR_ROOT_MULTI_COR_RCV | \ PCI_ERR_ROOT_MULTI_UNCOR_RCV) +#define AER_ERR_ANFE_UNC_MASK (PCI_ERR_UNC_POISON_TLP | \ + PCI_ERR_UNC_COMP_TIME | \ + PCI_ERR_UNC_COMP_ABORT | \ + PCI_ERR_UNC_UNX_COMP | \ + PCI_ERR_UNC_UNSUP) + static int pcie_aer_disable; static pci_ers_result_t aer_root_reset(struct pci_dev *dev); @@ -1094,9 +1100,14 @@ static void pci_aer_handle_error(struct pci_dev *dev, struct aer_err_info *info) * Correctable error does not need software intervention. * No need to go through error recovery process. */ - if (aer) + if (aer) { pci_write_config_dword(dev, aer + PCI_ERR_COR_STATUS, info->status); + if (info->anfe_status) + pci_write_config_dword(dev, + aer + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_STATUS, + info->anfe_status); + } if (pcie_aer_is_native(dev)) { struct pci_driver *pdrv = dev->driver; @@ -1196,6 +1207,53 @@ void aer_recover_queue(int domain, unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn, EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(aer_recover_queue); #endif +static void anfe_get_uc_status(struct pci_dev *dev, struct aer_err_info *info) +{ + u32 uncor_mask, uncor_status, anfe_status; + u16 device_status; + int aer = dev->aer_cap; + + /* + * To avoid race between device status read and error status register read, + * cache uncorrectable error status before checking for NFE in device status + * register. + */ + pci_read_config_dword(dev, aer + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_STATUS, &uncor_status); + pci_read_config_dword(dev, aer + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_MASK, &uncor_mask); + /* + * According to PCIe Base Specification Revision 6.1 Section 6.2.3.2.4, + * if an UNCOR error is raised as Advisory Non-Fatal error, it will + * match the following conditions: + * a. The severity of the error is Non-Fatal. + * b. The error is one of the following: + * 1. Poisoned TLP (Section 6.2.3.2.4.3) + * 2. Completion Timeout (Section 6.2.3.2.4.4) + * 3. Completer Abort (Section 6.2.3.2.4.1) + * 4. Unexpected Completion (Section 6.2.3.2.4.5) + * 5. Unsupported Request (Section 6.2.3.2.4.1) + */ + anfe_status = uncor_status & ~uncor_mask & ~info->severity & + AER_ERR_ANFE_UNC_MASK; + + if (pcie_capability_read_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVSTA, &device_status)) + return; + /* + * Take the most conservative route here. If there are Non-Fatal errors + * detected, do not assume any bit in uncor_status is set by ANFE. + */ + if (device_status & PCI_EXP_DEVSTA_NFED) + return; + + /* + * If there is another ANFE between reading uncor_status and clearing + * PCI_ERR_COR_ADV_NFAT bit in cor_status register, that ANFE isn't + * recorded in info->anfe_status. It will be read out as NFE in + * following uncor_status register reading and processed by NFE + * handler. + */ + info->anfe_status = anfe_status; +} + /** * aer_get_device_error_info - read error status from dev and store it to info * @dev: pointer to the device expected to have a error record @@ -1213,6 +1271,7 @@ int aer_get_device_error_info(struct pci_dev *dev, struct aer_err_info *info) /* Must reset in this function */ info->status = 0; + info->anfe_status = 0; info->tlp_header_valid = 0; /* The device might not support AER */ @@ -1226,6 +1285,9 @@ int aer_get_device_error_info(struct pci_dev *dev, struct aer_err_info *info) &info->mask); if (!(info->status & ~info->mask)) return 0; + + if (info->status & PCI_ERR_COR_ADV_NFAT) + anfe_get_uc_status(dev, info); } else if (type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT || type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_EC || type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM ||