Message ID | 54B00D36.7070707@gigawatt.nl (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Rejected |
Delegated to: | Herbert Xu |
Headers | show |
On 01/09/2015 10:17 AM, Harald van Dijk wrote: > Hello all, > > A long-standing problem with dash has been how it deals with variable > assignments in function invocations, and several packages are affected > by it, two I've come across recently being autogen and pkg-config (only > their test suites, luckily). > > A short test script: > > f() { > echo inside f, VAR is $VAR > sh -c 'echo inside sh called from f, VAR is $VAR' > } > > VAR=value f This behavior is tricky. Here's the latest POSIX wording: http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=654#c1559 * If the command name is a function that is not a standard utility implemented as a function, variable assignments shall affect the current execution environment during the execution of the function. It is unspecified: - Whether or not the variable assignments persist after the completion of the function - Whether or not the variables gain the export attribute during the execution of the function - Whether or not export attributes gained as a result of the variable assignments persist after the completion of the function (if variable assignments persist after the completion of the function) So the existing dash behavior is compliant, even if different from bash. > > Quoting SUSv4 Shell Command Language 2.9.1 Simple Commands: > > If no command name results, variable assignments shall affect the > current execution environment. Otherwise, the variable assignments > shall be exported for the execution environment of the command and > shall not affect the current execution environment (except for > special built-ins). This is the text that was rendered obsolete by the above POSIX bug 654. > Fixing this seems trivial, see the attachment, and the test suites of > both autogen and pkg-config pass with this change. Does this look correct? I have no opinion on whether to take the patch in order to behave more like bash, or whether to tell script-writers to fix their script to avoid unspecified behavior because dash is already compliant in providing a different behavior than bash.
On 09/01/2015 18:39, Eric Blake wrote: > On 01/09/2015 10:17 AM, Harald van Dijk wrote: >> A short test script: >> >> f() { >> echo inside f, VAR is $VAR >> sh -c 'echo inside sh called from f, VAR is $VAR' >> } >> >> VAR=value f > > This behavior is tricky. Here's the latest POSIX wording: > http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=654#c1559 > [...] > So the existing dash behavior is compliant, even if different from bash. Thank you for the reference! I wasn't aware that the wording has since changed. > I have no opinion on whether to take the patch in order to behave more > like bash, or whether to tell script-writers to fix their script to > avoid unspecified behavior because dash is already compliant in > providing a different behavior than bash. Well, perhaps it was already compliant, perhaps it became compliant by changing the standard, but either way, it is compliant now. :) If either behaviour is allowed, then I believe dash aims to avoid breaking changes. Existing scripts written for dash could conceivably rely on the current behaviour, so without any real benefit, my patch would be a bad idea. bash compatibility is usually not considered a big benefit for dash, POSIX compatibility is. Because of that, I withdraw my patch. Cheers, Harald van Dijk -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dash" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 1/9/15 12:39 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > This behavior is tricky. Here's the latest POSIX wording: > http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=654#c1559 The currently-published standard (as far as I know, I7 TC1 has not been published yet) requires the dash behavior. Bash implements it in Posix mode. Both shells will remain conformant when TC1 comes out. See http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html#tag_18_09_05 which includes "When a function is executed, it shall have the syntax-error and variable- assignment properties described for special built-in utilities in the enumerated list at the beginning of Special Built-In Utilities." - -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU chet@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAlSwLaYACgkQu1hp8GTqdKsSTgCfaLS1d4s/Mtr56BRVmiO37rDj MooAnRQZ50E86M/xLRsngYRe33fDCxFa =jlKx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dash" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--- a/src/eval.c +++ b/src/eval.c @@ -875,7 +875,7 @@ raise: break; case CMDFUNCTION: - poplocalvars(1); + listsetvar(varlist.list, VEXPORT|VSTACK); if (evalfun(cmdentry.u.func, argc, argv, flags)) goto raise; break;