Message ID | 20240320145417.336208-1-visitorckw@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | treewide: Refactor heap related implementation | expand |
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 10:54:02PM +0800, Kuan-Wei Chiu wrote: > This patch series focuses on several adjustments related to heap > implementation. Firstly, a type-safe interface has been added to the > min_heap, along with the introduction of several new functions to > enhance its functionality. Additionally, the heap implementation for > bcache and bcachefs has been replaced with the generic min_heap > implementation from include/linux. Furthermore, several typos have been > corrected. looks like something's busted: https://evilpiepirate.org/~testdashboard/ci?branch=refactor-heap
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 03:57:59PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote: > On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 10:54:02PM +0800, Kuan-Wei Chiu wrote: > > This patch series focuses on several adjustments related to heap > > implementation. Firstly, a type-safe interface has been added to the > > min_heap, along with the introduction of several new functions to > > enhance its functionality. Additionally, the heap implementation for > > bcache and bcachefs has been replaced with the generic min_heap > > implementation from include/linux. Furthermore, several typos have been > > corrected. > > looks like something's busted: > > https://evilpiepirate.org/~testdashboard/ci?branch=refactor-heap Oh...That's horrible. I apologize for the error in the patch I sent. As I am relatively new to bcache and bcachefs, I would like to ask if you have any suggestions on how I can conduct comprehensive testing locally, similar to the CI process you use. This way, I can ensure that patches are thoroughly tested before next submission. Regards, Kuan-Wei