| Message ID | 1711657047-10526-4-git-send-email-wufan@linux.microsoft.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded, archived |
| Delegated to: | Mike Snitzer |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Integrity Policy Enforcement LSM (IPE) | expand |
On Thu Mar 28, 2024 at 10:17 PM EET, Fan Wu wrote: > From: Deven Bowers <deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com> > > IPE must have a centralized function to evaluate incoming callers > against IPE's policy. This iteration of the policy for against the rules > for that specific caller is known as the evaluation loop. > > Signed-off-by: Deven Bowers <deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com> > Signed-off-by: Fan Wu <wufan@linux.microsoft.com> > > --- > v2: > + Split evaluation loop, access control hooks, and evaluation loop from policy parser and userspace interface to pass mailing list character limit > > v3: > + Move ipe_load_properties to patch 04. > + Remove useless 0-initializations Prefix extern variables with ipe_ > + Remove kernel module parameters, as these are exposed through sysctls. > + Add more prose to the IPE base config option help text. > + Use GFP_KERNEL for audit_log_start. > + Remove unnecessary caching system. > + Remove comments from headers > + Use rcu_access_pointer for rcu-pointer null check > + Remove usage of reqprot; use prot only. > +Move policy load and activation audit event to 03/12 > > v4: > + Remove sysctls in favor of securityfs nodes > + Re-add kernel module parameters, as these are now exposed through securityfs. > + Refactor property audit loop to a separate function. > > v5: > + fix minor grammatical errors > + do not group rule by curly-brace in audit record, > + reconstruct the exact rule. > > v6: > + No changes > > v7: > + Further split lsm creation into a separate commit from the evaluation loop and audit system, for easier review. > + Propagating changes to support the new ipe_context structure in the evaluation loop. > > v8: > + Remove ipe_hook enumeration; hooks can be correlated via syscall record. > > v9: > + Remove ipe_context related code and simplify the evaluation loop. > > v10: > + Split eval part and boot_verified part > > v11: > + Fix code style issues > > v12: > + Correct an rcu_read_unlock usage > + Add a WARN to unknown op during evaluation > > v13: > + No changes > > v14: > + No changes > > v15: > + No changes > > v16: > + No changes > --- > security/ipe/Makefile | 1 + > security/ipe/eval.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > security/ipe/eval.h | 24 ++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 125 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 security/ipe/eval.c > create mode 100644 security/ipe/eval.h > > diff --git a/security/ipe/Makefile b/security/ipe/Makefile > index c09aec4904f2..57fe922cf1fc 100644 > --- a/security/ipe/Makefile > +++ b/security/ipe/Makefile > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ > # > > obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_IPE) += \ > + eval.o \ > ipe.o \ > policy.o \ > policy_parser.o \ > diff --git a/security/ipe/eval.c b/security/ipe/eval.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..af56815ed0fa > --- /dev/null > +++ b/security/ipe/eval.c > @@ -0,0 +1,100 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +/* > + * Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. > + */ > + > +#include <linux/fs.h> > +#include <linux/types.h> > +#include <linux/slab.h> > +#include <linux/file.h> > +#include <linux/sched.h> > +#include <linux/rcupdate.h> > + > +#include "ipe.h" > +#include "eval.h" > +#include "policy.h" > + > +struct ipe_policy __rcu *ipe_active_policy; > + > +/** > + * evaluate_property - Analyze @ctx against a property. > + * @ctx: Supplies a pointer to the context to be evaluated. > + * @p: Supplies a pointer to the property to be evaluated. > + * > + * Return: > + * * true - The current @ctx match the @p > + * * false - The current @ctx doesn't match the @p > + */ > +static bool evaluate_property(const struct ipe_eval_ctx *const ctx, > + struct ipe_prop *p) What a descriptive name (not) Also short descriptino tells absolute nothing relevant (as good as it did not exist at all). It would be also senseful to carry the prefix. > +{ > + return false; > +} > + > +/** > + * ipe_evaluate_event - Analyze @ctx against the current active policy. > + * @ctx: Supplies a pointer to the context to be evaluated. > + * > + * This is the loop where all policy evaluation happens against IPE policy. > + * > + * Return: > + * * 0 - OK > + * * -EACCES - @ctx did not pass evaluation. > + * * !0 - Error > + */ > +int ipe_evaluate_event(const struct ipe_eval_ctx *const ctx) > +{ > + bool match = false; > + enum ipe_action_type action; > + struct ipe_policy *pol = NULL; > + const struct ipe_rule *rule = NULL; > + const struct ipe_op_table *rules = NULL; > + struct ipe_prop *prop = NULL; > + > + rcu_read_lock(); > + > + pol = rcu_dereference(ipe_active_policy); > + if (!pol) { > + rcu_read_unlock(); > + return 0; > + } > + > + if (ctx->op == IPE_OP_INVALID) { > + if (pol->parsed->global_default_action == IPE_ACTION_DENY) { > + rcu_read_unlock(); > + return -EACCES; > + } > + if (pol->parsed->global_default_action == IPE_ACTION_INVALID) > + WARN(1, "no default rule set for unknown op, ALLOW it"); > + rcu_read_unlock(); > + return 0; > + } > + > + rules = &pol->parsed->rules[ctx->op]; > + > + list_for_each_entry(rule, &rules->rules, next) { > + match = true; > + > + list_for_each_entry(prop, &rule->props, next) { > + match = evaluate_property(ctx, prop); > + if (!match) > + break; > + } > + > + if (match) > + break; > + } > + > + if (match) > + action = rule->action; > + else if (rules->default_action != IPE_ACTION_INVALID) > + action = rules->default_action; > + else > + action = pol->parsed->global_default_action; > + > + rcu_read_unlock(); > + if (action == IPE_ACTION_DENY) > + return -EACCES; > + > + return 0; > +} > diff --git a/security/ipe/eval.h b/security/ipe/eval.h > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..6b434515968f > --- /dev/null > +++ b/security/ipe/eval.h > @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ > +/* > + * Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. > + */ > + > +#ifndef _IPE_EVAL_H > +#define _IPE_EVAL_H > + > +#include <linux/file.h> > +#include <linux/types.h> > + > +#include "policy.h" > + > +extern struct ipe_policy __rcu *ipe_active_policy; > + > +struct ipe_eval_ctx { > + enum ipe_op_type op; > + > + const struct file *file; > +}; > + > +int ipe_evaluate_event(const struct ipe_eval_ctx *const ctx); > + > +#endif /* _IPE_EVAL_H */ BR, Jarkko
diff --git a/security/ipe/Makefile b/security/ipe/Makefile index c09aec4904f2..57fe922cf1fc 100644 --- a/security/ipe/Makefile +++ b/security/ipe/Makefile @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ # obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_IPE) += \ + eval.o \ ipe.o \ policy.o \ policy_parser.o \ diff --git a/security/ipe/eval.c b/security/ipe/eval.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..af56815ed0fa --- /dev/null +++ b/security/ipe/eval.c @@ -0,0 +1,100 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. + */ + +#include <linux/fs.h> +#include <linux/types.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> +#include <linux/file.h> +#include <linux/sched.h> +#include <linux/rcupdate.h> + +#include "ipe.h" +#include "eval.h" +#include "policy.h" + +struct ipe_policy __rcu *ipe_active_policy; + +/** + * evaluate_property - Analyze @ctx against a property. + * @ctx: Supplies a pointer to the context to be evaluated. + * @p: Supplies a pointer to the property to be evaluated. + * + * Return: + * * true - The current @ctx match the @p + * * false - The current @ctx doesn't match the @p + */ +static bool evaluate_property(const struct ipe_eval_ctx *const ctx, + struct ipe_prop *p) +{ + return false; +} + +/** + * ipe_evaluate_event - Analyze @ctx against the current active policy. + * @ctx: Supplies a pointer to the context to be evaluated. + * + * This is the loop where all policy evaluation happens against IPE policy. + * + * Return: + * * 0 - OK + * * -EACCES - @ctx did not pass evaluation. + * * !0 - Error + */ +int ipe_evaluate_event(const struct ipe_eval_ctx *const ctx) +{ + bool match = false; + enum ipe_action_type action; + struct ipe_policy *pol = NULL; + const struct ipe_rule *rule = NULL; + const struct ipe_op_table *rules = NULL; + struct ipe_prop *prop = NULL; + + rcu_read_lock(); + + pol = rcu_dereference(ipe_active_policy); + if (!pol) { + rcu_read_unlock(); + return 0; + } + + if (ctx->op == IPE_OP_INVALID) { + if (pol->parsed->global_default_action == IPE_ACTION_DENY) { + rcu_read_unlock(); + return -EACCES; + } + if (pol->parsed->global_default_action == IPE_ACTION_INVALID) + WARN(1, "no default rule set for unknown op, ALLOW it"); + rcu_read_unlock(); + return 0; + } + + rules = &pol->parsed->rules[ctx->op]; + + list_for_each_entry(rule, &rules->rules, next) { + match = true; + + list_for_each_entry(prop, &rule->props, next) { + match = evaluate_property(ctx, prop); + if (!match) + break; + } + + if (match) + break; + } + + if (match) + action = rule->action; + else if (rules->default_action != IPE_ACTION_INVALID) + action = rules->default_action; + else + action = pol->parsed->global_default_action; + + rcu_read_unlock(); + if (action == IPE_ACTION_DENY) + return -EACCES; + + return 0; +} diff --git a/security/ipe/eval.h b/security/ipe/eval.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..6b434515968f --- /dev/null +++ b/security/ipe/eval.h @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +/* + * Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. + */ + +#ifndef _IPE_EVAL_H +#define _IPE_EVAL_H + +#include <linux/file.h> +#include <linux/types.h> + +#include "policy.h" + +extern struct ipe_policy __rcu *ipe_active_policy; + +struct ipe_eval_ctx { + enum ipe_op_type op; + + const struct file *file; +}; + +int ipe_evaluate_event(const struct ipe_eval_ctx *const ctx); + +#endif /* _IPE_EVAL_H */