From patchwork Mon Feb 8 08:52:42 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jingbo Xu X-Patchwork-Id: 12091793 X-Patchwork-Delegate: snitzer@redhat.com Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC67C433DB for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 15:36:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2000C64DA1 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 15:36:13 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2000C64DA1 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=tempfail smtp.mailfrom=dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-144-LwRWuCxNMEiMHEKjMbmGMw-1; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:36:09 -0500 X-MC-Unique: LwRWuCxNMEiMHEKjMbmGMw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 761BC79EC2; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 15:36:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 547A36E403; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 15:36:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.19.33]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E6D81809C8F; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 15:36:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 1188r4lY030097 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 03:53:05 -0500 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id CFF901730C; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 08:53:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast06.extmail.prod.ext.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.55.22]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAAA910EB1 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 08:53:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA393185A78E for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 08:53:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out30-45.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-45.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.45]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-151-EhhxP1SkPsWbdLBLGIQ5KA-1; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 03:52:58 -0500 X-MC-Unique: EhhxP1SkPsWbdLBLGIQ5KA-1 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS; BC=-1|-1; BR=01201311R521e4; CH=green; DM=||false|; DS=||; FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1; HT=e01e01424; MF=jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com; NM=1; PH=DS; RN=8; SR=0; TI=SMTPD_---0UO9kQj0_1612774374 Received: from localhost(mailfrom:jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0UO9kQj0_1612774374) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Mon, 08 Feb 2021 16:52:55 +0800 From: Jeffle Xu To: snitzer@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 16:52:42 +0800 Message-Id: <20210208085243.82367-11-jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com> In-Reply-To: <20210208085243.82367-1-jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com> References: <20210208085243.82367-1-jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mimecast-Impersonation-Protect: Policy=CLT - Impersonation Protection Definition; Similar Internal Domain=false; Similar Monitored External Domain=false; Custom External Domain=false; Mimecast External Domain=false; Newly Observed Domain=false; Internal User Name=false; Custom Display Name List=false; Reply-to Address Mismatch=false; Targeted Threat Dictionary=false; Mimecast Threat Dictionary=false; Custom Threat Dictionary=false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.11.54.5 X-loop: dm-devel@redhat.com X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:31:26 -0500 Cc: caspar@linux.alibaba.com, hch@lst.de, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com, dm-devel@redhat.com, io-uring@vger.kernel.org Subject: [dm-devel] [PATCH v3 10/11] nvme/pci: don't wait for locked polling queue X-BeenThere: dm-devel@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk List-Id: device-mapper development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com There's no sense waiting for the hw queue when it currently has been locked by another polling instance. The polling instance currently occupying the hw queue will help reap the completion events. It shall be safe to surrender the hw queue, as long as we could reapply for polling later. For Synchronous polling, blk_poll() will reapply for polling, since @spin is always True in this case. While For asynchronous polling, i.e. io_uring itself will reapply for polling when the previous polling returns 0. Besides, it shall do no harm to the polling performance of mq devices. Signed-off-by: Jeffle Xu --- drivers/nvme/host/pci.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c index 81e6389b2042..db164fcd04e2 100644 --- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c @@ -1106,7 +1106,9 @@ static int nvme_poll(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx) if (!nvme_cqe_pending(nvmeq)) return 0; - spin_lock(&nvmeq->cq_poll_lock); + if (!spin_trylock(&nvmeq->cq_poll_lock)) + return 0; + found = nvme_process_cq(nvmeq); spin_unlock(&nvmeq->cq_poll_lock);