Message ID | 20221129024850.1842973-2-luomeng12@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted, archived |
Delegated to: | Mike Snitzer |
Headers | show
Return-Path: <dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 930FBC46467 for <dm-devel@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 02:28:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1669688901; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=2ppSf0m1W63JDMTcbwZuhVwskMGX/VStbBc1OWwRDjo=; b=T3zZ81cC6aFUD+JhgDgiN7l0hm3DqtsN6At7QX7Jqr/1Nyz1WNZRiBvw6mSIDqiR13VTXy qo92n2QemL6nLI9azwS3wud44lASMlKirGK9lb0s2j0d+UR7MtWIRuPkJVFqaSkd0b2cYZ eP6s13TvZOLN4KB0fbZHraWX2exVp8M= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-425-bgAK7UMJOp2UyHUZfLxkwg-1; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 21:28:18 -0500 X-MC-Unique: bgAK7UMJOp2UyHUZfLxkwg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78961101AA5D; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 02:28:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm-prod-listman-01.mail-001.prod.us-east-1.aws.redhat.com (mm-prod-listman-01.mail-001.prod.us-east-1.aws.redhat.com [10.30.29.100]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 046414B400F; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 02:28:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm-prod-listman-01.mail-001.prod.us-east-1.aws.redhat.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mm-prod-listman-01.mail-001.prod.us-east-1.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC2419465A0; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 02:28:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.8]) by mm-prod-listman-01.mail-001.prod.us-east-1.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2765A1946A44 for <dm-devel@listman.corp.redhat.com>; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 02:28:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id 0E397C15BB3; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 02:28:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast07.extmail.prod.ext.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.55.23]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06238C15BA4 for <dm-devel@redhat.com>; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 02:28:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-1.mimecast.com [205.139.110.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF4BA3C0257D for <dm-devel@redhat.com>; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 02:28:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (dggsgout12.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.56]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id us-mta-522-Srji3vXZOIGdUh6A9Vou5Q-1; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 21:28:07 -0500 X-MC-Unique: Srji3vXZOIGdUh6A9Vou5Q-1 Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.67.153]) by dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4NLmTW0Tqyz4f3nqG; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 10:27:59 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.127.227]) by APP1 (Coremail) with SMTP id cCh0CgBHPaweboVjlJ0JBQ--.11870S5; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 10:28:01 +0800 (CST) From: Luo Meng <luomeng12@huawei.com> To: agk@redhat.com, snitzer@kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, ejt@redhat.com Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 10:48:47 +0800 Message-Id: <20221129024850.1842973-2-luomeng12@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20221129024850.1842973-1-luomeng12@huawei.com> References: <20221129024850.1842973-1-luomeng12@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: cCh0CgBHPaweboVjlJ0JBQ--.11870S5 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxWry5Ar48Kry7Cr4DKFyrXrb_yoW5Wr43pw 4rA3yayw1DXr4UX3yvyw4kWFyxJa1SvFW2kr1fursrAa4fWw1YvFy2grZ8Way7GrZrAF9x X3Wxt39xXrn0yFUanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUP0b4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26r4j6ryUM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k2 6cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28IrcIa0xkI8VA2jI8067AKxVWUGw A2048vs2IY020Ec7CjxVAFwI0_JFI_Gr1l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxS w2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWDJVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxV W0oVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26rxl6s0DM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW0 oVCq3wAac4AC62xK8xCEY4vEwIxC4wAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc02F40EFc xC0VAKzVAqx4xG6I80ewAv7VC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUGwAv7VC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_ Gr1lOx8S6xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UM4x0Y48IcxkI7VAKI48JMxAIw28IcxkI7VAKI48JMx AIw28IcVAKzI0EY4vE52x082I5MxC20s026xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UMI8I3I0E5I8CrVAF wI0_Jr0_Jr4lx2IqxVCjr7xvwVAFwI0_JrI_JrWlx4CE17CEb7AF67AKxVWUAVWUtwCIc4 0Y0x0EwIxGrwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r1xMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AK xVW8JVWxJwCI42IY6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr 1lIxAIcVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW8JVW8JrUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7IU1NJ55UU UUU== X-CM-SenderInfo: 5oxrzvtqj6x35dzhxuhorxvhhfrp/ X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mimecast-Impersonation-Protect: Policy=CLT - Impersonation Protection Definition; Similar Internal Domain=false; Similar Monitored External Domain=false; Custom External Domain=false; Mimecast External Domain=false; Newly Observed Domain=false; Internal User Name=false; Custom Display Name List=false; Reply-to Address Mismatch=false; Targeted Threat Dictionary=false; Mimecast Threat Dictionary=false; Custom Threat Dictionary=false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.8 Subject: [dm-devel] [dm-devel v2 1/4] dm thin: Fix UAF in run_timer_softirq() X-BeenThere: dm-devel@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: device-mapper development <dm-devel.redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/options/dm-devel>, <mailto:dm-devel-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:dm-devel@redhat.com> List-Help: <mailto:dm-devel-request@redhat.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel>, <mailto:dm-devel-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe> Cc: luomeng12@huawei.com, yukuai3@huawei.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Sender: "dm-devel" <dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.9 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit |
Series |
dm: Fix UAF in run_timer_softirq()
|
expand
|
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-thin.c b/drivers/md/dm-thin.c index e76c96c760a9..dc271c107fb5 100644 --- a/drivers/md/dm-thin.c +++ b/drivers/md/dm-thin.c @@ -2889,6 +2889,8 @@ static void __pool_destroy(struct pool *pool) dm_bio_prison_destroy(pool->prison); dm_kcopyd_client_destroy(pool->copier); + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&pool->waker); + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&pool->no_space_timeout); if (pool->wq) destroy_workqueue(pool->wq);
When dm_resume() and dm_destroy() are concurrent, it will lead to UAF, as follows: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __run_timers+0x173/0x710 Write of size 8 at addr ffff88816d9490f0 by task swapper/0/0 CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.0.0-rc6-00001-gaed496328fcd-dirty #26 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ?-20190727_073836-buildvm-ppc64le-16.ppc.fedoraproject.org-3.fc31 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack_lvl+0x73/0x9f print_report.cold+0x132/0xaa2 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xcd/0x160 __run_timers+0x173/0x710 kasan_report+0xad/0x110 __run_timers+0x173/0x710 __asan_store8+0x9c/0x140 __run_timers+0x173/0x710 call_timer_fn+0x310/0x310 pvclock_clocksource_read+0xfa/0x250 kvm_clock_read+0x2c/0x70 kvm_clock_get_cycles+0xd/0x20 ktime_get+0x5c/0x110 lapic_next_event+0x38/0x50 clockevents_program_event+0xf1/0x1e0 run_timer_softirq+0x49/0x90 __do_softirq+0x16e/0x62c __irq_exit_rcu+0x1fa/0x270 irq_exit_rcu+0x12/0x20 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x8e/0xc0 One of the concurrency UAF can be shown as below: use free do_resume | __find_device_hash_cell | dm_get | atomic_inc(&md->holders) | | dm_destroy | __dm_destroy | if (!dm_suspended_md(md)) | atomic_read(&md->holders) | msleep(1) dm_resume | __dm_resume | dm_table_resume_targets | pool_resume | do_waker #add delay work | dm_put | atomic_dec(&md->holders) | | dm_table_destroy | pool_dtr | __pool_dec | __pool_destroy | destroy_workqueue | kfree(pool) # free pool time out __do_softirq run_timer_softirq # pool has already been freed This can be easily reproduced using: 1. create thin-pool 2. dmsetup suspend pool 3. dmsetup resume pool 4. dmsetup remove_all # Concurrent with 3 The root cause of UAF bugs is that dm_resume() adds timer after dm_destroy() skips cancel timer beause of suspend status. After timeout, it will call run_timer_softirq(), however pool has already been freed. The concurrency UAF bug will happen. Therefore, canceling timer again in __pool_destroy(). Fixes: 991d9fa02da0d (dm: add thin provisioning target) Signed-off-by: Luo Meng <luomeng12@huawei.com> --- drivers/md/dm-thin.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)