Message ID | 20230420100501.32981-14-jth@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded, archived |
Delegated to: | Mike Snitzer |
Headers | show |
Series | bio: check return values of bio_add_page | expand |
+ Minchan On (23/04/20 12:04), Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > > From: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> > > The zram writeback code uses bio_add_page() to add a page to a newly > created bio. bio_add_page() can fail, but the return value is never > checked. > > Use __bio_add_page() as adding a single page to a newly created bio is > guaranteed to succeed. > > This brings us a step closer to marking bio_add_page() as __must_check. > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> > Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org> -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c index aa490da3cef2..9179bd0f248c 100644 --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c @@ -760,7 +760,7 @@ static ssize_t writeback_store(struct device *dev, REQ_OP_WRITE | REQ_SYNC); bio.bi_iter.bi_sector = blk_idx * (PAGE_SIZE >> 9); - bio_add_page(&bio, bvec.bv_page, bvec.bv_len, + __bio_add_page(&bio, bvec.bv_page, bvec.bv_len, bvec.bv_offset); /* * XXX: A single page IO would be inefficient for write