From patchwork Sat Jun 3 14:52:40 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Demi Marie Obenour X-Patchwork-Id: 13266176 X-Patchwork-Delegate: snitzer@redhat.com Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58B26C7EE24 for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2023 14:53:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1685804003; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=0GydxEyIfj5trnMKR5cZKwokhDGM+brf6myNhah6VQs=; b=J0r0UDAEufSSjwdWPULRl+iXxTLLz3yGn76sAGzE/SFbPA2kkMasKWa/noHqqWWS2MnCOD MS4BD8MmKv7EaCVeY2eQr1t+/K16iyIx9j0sLg7+mSP0y98Bd51UvlVKlcfYgm3g4ZkYXG ktt2VINNrKHVP0+Izo2rc+1WLMPEcw0= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-292-Wb3EH3SSPhu4o4pO_R2Fug-1; Sat, 03 Jun 2023 10:53:20 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Wb3EH3SSPhu4o4pO_R2Fug-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3739685A5B5; Sat, 3 Jun 2023 14:53:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm-prod-listman-01.mail-001.prod.us-east-1.aws.redhat.com (mm-prod-listman-01.mail-001.prod.us-east-1.aws.redhat.com [10.30.29.100]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D81BC492B00; Sat, 3 Jun 2023 14:53:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm-prod-listman-01.mail-001.prod.us-east-1.aws.redhat.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mm-prod-listman-01.mail-001.prod.us-east-1.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8848219465A3; Sat, 3 Jun 2023 14:53:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.8]) by mm-prod-listman-01.mail-001.prod.us-east-1.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24AB61946595 for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2023 14:53:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id 00A27C154DA; Sat, 3 Jun 2023 14:53:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast09.extmail.prod.ext.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.55.25]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC9F0C154D7 for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2023 14:53:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-2.mimecast.com [207.211.31.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2FE529AA3B9 for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2023 14:53:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-245-7xDQEJaTMtiLxlNrpGnMzA-1; Sat, 03 Jun 2023 10:53:14 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 7xDQEJaTMtiLxlNrpGnMzA-1 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05CCE5C00D5; Sat, 3 Jun 2023 10:53:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 03 Jun 2023 10:53:14 -0400 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrfeelhedgkedvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvvefufffkofgjfhgggfestdekredtredttdenucfhrhhomhepffgvmhhi ucforghrihgvucfqsggvnhhouhhruceouggvmhhisehinhhvihhsihgslhgvthhhihhngh hslhgrsgdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepjeffjefggfeugeduvedvjeekgfeh gffhhfffjeetkeelueefffetfffhtdduheetnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgepudenuc frrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepuggvmhhisehinhhvihhsihgslhgvthhhihhnghhs lhgrsgdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: iac594737:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sat, 3 Jun 2023 10:53:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Demi Marie Obenour To: Alasdair Kergon , Mike Snitzer , dm-devel@redhat.com Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2023 10:52:40 -0400 Message-Id: <20230603145244.1538-3-demi@invisiblethingslab.com> In-Reply-To: <20230603145244.1538-1-demi@invisiblethingslab.com> References: <20230601212456.1533-1-demi@invisiblethingslab.com> <20230603145244.1538-1-demi@invisiblethingslab.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mimecast-Impersonation-Protect: Policy=CLT - Impersonation Protection Definition; Similar Internal Domain=false; Similar Monitored External Domain=false; Custom External Domain=false; Mimecast External Domain=false; Newly Observed Domain=false; Internal User Name=false; Custom Display Name List=false; Reply-to Address Mismatch=false; Targeted Threat Dictionary=false; Mimecast Threat Dictionary=false; Custom Threat Dictionary=false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.8 Subject: [dm-devel] [PATCH v2 2/6] device-mapper: Avoid pointer arithmetic overflow X-BeenThere: dm-devel@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: device-mapper development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Demi Marie Obenour , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Sender: "dm-devel" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.9 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: invisiblethingslab.com Especially on 32-bit systems, it is possible for the pointer arithmetic to overflow and cause a userspace pointer to be dereferenced in the kernel. Signed-off-by: Demi Marie Obenour Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Mikulas Patocka --- drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c b/drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c index 34fa74c6a70db8aa67aaba3f6a2fc4f38ef736bc..64e8f16d344c47057de5e2d29e3d63202197dca0 100644 --- a/drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c +++ b/drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c @@ -1396,6 +1396,25 @@ static int next_target(struct dm_target_spec *last, uint32_t next, void *end, { static_assert(_Alignof(struct dm_target_spec) <= 8, "struct dm_target_spec has excessive alignment requirements"); + static_assert(offsetof(struct dm_ioctl, data) >= sizeof(struct dm_target_spec), + "struct dm_target_spec too big"); + + /* + * Number of bytes remaining, starting with last. This is always + * sizeof(struct dm_target_spec) or more, as otherwise *last was + * out of bounds already. + */ + size_t remaining = (char *)end - (char *)last; + + /* + * There must be room for both the next target spec and the + * NUL-terminator of the target itself. + */ + if (remaining - sizeof(struct dm_target_spec) <= next) { + DMERR("Target spec extends beyond end of parameters"); + return -EINVAL; + } + if (next % 8) { DMERR("Next target spec (offset %u) is not 8-byte aligned", next); return -EINVAL;