From patchwork Thu Feb 1 09:25:47 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Yu Kuai X-Patchwork-Id: 13540834 Received: from dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (unknown [45.249.212.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63FE915B10E for ; Thu, 1 Feb 2024 09:30:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706779832; cv=none; b=vGbW48nPq4hwfVW6VoKQoA4Eu4PYJruE7dWwjO8xXmDD11QkcPCNDx1oTCeoxMDZZu7CNj4fhQBxIoONVK4+NGBCEP5ULq4sF9ft3adKhH0w9HKFgYy4kRQgAXqZmAyJqhsinwyQSZNIWVgMwT33T4gvxrM//u9Qpj+KvtsqiWQ= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706779832; c=relaxed/simple; bh=h4mAM5munNDh64f9BT7eKjkJVG7xHUqubnznwxYlHRM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=YN3mow2QnGKulmWShuvi2DwD8K52V5gKvZg5UlkTnrLK4I0PZLh+Ucy5GVpMoKVzfCO/Ph3IxyopvrDt/nb1Z9BAlWHta9koobG6rvSLyCtmMEwT1aOuOpnkY1ARBgWD+LOf4UZ+rSIyZH1uPXJghG4ejnpfGKFMkWufYY5iRzY= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.216]) by dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4TQYXt0qKKz4f3l6n for ; Thu, 1 Feb 2024 17:30:22 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [10.116.40.112]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 526BE1A038B for ; Thu, 1 Feb 2024 17:30:26 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.104.67]) by APP1 (Coremail) with SMTP id cCh0CgCXaBGtZLtl8V6KCg--.33515S6; Thu, 01 Feb 2024 17:30:26 +0800 (CST) From: Yu Kuai To: mpatocka@redhat.com, heinzm@redhat.com, xni@redhat.com, blazej.kucman@linux.intel.com, agk@redhat.com, snitzer@kernel.org, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yukuai3@huawei.com, jbrassow@f14.redhat.com, neilb@suse.de, shli@fb.com, akpm@osdl.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, yukuai1@huaweicloud.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com Subject: [PATCH v5 02/14] md: don't ignore read-only array in md_check_recovery() Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 17:25:47 +0800 Message-Id: <20240201092559.910982-3-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240201092559.910982-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> References: <20240201092559.910982-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: dm-devel@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: cCh0CgCXaBGtZLtl8V6KCg--.33515S6 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxCF1xZw47XF4fCr17tFyUGFg_yoWrXw45pa yfKas8Cr4UtFy3urZrK3WDXayYvr10qrZ0yFy3u34fAw1rtr4Sk34ruFyUJFWDtFyFqw4Y vw4rJF43ZFy8Kw7anT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUPj14x267AKxVWrJVCq3wAFc2x0x2IEx4CE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0 rVWrJVCq3wAFIxvE14AKwVWUJVWUGwA2048vs2IY020E87I2jVAFwI0_Jryl82xGYIkIc2 x26xkF7I0E14v26ryj6s0DM28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rwA2F7IY1VAKz4vEj48ve4kI8wA2z4x0 Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_tr0E3s1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr1j6F4UJw A2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26rxl6s0DM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW0oVCq3wAS 0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc02F40EFcxC0VAKzVAqx4xG6I80ewAv7VC0I7IYx2 IY67AKxVWUJVWUGwAv7VC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lOx8S6xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UM4x0 Y48IcxkI7VAKI48JM4x0x7Aq67IIx4CEVc8vx2IErcIFxwACI402YVCY1x02628vn2kIc2 xKxwCF04k20xvY0x0EwIxGrwCFx2IqxVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwC20s026c02F40E14v2 6r1j6r18MI8I3I0E7480Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF67kF1VAFwI0_GFv_WrylIxkGc2 Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_ Cr0_Gr1UMIIF0xvE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8Jw CI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26r4j6r4UJbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjfUOJPEUUUU U X-CM-SenderInfo: 51xn3trlr6x35dzhxuhorxvhhfrp/ From: Yu Kuai Usually if the array is not read-write, md_check_recovery() won't register new sync_thread in the first place. And if the array is read-write and sync_thread is registered, md_set_readonly() will unregister sync_thread before setting the array read-only. md/raid follow this behavior hence there is no problem. After commit f52f5c71f3d4 ("md: fix stopping sync thread"), following hang can be triggered by test shell/integrity-caching.sh: 1) array is read-only. dm-raid update super block: rs_update_sbs ro = mddev->ro mddev->ro = 0 -> set array read-write md_update_sb 2) register new sync thread concurrently. 3) dm-raid set array back to read-only: rs_update_sbs mddev->ro = ro 4) stop the array: raid_dtr md_stop stop_sync_thread set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_INTR, &mddev->recovery); md_wakeup_thread_directly(mddev->sync_thread); wait_event(..., !test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, &mddev->recovery)) 5) sync thread done: md_do_sync set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_DONE, &mddev->recovery); md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread); 6) daemon thread can't unregister sync thread: md_check_recovery if (!md_is_rdwr(mddev) && !test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, &mddev->recovery)) return; -> -> MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING can't be cleared, hence step 4 hang; The root cause is that dm-raid manipulate 'mddev->ro' by itself, however, dm-raid really should stop sync thread before setting the array read-only. Unfortunately, I need to read more code before I can refacter the handler of 'mddev->ro' in dm-raid, hence let's fix the problem the easy way for now to prevent dm-raid regression. Reported-by: Mikulas Patocka Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/9801e40-8ac7-e225-6a71-309dcf9dc9aa@redhat.com/ Fixes: ecbfb9f118bc ("dm raid: add raid level takeover support") Fixes: f52f5c71f3d4 ("md: fix stopping sync thread") Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai --- drivers/md/md.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c index 07b80278eaa5..6906d023f1d6 100644 --- a/drivers/md/md.c +++ b/drivers/md/md.c @@ -9445,6 +9445,20 @@ static void md_start_sync(struct work_struct *ws) sysfs_notify_dirent_safe(mddev->sysfs_action); } +static void unregister_sync_thread(struct mddev *mddev) +{ + if (!test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_DONE, &mddev->recovery)) { + /* resync/recovery still happening */ + clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, &mddev->recovery); + return; + } + + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!mddev->sync_thread)) + return; + + md_reap_sync_thread(mddev); +} + /* * This routine is regularly called by all per-raid-array threads to * deal with generic issues like resync and super-block update. @@ -9482,7 +9496,8 @@ void md_check_recovery(struct mddev *mddev) } if (!md_is_rdwr(mddev) && - !test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, &mddev->recovery)) + !test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, &mddev->recovery) && + !test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_DONE, &mddev->recovery)) return; if ( ! ( (mddev->sb_flags & ~ (1<recovery)) { - /* sync_work already queued. */ - clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, &mddev->recovery); + unregister_sync_thread(mddev); goto unlock; } @@ -9568,16 +9582,7 @@ void md_check_recovery(struct mddev *mddev) * still set. */ if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, &mddev->recovery)) { - if (!test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_DONE, &mddev->recovery)) { - /* resync/recovery still happening */ - clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, &mddev->recovery); - goto unlock; - } - - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!mddev->sync_thread)) - goto unlock; - - md_reap_sync_thread(mddev); + unregister_sync_thread(mddev); goto unlock; }