Message ID | 4A8B7336.7010800@cn.fujitsu.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:36:22AM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote: > Vivek Goyal wrote: > ... > > > + > > +static void elv_preempt_queue(struct request_queue *q, struct io_queue *ioq) > > +{ > > + elv_log_ioq(q->elevator->efqd, ioq, "preempt"); > > + elv_slice_expired(q); > > + > > + /* > > + * Put the new queue at the front of the of the current list, > > + * so we know that it will be selected next. > > + */ > > + > > + requeue_ioq(ioq); > > + ioq->slice_start = ioq->slice_end = 0; > > I think this assignment is redundant because these two members will be reset > when this ioq is scheduled. > > Signed-off-by: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com> thanks Gui. Queued for next posting. Vivek > --- > block/elevator-fq.c | 1 - > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/block/elevator-fq.c b/block/elevator-fq.c > index d04e925..b3c387d 100644 > --- a/block/elevator-fq.c > +++ b/block/elevator-fq.c > @@ -2650,7 +2650,6 @@ static void elv_preempt_queue(struct request_queue *q, struct io_queue *ioq) > */ > > requeue_ioq(ioq); > - ioq->slice_start = ioq->slice_end = 0; > elv_mark_ioq_slice_new(ioq); > } > } > -- > 1.5.4.rc3 > > -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
diff --git a/block/elevator-fq.c b/block/elevator-fq.c index d04e925..b3c387d 100644 --- a/block/elevator-fq.c +++ b/block/elevator-fq.c @@ -2650,7 +2650,6 @@ static void elv_preempt_queue(struct request_queue *q, struct io_queue *ioq) */ requeue_ioq(ioq); - ioq->slice_start = ioq->slice_end = 0; elv_mark_ioq_slice_new(ioq); } }