Message ID | 4A8DFE3A.6030503@cn.fujitsu.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 09:54:02AM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote: > Vivek Goyal wrote: > ... > > + > > +static void put_prev_io_entity(struct io_entity *entity) > > +{ > > + struct io_service_tree *st = entity->st; > > + struct io_sched_data *sd = io_entity_sched_data(entity); > > + > > + st->active_entity = NULL; > > + sd->active_entity = NULL; > > + > > + if (unlikely(entity->ioprio_changed)) { > > + dequeue_io_entity(entity); > > + io_entity_update_prio(entity); > > Hi Vivek, > > we don't need to update prio here for the following enqueue_io_entity() > is already taking care of it. > Thanks Gui. Jerome already raised this point in one of the replies. Will take care of it in next posting. Vivek > Signed-off-by: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com> > --- > block/elevator-fq.c | 1 - > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/block/elevator-fq.c b/block/elevator-fq.c > index 201543e..b720139 100644 > --- a/block/elevator-fq.c > +++ b/block/elevator-fq.c > @@ -607,7 +607,6 @@ static void put_prev_io_entity(struct io_entity *entity) > > if (unlikely(entity->ioprio_changed)) { > dequeue_io_entity(entity); > - io_entity_update_prio(entity); > enqueue_io_entity(entity); > } else > __enqueue_io_entity(st, entity); > -- > 1.5.4.rc3 > -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
diff --git a/block/elevator-fq.c b/block/elevator-fq.c index 201543e..b720139 100644 --- a/block/elevator-fq.c +++ b/block/elevator-fq.c @@ -607,7 +607,6 @@ static void put_prev_io_entity(struct io_entity *entity) if (unlikely(entity->ioprio_changed)) { dequeue_io_entity(entity); - io_entity_update_prio(entity); enqueue_io_entity(entity); } else __enqueue_io_entity(st, entity);