Message ID | 1618226325-31927-1-git-send-email-yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Revert "mailbox: mediatek: remove implementation related to atomic_exec" | expand |
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 6:18 AM Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com> wrote: > > This series base linux 5.12-rc2 > these patches will cause home ui flick when cursor moved, > there is no fix solution yet, revert these patches first. > > change since v1: > add mtk-gce.txt and dts modification > > Yongqiang Niu (5): > Revert "drm/mediatek: Make sure previous message done or be aborted > before send" > Revert "mailbox: mediatek: remove implementation related to > atomic_exec" > Revert "dt-bindings: mailbox: mtk-gce: fix incorrect mbox-cells value" > Revert "arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8183: fix gce incorrect mbox-cells > value" > arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8183: add gce information for mmsys > > .../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mtk-gce.txt | 2 +- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183.dtsi | 5 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c | 1 - > drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++--- > 4 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > Please break the patchsets (this and the other 3) into mailbox only and platform specific ones. Also, it would help if there are some acked/reviewed by some mtk folks especially when reverting patches. thanks
On 12/04/2021 17:29, Jassi Brar wrote: > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 6:18 AM Yongqiang Niu > <yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com> wrote: >> >> This series base linux 5.12-rc2 >> these patches will cause home ui flick when cursor moved, >> there is no fix solution yet, revert these patches first. >> >> change since v1: >> add mtk-gce.txt and dts modification >> >> Yongqiang Niu (5): >> Revert "drm/mediatek: Make sure previous message done or be aborted >> before send" >> Revert "mailbox: mediatek: remove implementation related to >> atomic_exec" >> Revert "dt-bindings: mailbox: mtk-gce: fix incorrect mbox-cells value" >> Revert "arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8183: fix gce incorrect mbox-cells >> value" >> arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8183: add gce information for mmsys >> >> .../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mtk-gce.txt | 2 +- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183.dtsi | 5 +- >> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c | 1 - >> drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++--- >> 4 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) >> > Please break the patchsets (this and the other 3) into mailbox only > and platform specific ones. > Also, it would help if there are some acked/reviewed by some mtk folks > especially when reverting patches. > I'd prefer to have DT and mailbox patches together as otherwise the burden on me to find out which patches in the driver are needed, and to check if these got accepted, gets higher. Regards, Matthias
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 3:51 AM Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 12/04/2021 17:29, Jassi Brar wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 6:18 AM Yongqiang Niu > > <yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com> wrote: > >> > >> This series base linux 5.12-rc2 > >> these patches will cause home ui flick when cursor moved, > >> there is no fix solution yet, revert these patches first. > >> > >> change since v1: > >> add mtk-gce.txt and dts modification > >> > >> Yongqiang Niu (5): > >> Revert "drm/mediatek: Make sure previous message done or be aborted > >> before send" > >> Revert "mailbox: mediatek: remove implementation related to > >> atomic_exec" > >> Revert "dt-bindings: mailbox: mtk-gce: fix incorrect mbox-cells value" > >> Revert "arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8183: fix gce incorrect mbox-cells > >> value" > >> arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8183: add gce information for mmsys > >> > >> .../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mtk-gce.txt | 2 +- > >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183.dtsi | 5 +- > >> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c | 1 - > >> drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++--- > >> 4 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > >> > > Please break the patchsets (this and the other 3) into mailbox only > > and platform specific ones. > > Also, it would help if there are some acked/reviewed by some mtk folks > > especially when reverting patches. > > > > I'd prefer to have DT and mailbox patches together as otherwise the burden on me > to find out which patches in the driver are needed, and to check if these got > accepted, gets higher. > I meant the patches that need to go via mailbox tree (controller) and the rest. thanks.