| Message ID | 1352123744-13269-5-git-send-email-thellstrom@vmware.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c index bf6e4b5..46008ea 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ int ttm_bo_reserve_locked(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, struct ttm_bo_global *glob = bo->glob; int ret; - while (unlikely(atomic_cmpxchg(&bo->reserved, 0, 1) != 0)) { + while (unlikely(atomic_read(&bo->reserved) != 0)) { /** * Deadlock avoidance for multi-bo reserving. */ @@ -249,6 +249,7 @@ int ttm_bo_reserve_locked(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, return ret; } + atomic_set(&bo->reserved, 1); if (use_sequence) { /** * Wake up waiters that may need to recheck for deadlock,
Reservation locking currently always takes place under the LRU spinlock. Hence, strictly there is no need for an atomic_cmpxchg call; we can use atomic_read followed by atomic_write since nobody else will ever reserve without the lru spinlock held. At least on Intel this should remove a locked bus cycle on successful reserve. Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)