| Message ID | 1410786785-9838-3-git-send-email-gautam.vivek@samsung.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
Hi, On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@samsung.com> wrote: > Now that we have moved to generic phy based bindings, > we don't need to have any code related to older dptx-phy. > Nobody is using this dptx-phy anymore, so removing the > same. > > Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@samsung.com> > Cc: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com> > --- Is someone taking care of this patch ? We already have got the corresponsding dp-phy patch merged, so we should also get this patch in. > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c | 58 +++++++------------------------ > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h | 2 -- > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c > index 4f3c7eb..5ffc1b2 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c > @@ -1050,28 +1050,14 @@ static int exynos_dp_create_connector(struct exynos_drm_display *display, > > static void exynos_dp_phy_init(struct exynos_dp_device *dp) > { > - if (dp->phy) { > + if (dp->phy) > phy_power_on(dp->phy); > - } else if (dp->phy_addr) { > - u32 reg; > - > - reg = __raw_readl(dp->phy_addr); > - reg |= dp->enable_mask; > - __raw_writel(reg, dp->phy_addr); > - } > } > > static void exynos_dp_phy_exit(struct exynos_dp_device *dp) > { > - if (dp->phy) { > + if (dp->phy) > phy_power_off(dp->phy); > - } else if (dp->phy_addr) { > - u32 reg; > - > - reg = __raw_readl(dp->phy_addr); > - reg &= ~(dp->enable_mask); > - __raw_writel(reg, dp->phy_addr); > - } > } > > static void exynos_dp_poweron(struct exynos_drm_display *display) > @@ -1210,39 +1196,21 @@ static struct video_info *exynos_dp_dt_parse_pdata(struct device *dev) > > static int exynos_dp_dt_parse_phydata(struct exynos_dp_device *dp) > { > - struct device_node *dp_phy_node = of_node_get(dp->dev->of_node); > - u32 phy_base; > int ret = 0; > > - dp_phy_node = of_find_node_by_name(dp_phy_node, "dptx-phy"); > - if (!dp_phy_node) { > - dp->phy = devm_phy_get(dp->dev, "dp"); > - return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(dp->phy); > - } > - > - if (of_property_read_u32(dp_phy_node, "reg", &phy_base)) { > - dev_err(dp->dev, "failed to get reg for dptx-phy\n"); > - ret = -EINVAL; > - goto err; > - } > - > - if (of_property_read_u32(dp_phy_node, "samsung,enable-mask", > - &dp->enable_mask)) { > - dev_err(dp->dev, "failed to get enable-mask for dptx-phy\n"); > - ret = -EINVAL; > - goto err; > - } > - > - dp->phy_addr = ioremap(phy_base, SZ_4); > - if (!dp->phy_addr) { > - dev_err(dp->dev, "failed to ioremap dp-phy\n"); > - ret = -ENOMEM; > - goto err; > + dp->phy = devm_phy_get(dp->dev, "dp"); > + if (IS_ERR(dp->phy)) { > + ret = PTR_ERR(dp->phy); > + if (ret == -ENOSYS || ret == -ENODEV) { > + dp->phy = NULL; > + } else if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) { > + return ret; > + } else { > + dev_err(dp->dev, "no DP phy configured\n"); > + return ret; > + } > } > > -err: > - of_node_put(dp_phy_node); > - > return ret; > } > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h > index a1aee69..6426201 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h > @@ -153,8 +153,6 @@ struct exynos_dp_device { > struct clk *clock; > unsigned int irq; > void __iomem *reg_base; > - void __iomem *phy_addr; > - unsigned int enable_mask; > > struct video_info *video_info; > struct link_train link_train; > -- > 1.7.10.4 >
Hi, CC'ing Kukjin, my bad, missed him while sending the patch. :-( On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@samsung.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@samsung.com> wrote: >> Now that we have moved to generic phy based bindings, >> we don't need to have any code related to older dptx-phy. >> Nobody is using this dptx-phy anymore, so removing the >> same. >> >> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@samsung.com> >> Cc: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com> >> --- > > Is someone taking care of this patch ? We already have got the corresponsding > dp-phy patch merged, so we should also get this patch in. > >> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c | 58 +++++++------------------------ >> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h | 2 -- >> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c >> index 4f3c7eb..5ffc1b2 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c >> @@ -1050,28 +1050,14 @@ static int exynos_dp_create_connector(struct exynos_drm_display *display, >> >> static void exynos_dp_phy_init(struct exynos_dp_device *dp) >> { >> - if (dp->phy) { >> + if (dp->phy) >> phy_power_on(dp->phy); >> - } else if (dp->phy_addr) { >> - u32 reg; >> - >> - reg = __raw_readl(dp->phy_addr); >> - reg |= dp->enable_mask; >> - __raw_writel(reg, dp->phy_addr); >> - } >> } >> >> static void exynos_dp_phy_exit(struct exynos_dp_device *dp) >> { >> - if (dp->phy) { >> + if (dp->phy) >> phy_power_off(dp->phy); >> - } else if (dp->phy_addr) { >> - u32 reg; >> - >> - reg = __raw_readl(dp->phy_addr); >> - reg &= ~(dp->enable_mask); >> - __raw_writel(reg, dp->phy_addr); >> - } >> } >> >> static void exynos_dp_poweron(struct exynos_drm_display *display) >> @@ -1210,39 +1196,21 @@ static struct video_info *exynos_dp_dt_parse_pdata(struct device *dev) >> >> static int exynos_dp_dt_parse_phydata(struct exynos_dp_device *dp) >> { >> - struct device_node *dp_phy_node = of_node_get(dp->dev->of_node); >> - u32 phy_base; >> int ret = 0; >> >> - dp_phy_node = of_find_node_by_name(dp_phy_node, "dptx-phy"); >> - if (!dp_phy_node) { >> - dp->phy = devm_phy_get(dp->dev, "dp"); >> - return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(dp->phy); >> - } >> - >> - if (of_property_read_u32(dp_phy_node, "reg", &phy_base)) { >> - dev_err(dp->dev, "failed to get reg for dptx-phy\n"); >> - ret = -EINVAL; >> - goto err; >> - } >> - >> - if (of_property_read_u32(dp_phy_node, "samsung,enable-mask", >> - &dp->enable_mask)) { >> - dev_err(dp->dev, "failed to get enable-mask for dptx-phy\n"); >> - ret = -EINVAL; >> - goto err; >> - } >> - >> - dp->phy_addr = ioremap(phy_base, SZ_4); >> - if (!dp->phy_addr) { >> - dev_err(dp->dev, "failed to ioremap dp-phy\n"); >> - ret = -ENOMEM; >> - goto err; >> + dp->phy = devm_phy_get(dp->dev, "dp"); >> + if (IS_ERR(dp->phy)) { >> + ret = PTR_ERR(dp->phy); >> + if (ret == -ENOSYS || ret == -ENODEV) { >> + dp->phy = NULL; >> + } else if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) { >> + return ret; >> + } else { >> + dev_err(dp->dev, "no DP phy configured\n"); >> + return ret; >> + } >> } >> >> -err: >> - of_node_put(dp_phy_node); >> - >> return ret; >> } >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h >> index a1aee69..6426201 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h >> @@ -153,8 +153,6 @@ struct exynos_dp_device { >> struct clk *clock; >> unsigned int irq; >> void __iomem *reg_base; >> - void __iomem *phy_addr; >> - unsigned int enable_mask; >> >> struct video_info *video_info; >> struct link_train link_train; >> -- >> 1.7.10.4 >> > > > > -- > Best Regards > Vivek Gautam > Samsung R&D Institute, Bangalore > India
On 2014? 10? 08? 11:57, Vivek Gautam wrote: > Hi, > > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@samsung.com> wrote: >> Now that we have moved to generic phy based bindings, >> we don't need to have any code related to older dptx-phy. >> Nobody is using this dptx-phy anymore, so removing the >> same. >> >> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@samsung.com> >> Cc: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com> >> --- > > Is someone taking care of this patch ? We already have got the corresponsding > dp-phy patch merged, so we should also get this patch in. > Can anyone give me tested-by after test? I cannot test this module because I have no any board equipped with dp panel. Jingoo or other? Thanks, Inki Dae >> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c | 58 +++++++------------------------ >> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h | 2 -- >> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c >> index 4f3c7eb..5ffc1b2 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c >> @@ -1050,28 +1050,14 @@ static int exynos_dp_create_connector(struct exynos_drm_display *display, >> >> static void exynos_dp_phy_init(struct exynos_dp_device *dp) >> { >> - if (dp->phy) { >> + if (dp->phy) >> phy_power_on(dp->phy); >> - } else if (dp->phy_addr) { >> - u32 reg; >> - >> - reg = __raw_readl(dp->phy_addr); >> - reg |= dp->enable_mask; >> - __raw_writel(reg, dp->phy_addr); >> - } >> } >> >> static void exynos_dp_phy_exit(struct exynos_dp_device *dp) >> { >> - if (dp->phy) { >> + if (dp->phy) >> phy_power_off(dp->phy); >> - } else if (dp->phy_addr) { >> - u32 reg; >> - >> - reg = __raw_readl(dp->phy_addr); >> - reg &= ~(dp->enable_mask); >> - __raw_writel(reg, dp->phy_addr); >> - } >> } >> >> static void exynos_dp_poweron(struct exynos_drm_display *display) >> @@ -1210,39 +1196,21 @@ static struct video_info *exynos_dp_dt_parse_pdata(struct device *dev) >> >> static int exynos_dp_dt_parse_phydata(struct exynos_dp_device *dp) >> { >> - struct device_node *dp_phy_node = of_node_get(dp->dev->of_node); >> - u32 phy_base; >> int ret = 0; >> >> - dp_phy_node = of_find_node_by_name(dp_phy_node, "dptx-phy"); >> - if (!dp_phy_node) { >> - dp->phy = devm_phy_get(dp->dev, "dp"); >> - return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(dp->phy); >> - } >> - >> - if (of_property_read_u32(dp_phy_node, "reg", &phy_base)) { >> - dev_err(dp->dev, "failed to get reg for dptx-phy\n"); >> - ret = -EINVAL; >> - goto err; >> - } >> - >> - if (of_property_read_u32(dp_phy_node, "samsung,enable-mask", >> - &dp->enable_mask)) { >> - dev_err(dp->dev, "failed to get enable-mask for dptx-phy\n"); >> - ret = -EINVAL; >> - goto err; >> - } >> - >> - dp->phy_addr = ioremap(phy_base, SZ_4); >> - if (!dp->phy_addr) { >> - dev_err(dp->dev, "failed to ioremap dp-phy\n"); >> - ret = -ENOMEM; >> - goto err; >> + dp->phy = devm_phy_get(dp->dev, "dp"); >> + if (IS_ERR(dp->phy)) { >> + ret = PTR_ERR(dp->phy); >> + if (ret == -ENOSYS || ret == -ENODEV) { >> + dp->phy = NULL; >> + } else if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) { >> + return ret; >> + } else { >> + dev_err(dp->dev, "no DP phy configured\n"); >> + return ret; >> + } >> } >> >> -err: >> - of_node_put(dp_phy_node); >> - >> return ret; >> } >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h >> index a1aee69..6426201 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h >> @@ -153,8 +153,6 @@ struct exynos_dp_device { >> struct clk *clock; >> unsigned int irq; >> void __iomem *reg_base; >> - void __iomem *phy_addr; >> - unsigned int enable_mask; >> >> struct video_info *video_info; >> struct link_train link_train; >> -- >> 1.7.10.4 >> > > >
Sorry for late. I missed this patch a little bit for long time. On 2014? 09? 15? 22:13, Vivek Gautam wrote: > Now that we have moved to generic phy based bindings, > we don't need to have any code related to older dptx-phy. > Nobody is using this dptx-phy anymore, so removing the > same. > > Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@samsung.com> > Cc: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c | 58 +++++++------------------------ > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h | 2 -- > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c > index 4f3c7eb..5ffc1b2 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c > @@ -1050,28 +1050,14 @@ static int exynos_dp_create_connector(struct exynos_drm_display *display, > > static void exynos_dp_phy_init(struct exynos_dp_device *dp) > { > - if (dp->phy) { > + if (dp->phy) > phy_power_on(dp->phy); > - } else if (dp->phy_addr) { > - u32 reg; > - > - reg = __raw_readl(dp->phy_addr); > - reg |= dp->enable_mask; > - __raw_writel(reg, dp->phy_addr); > - } > } > > static void exynos_dp_phy_exit(struct exynos_dp_device *dp) > { > - if (dp->phy) { > + if (dp->phy) > phy_power_off(dp->phy); > - } else if (dp->phy_addr) { > - u32 reg; > - > - reg = __raw_readl(dp->phy_addr); > - reg &= ~(dp->enable_mask); > - __raw_writel(reg, dp->phy_addr); > - } > } > > static void exynos_dp_poweron(struct exynos_drm_display *display) > @@ -1210,39 +1196,21 @@ static struct video_info *exynos_dp_dt_parse_pdata(struct device *dev) > > static int exynos_dp_dt_parse_phydata(struct exynos_dp_device *dp) > { > - struct device_node *dp_phy_node = of_node_get(dp->dev->of_node); > - u32 phy_base; > int ret = 0; > > - dp_phy_node = of_find_node_by_name(dp_phy_node, "dptx-phy"); > - if (!dp_phy_node) { > - dp->phy = devm_phy_get(dp->dev, "dp"); > - return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(dp->phy); > - } > - > - if (of_property_read_u32(dp_phy_node, "reg", &phy_base)) { > - dev_err(dp->dev, "failed to get reg for dptx-phy\n"); > - ret = -EINVAL; > - goto err; > - } > - > - if (of_property_read_u32(dp_phy_node, "samsung,enable-mask", > - &dp->enable_mask)) { > - dev_err(dp->dev, "failed to get enable-mask for dptx-phy\n"); > - ret = -EINVAL; > - goto err; > - } > - > - dp->phy_addr = ioremap(phy_base, SZ_4); > - if (!dp->phy_addr) { > - dev_err(dp->dev, "failed to ioremap dp-phy\n"); > - ret = -ENOMEM; > - goto err; > + dp->phy = devm_phy_get(dp->dev, "dp"); > + if (IS_ERR(dp->phy)) { > + ret = PTR_ERR(dp->phy); > + if (ret == -ENOSYS || ret == -ENODEV) { > + dp->phy = NULL; > + } else if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) { > + return ret; > + } else { WARNING: else is not generally useful after a break or return #146: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c:1208: + return ret; + } else { How about just returning ret like below? if (IS_ERR(dp->phy)) { dev_err(dp->dev, "no DP phy configured\n"); return PTR_ERR(ret); } And then you can handle the error at probe function properly. Thanks, Inki Dae > + dev_err(dp->dev, "no DP phy configured\n"); > + return ret; > + } > } > > -err: > - of_node_put(dp_phy_node); > - > return ret; > } > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h > index a1aee69..6426201 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h > @@ -153,8 +153,6 @@ struct exynos_dp_device { > struct clk *clock; > unsigned int irq; > void __iomem *reg_base; > - void __iomem *phy_addr; > - unsigned int enable_mask; > > struct video_info *video_info; > struct link_train link_train; >
Hi Inki, On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com> wrote: > > Sorry for late. I missed this patch a little bit for long time. Thanks for reviewing. > > > On 2014? 09? 15? 22:13, Vivek Gautam wrote: >> Now that we have moved to generic phy based bindings, >> we don't need to have any code related to older dptx-phy. >> Nobody is using this dptx-phy anymore, so removing the >> same. >> >> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@samsung.com> >> Cc: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c | 58 +++++++------------------------ >> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h | 2 -- >> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c >> index 4f3c7eb..5ffc1b2 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c >> @@ -1050,28 +1050,14 @@ static int exynos_dp_create_connector(struct exynos_drm_display *display, >> >> static void exynos_dp_phy_init(struct exynos_dp_device *dp) >> { >> - if (dp->phy) { >> + if (dp->phy) >> phy_power_on(dp->phy); >> - } else if (dp->phy_addr) { >> - u32 reg; >> - >> - reg = __raw_readl(dp->phy_addr); >> - reg |= dp->enable_mask; >> - __raw_writel(reg, dp->phy_addr); >> - } >> } >> >> static void exynos_dp_phy_exit(struct exynos_dp_device *dp) >> { >> - if (dp->phy) { >> + if (dp->phy) >> phy_power_off(dp->phy); >> - } else if (dp->phy_addr) { >> - u32 reg; >> - >> - reg = __raw_readl(dp->phy_addr); >> - reg &= ~(dp->enable_mask); >> - __raw_writel(reg, dp->phy_addr); >> - } >> } >> >> static void exynos_dp_poweron(struct exynos_drm_display *display) >> @@ -1210,39 +1196,21 @@ static struct video_info *exynos_dp_dt_parse_pdata(struct device *dev) >> >> static int exynos_dp_dt_parse_phydata(struct exynos_dp_device *dp) >> { >> - struct device_node *dp_phy_node = of_node_get(dp->dev->of_node); >> - u32 phy_base; >> int ret = 0; >> >> - dp_phy_node = of_find_node_by_name(dp_phy_node, "dptx-phy"); >> - if (!dp_phy_node) { >> - dp->phy = devm_phy_get(dp->dev, "dp"); >> - return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(dp->phy); >> - } >> - >> - if (of_property_read_u32(dp_phy_node, "reg", &phy_base)) { >> - dev_err(dp->dev, "failed to get reg for dptx-phy\n"); >> - ret = -EINVAL; >> - goto err; >> - } >> - >> - if (of_property_read_u32(dp_phy_node, "samsung,enable-mask", >> - &dp->enable_mask)) { >> - dev_err(dp->dev, "failed to get enable-mask for dptx-phy\n"); >> - ret = -EINVAL; >> - goto err; >> - } >> - >> - dp->phy_addr = ioremap(phy_base, SZ_4); >> - if (!dp->phy_addr) { >> - dev_err(dp->dev, "failed to ioremap dp-phy\n"); >> - ret = -ENOMEM; >> - goto err; >> + dp->phy = devm_phy_get(dp->dev, "dp"); >> + if (IS_ERR(dp->phy)) { >> + ret = PTR_ERR(dp->phy); >> + if (ret == -ENOSYS || ret == -ENODEV) { >> + dp->phy = NULL; >> + } else if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) { >> + return ret; >> + } else { > > WARNING: else is not generally useful after a break or return > #146: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c:1208: > + return ret; > + } else { > > How about just returning ret like below? > if (IS_ERR(dp->phy)) { > dev_err(dp->dev, "no DP phy configured\n"); > return PTR_ERR(ret); > } > > And then you can handle the error at probe function properly. Right, point taken. Will post the reworked patch. [snip]
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c index 4f3c7eb..5ffc1b2 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c @@ -1050,28 +1050,14 @@ static int exynos_dp_create_connector(struct exynos_drm_display *display, static void exynos_dp_phy_init(struct exynos_dp_device *dp) { - if (dp->phy) { + if (dp->phy) phy_power_on(dp->phy); - } else if (dp->phy_addr) { - u32 reg; - - reg = __raw_readl(dp->phy_addr); - reg |= dp->enable_mask; - __raw_writel(reg, dp->phy_addr); - } } static void exynos_dp_phy_exit(struct exynos_dp_device *dp) { - if (dp->phy) { + if (dp->phy) phy_power_off(dp->phy); - } else if (dp->phy_addr) { - u32 reg; - - reg = __raw_readl(dp->phy_addr); - reg &= ~(dp->enable_mask); - __raw_writel(reg, dp->phy_addr); - } } static void exynos_dp_poweron(struct exynos_drm_display *display) @@ -1210,39 +1196,21 @@ static struct video_info *exynos_dp_dt_parse_pdata(struct device *dev) static int exynos_dp_dt_parse_phydata(struct exynos_dp_device *dp) { - struct device_node *dp_phy_node = of_node_get(dp->dev->of_node); - u32 phy_base; int ret = 0; - dp_phy_node = of_find_node_by_name(dp_phy_node, "dptx-phy"); - if (!dp_phy_node) { - dp->phy = devm_phy_get(dp->dev, "dp"); - return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(dp->phy); - } - - if (of_property_read_u32(dp_phy_node, "reg", &phy_base)) { - dev_err(dp->dev, "failed to get reg for dptx-phy\n"); - ret = -EINVAL; - goto err; - } - - if (of_property_read_u32(dp_phy_node, "samsung,enable-mask", - &dp->enable_mask)) { - dev_err(dp->dev, "failed to get enable-mask for dptx-phy\n"); - ret = -EINVAL; - goto err; - } - - dp->phy_addr = ioremap(phy_base, SZ_4); - if (!dp->phy_addr) { - dev_err(dp->dev, "failed to ioremap dp-phy\n"); - ret = -ENOMEM; - goto err; + dp->phy = devm_phy_get(dp->dev, "dp"); + if (IS_ERR(dp->phy)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(dp->phy); + if (ret == -ENOSYS || ret == -ENODEV) { + dp->phy = NULL; + } else if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) { + return ret; + } else { + dev_err(dp->dev, "no DP phy configured\n"); + return ret; + } } -err: - of_node_put(dp_phy_node); - return ret; } diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h index a1aee69..6426201 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h @@ -153,8 +153,6 @@ struct exynos_dp_device { struct clk *clock; unsigned int irq; void __iomem *reg_base; - void __iomem *phy_addr; - unsigned int enable_mask; struct video_info *video_info; struct link_train link_train;
Now that we have moved to generic phy based bindings, we don't need to have any code related to older dptx-phy. Nobody is using this dptx-phy anymore, so removing the same. Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@samsung.com> Cc: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c | 58 +++++++------------------------ drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h | 2 -- 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)