@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ config DRM_MSM
tristate "MSM DRM"
depends on DRM
depends on ARCH_QCOM || (ARM && COMPILE_TEST)
+ select REGULATOR
select DRM_KMS_HELPER
select DRM_PANEL
select SHMEM
@@ -381,6 +381,10 @@ struct msm_kms *mdp4_kms_init(struct drm_device *dev)
if (IS_ERR(mdp4_kms->dsi_pll_vddio))
mdp4_kms->dsi_pll_vddio = NULL;
+ /* NOTE: driver for this regulator still missing upstream.. use
+ * _get_exclusive() and ignore the error if it does not exist
+ * (and hope that the bootloader left it on for us)
+ */
mdp4_kms->vdd = devm_regulator_get_exclusive(&pdev->dev, "vdd");
if (IS_ERR(mdp4_kms->vdd))
mdp4_kms->vdd = NULL;
Fixes a potential error, spotted by Felipe with randconfig: ----- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/mdp/mdp4/mdp4_kms.c: In function ‘mdp4_kms_init’: drivers/gpu/drm/msm/mdp/mdp4/mdp4_kms.c:384:2: error: implicit declaration \ of function ‘devm_regulator_get_exclusive’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] mdp4_kms->vdd = devm_regulator_get_exclusive(&pdev->dev, "vdd"); ^ drivers/gpu/drm/msm/mdp/mdp4/mdp4_kms.c:384:16: error: assignment makes \ pointer from integer without a cast [-Werror] mdp4_kms->vdd = devm_regulator_get_exclusive(&pdev->dev, "vdd"); ^ ----- Also add a brief comment explaining the use of _get_exclusive() Reported-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> --- Was planning to include this for my 3.19 pull req, but wanted to check if anyone had any comments. I tried 'depends on REGULATOR' but that was massive circular dependency hell via fbdev stuff. drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/msm/mdp/mdp4/mdp4_kms.c | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)