| Message ID | 1427744248-3599-1-git-send-email-leo.liu@amd.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
How will userspace know that it's safe to use this command on a particular kernel? Normally the driver's drm version is incremented, and then userspace is gated it... Or does this not matter here? On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Leo Liu <leo.liu@amd.com> wrote: > Signed-off-by: Leo Liu <leo.liu@amd.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_vce.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_vce.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_vce.c > index 976fe43..24f849f 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_vce.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_vce.c > @@ -571,6 +571,7 @@ int radeon_vce_cs_parse(struct radeon_cs_parser *p) > case 0x04000005: // rate control > case 0x04000007: // motion estimation > case 0x04000008: // rdo > + case 0x04000009: // vui > break; > > case 0x03000001: // encode > -- > 2.1.0 > > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_vce.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_vce.c index 976fe43..24f849f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_vce.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_vce.c @@ -571,6 +571,7 @@ int radeon_vce_cs_parse(struct radeon_cs_parser *p) case 0x04000005: // rate control case 0x04000007: // motion estimation case 0x04000008: // rdo + case 0x04000009: // vui break; case 0x03000001: // encode
Signed-off-by: Leo Liu <leo.liu@amd.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_vce.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)