diff mbox series

[15/18] vfio/gvt: Make DRM_I915_GVT depend on VFIO_MDEV

Message ID 15-v1-7dedf20b2b75+4f785-vfio2_jgg@nvidia.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series Make vfio_mdev type safe | expand

Commit Message

Jason Gunthorpe March 23, 2021, 5:55 p.m. UTC
At some point there may have been some reason for this weird split in this
driver, but today only the VFIO side is actually implemented.

However, it got messed up at some point and mdev code was put in gvt.c and
is pretending to be "generic" by masquerading as some generic attribute list:

   static MDEV_TYPE_ATTR_RO(description);

But MDEV_TYPE attributes are only usable with mdev_device, nothing else.

Ideally all of this would be moved to kvmgt.c, but it is entangled with
the rest of the "generic" code in an odd way. Thus put in a kconfig
dependency so we don't get randconfig failures when the next patch creates
a link time dependency related to the use of MDEV_TYPE.

Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Kconfig | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Comments

Jason Gunthorpe March 23, 2021, 7:39 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 08:26:30PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 02:55:32PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > Ideally all of this would be moved to kvmgt.c, but it is entangled with
> > the rest of the "generic" code in an odd way. Thus put in a kconfig
> > dependency so we don't get randconfig failures when the next patch creates
> > a link time dependency related to the use of MDEV_TYPE.
> 
> Ideally that weird struct intel_gvt_mpt would go away entirely.  But
> that is clearly out of scope for this patchset..

Yes.. Maybe someone from Intel will take that on, along with that
other note you had. Compared to all the others this driver is quite
twisty!

Jason
Tian, Kevin March 26, 2021, 6:03 a.m. UTC | #2
> From: Jason Gunthorpe
> Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2021 1:56 AM
> 
> At some point there may have been some reason for this weird split in this
> driver, but today only the VFIO side is actually implemented.
> 
> However, it got messed up at some point and mdev code was put in gvt.c and
> is pretending to be "generic" by masquerading as some generic attribute list:
> 
>    static MDEV_TYPE_ATTR_RO(description);
> 
> But MDEV_TYPE attributes are only usable with mdev_device, nothing else.
> 
> Ideally all of this would be moved to kvmgt.c, but it is entangled with
> the rest of the "generic" code in an odd way. Thus put in a kconfig
> dependency so we don't get randconfig failures when the next patch creates
> a link time dependency related to the use of MDEV_TYPE.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>

Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Kconfig | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Kconfig
> index 1e1cb245fca778..483e9ff8ca1d23 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Kconfig
> @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ config DRM_I915_GVT
>  	bool "Enable Intel GVT-g graphics virtualization host support"
>  	depends on DRM_I915
>  	depends on 64BIT
> +	depends on VFIO_MDEV
>  	default n
>  	help
>  	  Choose this option if you want to enable Intel GVT-g graphics
> --
> 2.31.0
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Zhenyu Wang March 30, 2021, 4:39 a.m. UTC | #3
On 2021.03.23 16:39:36 -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 08:26:30PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 02:55:32PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > Ideally all of this would be moved to kvmgt.c, but it is entangled with
> > > the rest of the "generic" code in an odd way. Thus put in a kconfig
> > > dependency so we don't get randconfig failures when the next patch creates
> > > a link time dependency related to the use of MDEV_TYPE.
> > 
> > Ideally that weird struct intel_gvt_mpt would go away entirely.  But
> > that is clearly out of scope for this patchset..
> 
> Yes.. Maybe someone from Intel will take that on, along with that
> other note you had. Compared to all the others this driver is quite
> twisty!
> 

It was there for other hypervisor support, although XenGT support was
never upstream, but there's also some third-party hypervisor using GVT
device model.

For vGPU type, it planned to be used for XenGT as well, but it turned
out not to be true, yeah, I agree that should be in kvmgt.c and mdev only.
Thanks to point out this. Until to clean up this, I may pick this one first.

Thanks
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Kconfig
index 1e1cb245fca778..483e9ff8ca1d23 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Kconfig
@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@  config DRM_I915_GVT
 	bool "Enable Intel GVT-g graphics virtualization host support"
 	depends on DRM_I915
 	depends on 64BIT
+	depends on VFIO_MDEV
 	default n
 	help
 	  Choose this option if you want to enable Intel GVT-g graphics