Message ID | 1616403070-35776-1-git-send-email-yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | drm/omap: dsi: Add missing IRQF_ONESHOT | expand |
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 at 09:53, Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com> wrote: > > fixed the following coccicheck: > ./drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dsi.c:4329:7-27: ERROR: Threaded IRQ with > no primary handler requested without IRQF_ONESHOT > > Make sure threaded IRQs without a primary handler are always request > with IRQF_ONESHOT > > Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> > Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dsi.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dsi.c > index b31d750..844cb0b 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dsi.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dsi.c > @@ -4326,7 +4326,7 @@ static int omap_dsi_register_te_irq(struct dsi_data *dsi, > > irq_set_status_flags(te_irq, IRQ_NOAUTOEN); > > - err = request_threaded_irq(te_irq, NULL, omap_dsi_te_irq_handler, > + err = request_threaded_irq(te_irq | IRQF_ONESHOT, NULL, omap_dsi_te_irq_handler, > IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING, "TE", dsi); Did you test it? There are several patches like this all over the tree so it looks like "let's fix everything from Coccinelle". It's a trend recently... multiple people send these patches. The point is that you should not blindly follow coccinelle but adjust the change for real case (e.g. is it a nested interrupt). Without this consideration and testing - NACK. Best regards, Krzysztof
I am so sorry for my mistakes. I am a newbie trying to learn how to fix errors found by Coccinelle. Currently, I just run scripts/checkpatch.pl. I will do basic build with the patch before sending it in the next time. Thank you for your advice. ------------------------------------------------------------------ 发件人:Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> 发送时间:2021年4月16日(星期五) 17:07 收件人:Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com> 抄 送:tomba <tomba@kernel.org>; airlied <airlied@linux.ie>; daniel <daniel@ffwll.ch>; dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> 主 题:Re: [PATCH] drm/omap: dsi: Add missing IRQF_ONESHOT On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 at 09:53, Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com> wrote: > > fixed the following coccicheck: > ./drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dsi.c:4329:7-27: ERROR: Threaded IRQ with > no primary handler requested without IRQF_ONESHOT > > Make sure threaded IRQs without a primary handler are always request > with IRQF_ONESHOT > > Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> > Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dsi.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dsi.c > index b31d750..844cb0b 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dsi.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dsi.c > @@ -4326,7 +4326,7 @@ static int omap_dsi_register_te_irq(struct dsi_data *dsi, > > irq_set_status_flags(te_irq, IRQ_NOAUTOEN); > > - err = request_threaded_irq(te_irq, NULL, omap_dsi_te_irq_handler, > + err = request_threaded_irq(te_irq | IRQF_ONESHOT, NULL, omap_dsi_te_irq_handler, > IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING, "TE", dsi); Did you test it? There are several patches like this all over the tree so it looks like "let's fix everything from Coccinelle". It's a trend recently... multiple people send these patches. The point is that you should not blindly follow coccinelle but adjust the change for real case (e.g. is it a nested interrupt). Without this consideration and testing - NACK. Best regards, Krzysztof
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dsi.c index b31d750..844cb0b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dsi.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dsi.c @@ -4326,7 +4326,7 @@ static int omap_dsi_register_te_irq(struct dsi_data *dsi, irq_set_status_flags(te_irq, IRQ_NOAUTOEN); - err = request_threaded_irq(te_irq, NULL, omap_dsi_te_irq_handler, + err = request_threaded_irq(te_irq | IRQF_ONESHOT, NULL, omap_dsi_te_irq_handler, IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING, "TE", dsi); if (err) { dev_err(dsi->dev, "request irq failed with %d\n", err);
fixed the following coccicheck: ./drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dsi.c:4329:7-27: ERROR: Threaded IRQ with no primary handler requested without IRQF_ONESHOT Make sure threaded IRQs without a primary handler are always request with IRQF_ONESHOT Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dsi.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)