diff mbox

gma500: clean up an excessive and confusing helper

Message ID 20160129193731.8475.47809.stgit@localhost.localdomain (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Alan Cox Jan. 29, 2016, 7:37 p.m. UTC
From: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>

This is a left over from the great clean ups in the past. It's confusing as
it returns an int, yet has one caller that never uses it. The caller already
has all the right private variables local so the entire function can be
replaced by a simple if call.

Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/framebuffer.c |   20 ++++----------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

Comments

Patrik Jakobsson Feb. 1, 2016, 8:11 a.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Alan <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> From: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
>
> This is a left over from the great clean ups in the past. It's confusing as
> it returns an int, yet has one caller that never uses it. The caller already
> has all the right private variables local so the entire function can be
> replaced by a simple if call.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>

Signed-off-by: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.r.jakobsson@gmail.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/framebuffer.c |   20 ++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/framebuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/framebuffer.c
> index cb95765..033d894 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/framebuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/framebuffer.c
> @@ -674,29 +674,17 @@ static const struct drm_mode_config_funcs psb_mode_funcs = {
>         .output_poll_changed = psbfb_output_poll_changed,
>  };
>
> -static int psb_create_backlight_property(struct drm_device *dev)
> -{
> -       struct drm_psb_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> -       struct drm_property *backlight;
> -
> -       if (dev_priv->backlight_property)
> -               return 0;
> -
> -       backlight = drm_property_create_range(dev, 0, "backlight", 0, 100);
> -
> -       dev_priv->backlight_property = backlight;
> -
> -       return 0;
> -}
> -
>  static void psb_setup_outputs(struct drm_device *dev)
>  {
>         struct drm_psb_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>         struct drm_connector *connector;
>
>         drm_mode_create_scaling_mode_property(dev);
> -       psb_create_backlight_property(dev);
>
> +       /* It is ok for this to fail - we just don't get backlight control */
> +       if (!dev_priv->backlight_property)
> +               dev_priv->backlight_property = drm_property_create_range(dev, 0,
> +                                                       "backlight", 0, 100);
>         dev_priv->ops->output_init(dev);
>
>         list_for_each_entry(connector, &dev->mode_config.connector_list,
>
Daniel Vetter Feb. 8, 2016, 9:07 a.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 09:11:51AM +0100, Patrik Jakobsson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Alan <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> > From: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > This is a left over from the great clean ups in the past. It's confusing as
> > it returns an int, yet has one caller that never uses it. The caller already
> > has all the right private variables local so the entire function can be
> > replaced by a simple if call.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.r.jakobsson@gmail.com>

Applied to drm-misc, thanks.
-Daniel

> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/framebuffer.c |   20 ++++----------------
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/framebuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/framebuffer.c
> > index cb95765..033d894 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/framebuffer.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/framebuffer.c
> > @@ -674,29 +674,17 @@ static const struct drm_mode_config_funcs psb_mode_funcs = {
> >         .output_poll_changed = psbfb_output_poll_changed,
> >  };
> >
> > -static int psb_create_backlight_property(struct drm_device *dev)
> > -{
> > -       struct drm_psb_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> > -       struct drm_property *backlight;
> > -
> > -       if (dev_priv->backlight_property)
> > -               return 0;
> > -
> > -       backlight = drm_property_create_range(dev, 0, "backlight", 0, 100);
> > -
> > -       dev_priv->backlight_property = backlight;
> > -
> > -       return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> >  static void psb_setup_outputs(struct drm_device *dev)
> >  {
> >         struct drm_psb_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> >         struct drm_connector *connector;
> >
> >         drm_mode_create_scaling_mode_property(dev);
> > -       psb_create_backlight_property(dev);
> >
> > +       /* It is ok for this to fail - we just don't get backlight control */
> > +       if (!dev_priv->backlight_property)
> > +               dev_priv->backlight_property = drm_property_create_range(dev, 0,
> > +                                                       "backlight", 0, 100);
> >         dev_priv->ops->output_init(dev);
> >
> >         list_for_each_entry(connector, &dev->mode_config.connector_list,
> >
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/framebuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/framebuffer.c
index cb95765..033d894 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/framebuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/framebuffer.c
@@ -674,29 +674,17 @@  static const struct drm_mode_config_funcs psb_mode_funcs = {
 	.output_poll_changed = psbfb_output_poll_changed,
 };
 
-static int psb_create_backlight_property(struct drm_device *dev)
-{
-	struct drm_psb_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
-	struct drm_property *backlight;
-
-	if (dev_priv->backlight_property)
-		return 0;
-
-	backlight = drm_property_create_range(dev, 0, "backlight", 0, 100);
-
-	dev_priv->backlight_property = backlight;
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
 static void psb_setup_outputs(struct drm_device *dev)
 {
 	struct drm_psb_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
 	struct drm_connector *connector;
 
 	drm_mode_create_scaling_mode_property(dev);
-	psb_create_backlight_property(dev);
 
+	/* It is ok for this to fail - we just don't get backlight control */
+	if (!dev_priv->backlight_property)
+		dev_priv->backlight_property = drm_property_create_range(dev, 0,
+							"backlight", 0, 100);
 	dev_priv->ops->output_init(dev);
 
 	list_for_each_entry(connector, &dev->mode_config.connector_list,