@@ -222,6 +222,21 @@ static void drm_update_vblank_count(stru
}
/*
+ * Within a drm_vblank_pre_modeset - drm_vblank_post_modeset
+ * interval? If so then vblank irqs keep running and it will likely
+ * happen that the hardware vblank counter is not trustworthy as it
+ * might reset at some point in that interval and vblank timestamps
+ * are not trustworthy either in that interval. Iow. this can result
+ * in a bogus diff >> 1 which must be avoided as it would cause
+ * random large forward jumps of the software vblank counter.
+ */
+ if (diff > 1 && (vblank->inmodeset & 0x2)) {
+ DRM_DEBUG_VBL("clamping vblank bump to 1 on crtc %u: diffr=%u"
+ " due to pre-modeset.\n", pipe, diff);
+ diff = 1;
+ }
+
+ /*
* FIMXE: Need to replace this hack with proper seqlocks.
*
* Restrict the bump of the software vblank counter to a safe maximum
@@ -1575,6 +1590,7 @@ void drm_vblank_post_modeset(struct drm_
if (vblank->inmodeset) {
spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->vbl_lock, irqflags);
dev->vblank_disable_allowed = true;
+ drm_reset_vblank_timestamp(dev, pipe);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->vbl_lock, irqflags);
if (vblank->inmodeset & 0x2)