diff mbox

drm: Fix error handling in drm_mm eviction kselftest

Message ID 20170110144031.7609-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Chris Wilson Jan. 10, 2017, 2:40 p.m. UTC
drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/test-drm_mm.c:1277 evict_everything()
        warn: calling list_del() inside list_for_each

The list_del() inside the error handling in the eviction loop is
overkill. We have to undo the eviction scan to return the drm_mm back to
a recoverable state, so have to iterate over the full list, but we only
want to report the error once and once we have an error we can return
early.

Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Fixes: 560b32842912 ("drm: kselftest for drm_mm and eviction")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/test-drm_mm.c | 12 +++++++++---
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Joonas Lahtinen Jan. 11, 2017, 6:54 a.m. UTC | #1
On ti, 2017-01-10 at 14:40 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
>         drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/test-drm_mm.c:1277 evict_everything()
>         warn: calling list_del() inside list_for_each
> 
> The list_del() inside the error handling in the eviction loop is
> overkill. We have to undo the eviction scan to return the drm_mm back to
> a recoverable state, so have to iterate over the full list, but we only
> want to report the error once and once we have an error we can return
> early.
> 
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> Fixes: 560b32842912 ("drm: kselftest for drm_mm and eviction")
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Ah, as mentioned previously, we soon need tests for the selftests :)

Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

Regards, Joonas
Daniel Vetter Jan. 11, 2017, 7:54 a.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 08:54:35AM +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> On ti, 2017-01-10 at 14:40 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >         drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/test-drm_mm.c:1277 evict_everything()
> >         warn: calling list_del() inside list_for_each
> > 
> > The list_del() inside the error handling in the eviction loop is
> > overkill. We have to undo the eviction scan to return the drm_mm back to
> > a recoverable state, so have to iterate over the full list, but we only
> > want to report the error once and once we have an error we can return
> > early.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> > Fixes: 560b32842912 ("drm: kselftest for drm_mm and eviction")
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> 
> Ah, as mentioned previously, we soon need tests for the selftests :)
> 
> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

Applied, thanks.
-Daniel
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/test-drm_mm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/test-drm_mm.c
index ab091042f317..1e71bc182ca9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/test-drm_mm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/test-drm_mm.c
@@ -1272,13 +1272,19 @@  static bool evict_everything(struct drm_mm *mm,
 		if (drm_mm_scan_add_block(&scan, &e->node))
 			break;
 	}
+
+	err = 0;
 	list_for_each_entry(e, &evict_list, link) {
 		if (!drm_mm_scan_remove_block(&scan, &e->node)) {
-			pr_err("Node %lld not marked for eviction!\n",
-			       e->node.start);
-			list_del(&e->link);
+			if (!err) {
+				pr_err("Node %lld not marked for eviction!\n",
+				       e->node.start);
+				err = -EINVAL;
+			}
 		}
 	}
+	if (err)
+		return false;
 
 	list_for_each_entry(e, &evict_list, link)
 		drm_mm_remove_node(&e->node);