Message ID | 20171127111728.1710742-1-arnd@arndb.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 12:17:03PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The normal DRM vblank interrupt events started using monotonic times in > commit c61eef726a78 ("drm: add support for monotonic vblank timestamps"), > which is useful for a number of reasons, including the possible y2038 > overflow. > > The VIA_WAIT_IRQ ioctl uses the same drm_wait_vblank_reply as > DRM_IOCTL_WAIT_VBLANK, but still uses wall-clock time. > > This converts it to using monotonic time as well, which is more > consistent, and avoids problems with the y2038 overflow as well > as synchronization issues when the real time skips. > > I could not find the matching user space that calls the VIA_WAIT_IRQ > ioctl to verify that this is safe, but it very likely is. Please > either test or review the user space side before applying this. You need to check out _seriously_ old versions of mesa and X (plus it's drivers). Git ftw. The only caller I've found (in the Xv implementation of the via/openchrome ddx) doesn't even care about the timestamp. I'm mildly tempted to just report 0 always, but via isn't worth that much bother really. Applied, thanks for the patch. -Daniel > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_irq.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_irq.c > index 24e71578af4d..c96830ccc0ec 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_irq.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_irq.c > @@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ void via_driver_irq_uninstall(struct drm_device *dev) > int via_wait_irq(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file_priv) > { > drm_via_irqwait_t *irqwait = data; > - struct timeval now; > + struct timespec64 now; > int ret = 0; > drm_via_private_t *dev_priv = (drm_via_private_t *) dev->dev_private; > drm_via_irq_t *cur_irq = dev_priv->via_irqs; > @@ -377,9 +377,9 @@ int via_wait_irq(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file_priv) > > ret = via_driver_irq_wait(dev, irqwait->request.irq, force_sequence, > &irqwait->request.sequence); > - do_gettimeofday(&now); > + ktime_get_ts64(&now); > irqwait->reply.tval_sec = now.tv_sec; > - irqwait->reply.tval_usec = now.tv_usec; > + irqwait->reply.tval_usec = now.tv_nsec / NSEC_PER_USEC; > > return ret; > } > -- > 2.9.0 > > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_irq.c index 24e71578af4d..c96830ccc0ec 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_irq.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_irq.c @@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ void via_driver_irq_uninstall(struct drm_device *dev) int via_wait_irq(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file_priv) { drm_via_irqwait_t *irqwait = data; - struct timeval now; + struct timespec64 now; int ret = 0; drm_via_private_t *dev_priv = (drm_via_private_t *) dev->dev_private; drm_via_irq_t *cur_irq = dev_priv->via_irqs; @@ -377,9 +377,9 @@ int via_wait_irq(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file_priv) ret = via_driver_irq_wait(dev, irqwait->request.irq, force_sequence, &irqwait->request.sequence); - do_gettimeofday(&now); + ktime_get_ts64(&now); irqwait->reply.tval_sec = now.tv_sec; - irqwait->reply.tval_usec = now.tv_usec; + irqwait->reply.tval_usec = now.tv_nsec / NSEC_PER_USEC; return ret; }
The normal DRM vblank interrupt events started using monotonic times in commit c61eef726a78 ("drm: add support for monotonic vblank timestamps"), which is useful for a number of reasons, including the possible y2038 overflow. The VIA_WAIT_IRQ ioctl uses the same drm_wait_vblank_reply as DRM_IOCTL_WAIT_VBLANK, but still uses wall-clock time. This converts it to using monotonic time as well, which is more consistent, and avoids problems with the y2038 overflow as well as synchronization issues when the real time skips. I could not find the matching user space that calls the VIA_WAIT_IRQ ioctl to verify that this is safe, but it very likely is. Please either test or review the user space side before applying this. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> --- drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_irq.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)