| Message ID | 20180110141226.27826-2-linus.walleij@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 03:12:24PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > After some discussion and failed patch sets trying to convey > the right timing information between the display engine and > a bridge using the connector, I try instead to use an optional > timing information container in the bridge itself, so that > display engines can retrieve it from any bridge and use it to > determine how to drive outputs. > > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> > --- > ChangeLog v5->v6: > - Sort forward struct declarations alphabetically > - Switch to using DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_[POS|NEG]EDGE to indicate > positive or negatice clock samling edge > ChangeLog ->v5: > - New patch > --- > include/drm/drm_bridge.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_bridge.h b/include/drm/drm_bridge.h > index 682d01ba920c..28c9ac6d9036 100644 > --- a/include/drm/drm_bridge.h > +++ b/include/drm/drm_bridge.h > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ > #include <drm/drm_modes.h> > > struct drm_bridge; > +struct drm_bridge_timings; > struct drm_panel; > > /** > @@ -222,6 +223,23 @@ struct drm_bridge_funcs { > void (*enable)(struct drm_bridge *bridge); > }; > > +/** > + * struct drm_bridge_timings - timing information for the bridge > + * @sampling_edge: whether the bridge samples the digital input signal from the > + * display engine on the positive or negative edge of the clock, this should > + * reuse the DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_[POS|NEG]EDGE bitwise flags from the DRM > + * connector (bit 2 and 3 valid) > + * @setup_time_ps: the time in picoseconds the input data lines must be stable > + * before the clock edge > + * @hold_time_ps: the time in picoseconds taken for the bridge to sample the > + * input signal after the clock edge > + */ Just a style nit: for longer kerneldoc comments for struct members the in-line style, split up for each member, is imo better. -Daniel > +struct drm_bridge_timings { > + u32 sampling_edge; > + u32 setup_time_ps; > + u32 hold_time_ps; > +}; > + > /** > * struct drm_bridge - central DRM bridge control structure > * @dev: DRM device this bridge belongs to > @@ -229,6 +247,8 @@ struct drm_bridge_funcs { > * @next: the next bridge in the encoder chain > * @of_node: device node pointer to the bridge > * @list: to keep track of all added bridges > + * @timings: the timing specification for the bridge, if any (may > + * be NULL) > * @funcs: control functions > * @driver_private: pointer to the bridge driver's internal context > */ > @@ -240,6 +260,7 @@ struct drm_bridge { > struct device_node *of_node; > #endif > struct list_head list; > + const struct drm_bridge_timings *timings; > > const struct drm_bridge_funcs *funcs; > void *driver_private; > -- > 2.14.3 > > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> writes: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 03:12:24PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: >> After some discussion and failed patch sets trying to convey >> the right timing information between the display engine and >> a bridge using the connector, I try instead to use an optional >> timing information container in the bridge itself, so that >> display engines can retrieve it from any bridge and use it to >> determine how to drive outputs. >> >> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> >> --- >> ChangeLog v5->v6: >> - Sort forward struct declarations alphabetically >> - Switch to using DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_[POS|NEG]EDGE to indicate >> positive or negatice clock samling edge >> ChangeLog ->v5: >> - New patch >> --- >> include/drm/drm_bridge.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_bridge.h b/include/drm/drm_bridge.h >> index 682d01ba920c..28c9ac6d9036 100644 >> --- a/include/drm/drm_bridge.h >> +++ b/include/drm/drm_bridge.h >> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ >> #include <drm/drm_modes.h> >> >> struct drm_bridge; >> +struct drm_bridge_timings; >> struct drm_panel; >> >> /** >> @@ -222,6 +223,23 @@ struct drm_bridge_funcs { >> void (*enable)(struct drm_bridge *bridge); >> }; >> >> +/** >> + * struct drm_bridge_timings - timing information for the bridge >> + * @sampling_edge: whether the bridge samples the digital input signal from the >> + * display engine on the positive or negative edge of the clock, this should >> + * reuse the DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_[POS|NEG]EDGE bitwise flags from the DRM >> + * connector (bit 2 and 3 valid) >> + * @setup_time_ps: the time in picoseconds the input data lines must be stable >> + * before the clock edge >> + * @hold_time_ps: the time in picoseconds taken for the bridge to sample the >> + * input signal after the clock edge >> + */ > > Just a style nit: for longer kerneldoc comments for struct members the > in-line style, split up for each member, is imo better. > -Daniel The new style also discourages the comments getting out of sync with the code. I'd be happy to r-b with them moved.
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_bridge.h b/include/drm/drm_bridge.h index 682d01ba920c..28c9ac6d9036 100644 --- a/include/drm/drm_bridge.h +++ b/include/drm/drm_bridge.h @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ #include <drm/drm_modes.h> struct drm_bridge; +struct drm_bridge_timings; struct drm_panel; /** @@ -222,6 +223,23 @@ struct drm_bridge_funcs { void (*enable)(struct drm_bridge *bridge); }; +/** + * struct drm_bridge_timings - timing information for the bridge + * @sampling_edge: whether the bridge samples the digital input signal from the + * display engine on the positive or negative edge of the clock, this should + * reuse the DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_[POS|NEG]EDGE bitwise flags from the DRM + * connector (bit 2 and 3 valid) + * @setup_time_ps: the time in picoseconds the input data lines must be stable + * before the clock edge + * @hold_time_ps: the time in picoseconds taken for the bridge to sample the + * input signal after the clock edge + */ +struct drm_bridge_timings { + u32 sampling_edge; + u32 setup_time_ps; + u32 hold_time_ps; +}; + /** * struct drm_bridge - central DRM bridge control structure * @dev: DRM device this bridge belongs to @@ -229,6 +247,8 @@ struct drm_bridge_funcs { * @next: the next bridge in the encoder chain * @of_node: device node pointer to the bridge * @list: to keep track of all added bridges + * @timings: the timing specification for the bridge, if any (may + * be NULL) * @funcs: control functions * @driver_private: pointer to the bridge driver's internal context */ @@ -240,6 +260,7 @@ struct drm_bridge { struct device_node *of_node; #endif struct list_head list; + const struct drm_bridge_timings *timings; const struct drm_bridge_funcs *funcs; void *driver_private;
After some discussion and failed patch sets trying to convey the right timing information between the display engine and a bridge using the connector, I try instead to use an optional timing information container in the bridge itself, so that display engines can retrieve it from any bridge and use it to determine how to drive outputs. Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> --- ChangeLog v5->v6: - Sort forward struct declarations alphabetically - Switch to using DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_[POS|NEG]EDGE to indicate positive or negatice clock samling edge ChangeLog ->v5: - New patch --- include/drm/drm_bridge.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)