Message ID | 20180315162011.807909-1-arnd@arndb.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Hi Arnd, On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 17:19 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > gcc-8 reports that we access an array with a negative index > in an error case: > > drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-prg.c: In function 'ipu_prg_channel_disable': > drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-prg.c:252:43: error: array subscript -22 is below array bounds of 'struct ipu_prg_channel[3]' [-Werror=array-bounds] > > This moves the range check in front of the first time that > variable gets used. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> thank you, I've replaced v2 with this version in imx-drm/fixes. regards Philipp > ---- > v1: Originally sent on Dec 4, 2017. > v2: Sent again on Jan 16, after no reply, Phillipp said it was merged > v3: Ran into a related problem with CONFIG_UBSAN, sent again fixing both > --- > drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-prg.c | 12 +++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-prg.c b/drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-prg.c > index 97b99500153d..83f9dd934a5d 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-prg.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-prg.c > @@ -250,10 +250,14 @@ void ipu_prg_channel_disable(struct ipuv3_channel *ipu_chan) > { > int prg_chan = ipu_prg_ipu_to_prg_chan(ipu_chan->num); > struct ipu_prg *prg = ipu_chan->ipu->prg_priv; > - struct ipu_prg_channel *chan = &prg->chan[prg_chan]; > + struct ipu_prg_channel *chan; > u32 val; > > - if (!chan->enabled || prg_chan < 0) > + if (prg_chan < 0) > + return; > + > + chan = &prg->chan[prg_chan]; > + if (!chan->enabled) > return; > > pm_runtime_get_sync(prg->dev); > @@ -280,13 +284,15 @@ int ipu_prg_channel_configure(struct ipuv3_channel *ipu_chan, > { > int prg_chan = ipu_prg_ipu_to_prg_chan(ipu_chan->num); > struct ipu_prg *prg = ipu_chan->ipu->prg_priv; > - struct ipu_prg_channel *chan = &prg->chan[prg_chan]; > + struct ipu_prg_channel *chan; > u32 val; > int ret; > > if (prg_chan < 0) > return prg_chan; > > + chan = &prg->chan[prg_chan]; > + > if (chan->enabled) { > ipu_pre_update(prg->pres[chan->used_pre], *eba); > return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-prg.c b/drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-prg.c index 97b99500153d..83f9dd934a5d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-prg.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-prg.c @@ -250,10 +250,14 @@ void ipu_prg_channel_disable(struct ipuv3_channel *ipu_chan) { int prg_chan = ipu_prg_ipu_to_prg_chan(ipu_chan->num); struct ipu_prg *prg = ipu_chan->ipu->prg_priv; - struct ipu_prg_channel *chan = &prg->chan[prg_chan]; + struct ipu_prg_channel *chan; u32 val; - if (!chan->enabled || prg_chan < 0) + if (prg_chan < 0) + return; + + chan = &prg->chan[prg_chan]; + if (!chan->enabled) return; pm_runtime_get_sync(prg->dev); @@ -280,13 +284,15 @@ int ipu_prg_channel_configure(struct ipuv3_channel *ipu_chan, { int prg_chan = ipu_prg_ipu_to_prg_chan(ipu_chan->num); struct ipu_prg *prg = ipu_chan->ipu->prg_priv; - struct ipu_prg_channel *chan = &prg->chan[prg_chan]; + struct ipu_prg_channel *chan; u32 val; int ret; if (prg_chan < 0) return prg_chan; + chan = &prg->chan[prg_chan]; + if (chan->enabled) { ipu_pre_update(prg->pres[chan->used_pre], *eba); return 0;
gcc-8 reports that we access an array with a negative index in an error case: drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-prg.c: In function 'ipu_prg_channel_disable': drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-prg.c:252:43: error: array subscript -22 is below array bounds of 'struct ipu_prg_channel[3]' [-Werror=array-bounds] This moves the range check in front of the first time that variable gets used. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> ---- v1: Originally sent on Dec 4, 2017. v2: Sent again on Jan 16, after no reply, Phillipp said it was merged v3: Ran into a related problem with CONFIG_UBSAN, sent again fixing both --- drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-prg.c | 12 +++++++++--- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)