Message ID | 20181130022525.25676-8-jose.souza@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2,01/11] drm/i915: Disable PSR in Apple panels | expand |
On Thu, 2018-11-29 at 18:25 -0800, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > According to eDP spec, sink can required specific selective update > granularity that source must comply. > Here caching the value if required and checking if source supports > it. > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> > Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 + > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++- > 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > index 43ac6873a2bb..0727d8051dd3 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > @@ -507,6 +507,7 @@ struct i915_psr { > ktime_t last_exit; > bool sink_not_reliable; > bool irq_aux_error; > + u16 su_x_granularity; > }; > > enum intel_pch { > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c > index 282ff1bc68a7..f9eccaac850a 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c > @@ -261,6 +261,23 @@ static u8 intel_dp_get_sink_sync_latency(struct > intel_dp *intel_dp) > return val; > } > > +static u16 intel_dp_get_su_x_granulartiy(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) > +{ > + u16 val; > + ssize_t r; > + > + if (!(intel_dp->psr_dpcd[1] & DP_PSR2_SU_GRANULARITY_REQUIRED)) > { > + /* Returning the default X granularity */ > + return 4; > + } nit: Braces not needed, you could move the comment a line above. A value of 0 in this DPCD indicates there is no granularity requirement, why assume 4? > + > + r = drm_dp_dpcd_read(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR2_SU_X_GRANULARITY, > &val, 2); > + if (r != 2) > + DRM_WARN("Unable to read DP_PSR2_SU_X_GRANULARITY\n"); Please change this to the warning level that we use elsewhere for aux failures. If I'm reading the spec correctly, a value of 0 in this DPCD means the sink expects a granularity of 4, so returning 0 would be incorrect. > + > + return val; Assume the default value of 4 if aux read fails (after printing an error) > +} > + > void intel_psr_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) > { > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = > @@ -315,6 +332,8 @@ void intel_psr_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp > *intel_dp) > if (dev_priv->psr.sink_psr2_support) { > dev_priv->psr.colorimetry_support = > intel_dp_get_colorimetry_status(intel_d > p); > + dev_priv->psr.su_x_granularity = > + intel_dp_get_su_x_granulartiy(intel_dp) > ; > } > } > } > @@ -546,7 +565,7 @@ static bool intel_psr2_config_valid(struct > intel_dp *intel_dp, > * at each 4 lines with height of 4 lines, what eDP states > * that sink should support. > */ > - if (crtc_hdisplay % 4) { > + if (crtc_hdisplay % dev_priv->psr.su_x_granularity) { > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 not enabled, default SU granularity > not match\n"); > return false; > }
On Mon, 2018-12-03 at 12:59 -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > On Thu, 2018-11-29 at 18:25 -0800, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > > According to eDP spec, sink can required specific selective update > > granularity that source must comply. > > Here caching the value if required and checking if source supports > > it. > > > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> > > Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 + > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++- > > 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > index 43ac6873a2bb..0727d8051dd3 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > @@ -507,6 +507,7 @@ struct i915_psr { > > ktime_t last_exit; > > bool sink_not_reliable; > > bool irq_aux_error; > > + u16 su_x_granularity; > > }; > > > > enum intel_pch { > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c > > index 282ff1bc68a7..f9eccaac850a 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c > > @@ -261,6 +261,23 @@ static u8 > > intel_dp_get_sink_sync_latency(struct > > intel_dp *intel_dp) > > return val; > > } > > > > +static u16 intel_dp_get_su_x_granulartiy(struct intel_dp > > *intel_dp) > > +{ > > + u16 val; > > + ssize_t r; > > + > > + if (!(intel_dp->psr_dpcd[1] & DP_PSR2_SU_GRANULARITY_REQUIRED)) > > { > > + /* Returning the default X granularity */ > > + return 4; > > + } > nit: Braces not needed, you could move the comment a line above. > > A value of 0 in this DPCD indicates there is no granularity > requirement, why assume 4? Like you said bellow, 4 is the default granularity if this is not set. > > > + > > + r = drm_dp_dpcd_read(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR2_SU_X_GRANULARITY, > > &val, 2); > > + if (r != 2) > > + DRM_WARN("Unable to read DP_PSR2_SU_X_GRANULARITY\n"); > Please change this to the warning level that we use elsewhere for aux > failures. So changing to DRM_DEBUG_KMS() > > If I'm reading the spec correctly, a value of 0 in this DPCD means > the > sink expects a granularity of 4, so returning 0 would be incorrect. > > > + > > + return val; > Assume the default value of 4 if aux read fails (after printing an > error) > Done > > +} > > + > > void intel_psr_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) > > { > > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = > > @@ -315,6 +332,8 @@ void intel_psr_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp > > *intel_dp) > > if (dev_priv->psr.sink_psr2_support) { > > dev_priv->psr.colorimetry_support = > > intel_dp_get_colorimetry_status(intel_d > > p); > > + dev_priv->psr.su_x_granularity = > > + intel_dp_get_su_x_granulartiy(intel_dp) > > ; > > } > > } > > } > > @@ -546,7 +565,7 @@ static bool intel_psr2_config_valid(struct > > intel_dp *intel_dp, > > * at each 4 lines with height of 4 lines, what eDP states > > * that sink should support. > > */ > > - if (crtc_hdisplay % 4) { > > + if (crtc_hdisplay % dev_priv->psr.su_x_granularity) { > > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 not enabled, default SU granularity > > not match\n"); > > return false; > > }
On Mon, 2018-12-03 at 14:45 -0800, Souza, Jose wrote: > On Mon, 2018-12-03 at 12:59 -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > > On Thu, 2018-11-29 at 18:25 -0800, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > > > According to eDP spec, sink can required specific selective > > > update > > > granularity that source must comply. > > > Here caching the value if required and checking if source > > > supports > > > it. > > > > > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> > > > Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> > > > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 + > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++- > > > 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > > index 43ac6873a2bb..0727d8051dd3 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > > @@ -507,6 +507,7 @@ struct i915_psr { > > > ktime_t last_exit; > > > bool sink_not_reliable; > > > bool irq_aux_error; > > > + u16 su_x_granularity; > > > }; > > > > > > enum intel_pch { > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c > > > index 282ff1bc68a7..f9eccaac850a 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c > > > @@ -261,6 +261,23 @@ static u8 > > > intel_dp_get_sink_sync_latency(struct > > > intel_dp *intel_dp) > > > return val; > > > } > > > > > > +static u16 intel_dp_get_su_x_granulartiy(struct intel_dp > > > *intel_dp) > > > +{ > > > + u16 val; > > > + ssize_t r; > > > + > > > + if (!(intel_dp->psr_dpcd[1] & DP_PSR2_SU_GRANULARITY_REQUIRED)) > > > { > > > + /* Returning the default X granularity */ > > > + return 4; > > > + } > > > > nit: Braces not needed, you could move the comment a line above. > > > > A value of 0 in this DPCD indicates there is no granularity > > requirement, why assume 4? > > Like you said bellow, 4 is the default granularity if this is not > set. > The spec states 0 means no granularity requirements, return 1 here? > > > > > + > > > + r = drm_dp_dpcd_read(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR2_SU_X_GRANULARITY, > > > &val, 2); > > > + if (r != 2) > > > + DRM_WARN("Unable to read DP_PSR2_SU_X_GRANULARITY\n"); > > > > Please change this to the warning level that we use elsewhere for > > aux > > failures. > > So changing to DRM_DEBUG_KMS() > > > > > If I'm reading the spec correctly, a value of 0 in this DPCD means > > the > > sink expects a granularity of 4, so returning 0 would be incorrect. > > > > > + > > > + return val; > > > > Assume the default value of 4 if aux read fails (after printing an > > error) > > > > Done > > > > > +} > > > + > > > void intel_psr_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) > > > { > > > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = > > > @@ -315,6 +332,8 @@ void intel_psr_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp > > > *intel_dp) > > > if (dev_priv->psr.sink_psr2_support) { > > > dev_priv->psr.colorimetry_support = > > > intel_dp_get_colorimetry_status(intel_d > > > p); > > > + dev_priv->psr.su_x_granularity = > > > + intel_dp_get_su_x_granulartiy(intel_dp) > > > ; > > > } > > > } > > > } > > > @@ -546,7 +565,7 @@ static bool intel_psr2_config_valid(struct > > > intel_dp *intel_dp, > > > * at each 4 lines with height of 4 lines, what eDP states > > > * that sink should support. > > > */ > > > - if (crtc_hdisplay % 4) { > > > + if (crtc_hdisplay % dev_priv->psr.su_x_granularity) { > > > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 not enabled, default SU granularity > > > not match\n"); > > > return false; > > > }
On Mon, 2018-12-03 at 15:12 -0800, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote: > On Mon, 2018-12-03 at 14:45 -0800, Souza, Jose wrote: > > On Mon, 2018-12-03 at 12:59 -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > > > On Thu, 2018-11-29 at 18:25 -0800, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > > > > According to eDP spec, sink can required specific selective > > > > update > > > > granularity that source must comply. > > > > Here caching the value if required and checking if source > > > > supports > > > > it. > > > > > > > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> > > > > Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> > > > > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 + > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++- > > > > 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > > > index 43ac6873a2bb..0727d8051dd3 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > > > @@ -507,6 +507,7 @@ struct i915_psr { > > > > ktime_t last_exit; > > > > bool sink_not_reliable; > > > > bool irq_aux_error; > > > > + u16 su_x_granularity; > > > > }; > > > > > > > > enum intel_pch { > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c > > > > index 282ff1bc68a7..f9eccaac850a 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c > > > > @@ -261,6 +261,23 @@ static u8 > > > > intel_dp_get_sink_sync_latency(struct > > > > intel_dp *intel_dp) > > > > return val; > > > > } > > > > > > > > +static u16 intel_dp_get_su_x_granulartiy(struct intel_dp > > > > *intel_dp) > > > > +{ > > > > + u16 val; > > > > + ssize_t r; > > > > + > > > > + if (!(intel_dp->psr_dpcd[1] & > > > > DP_PSR2_SU_GRANULARITY_REQUIRED)) > > > > { > > > > + /* Returning the default X granularity */ > > > > + return 4; > > > > + } > > > > > > nit: Braces not needed, you could move the comment a line above. > > > > > > A value of 0 in this DPCD indicates there is no granularity > > > requirement, why assume 4? > > > > Like you said bellow, 4 is the default granularity if this is not > > set. > > > The spec states 0 means no granularity requirements, return 1 here? A value of 0 indicates that no X-coordinate granularity requirement exists other than the standard restrictions, wherein the: Starting X-coordinate must be evenly divisible by 16 Rectangle width must be evenly divisible by 4 > > > > > + > > > > + r = drm_dp_dpcd_read(&intel_dp->aux, > > > > DP_PSR2_SU_X_GRANULARITY, > > > > &val, 2); > > > > + if (r != 2) > > > > + DRM_WARN("Unable to read > > > > DP_PSR2_SU_X_GRANULARITY\n"); > > > > > > Please change this to the warning level that we use elsewhere for > > > aux > > > failures. > > > > So changing to DRM_DEBUG_KMS() > > > > > If I'm reading the spec correctly, a value of 0 in this DPCD > > > means > > > the > > > sink expects a granularity of 4, so returning 0 would be > > > incorrect. > > > > > > > + > > > > + return val; > > > > > > Assume the default value of 4 if aux read fails (after printing > > > an > > > error) > > > > > > > Done > > > > > > > > +} > > > > + > > > > void intel_psr_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) > > > > { > > > > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = > > > > @@ -315,6 +332,8 @@ void intel_psr_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp > > > > *intel_dp) > > > > if (dev_priv->psr.sink_psr2_support) { > > > > dev_priv->psr.colorimetry_support = > > > > intel_dp_get_colorimetry_status > > > > (intel_d > > > > p); > > > > + dev_priv->psr.su_x_granularity = > > > > + intel_dp_get_su_x_granulartiy(i > > > > ntel_dp) > > > > ; > > > > } > > > > } > > > > } > > > > @@ -546,7 +565,7 @@ static bool intel_psr2_config_valid(struct > > > > intel_dp *intel_dp, > > > > * at each 4 lines with height of 4 lines, what eDP > > > > states > > > > * that sink should support. > > > > */ > > > > - if (crtc_hdisplay % 4) { > > > > + if (crtc_hdisplay % dev_priv->psr.su_x_granularity) { > > > > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 not enabled, default SU > > > > granularity > > > > not match\n"); > > > > return false; > > > > }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h index 43ac6873a2bb..0727d8051dd3 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h @@ -507,6 +507,7 @@ struct i915_psr { ktime_t last_exit; bool sink_not_reliable; bool irq_aux_error; + u16 su_x_granularity; }; enum intel_pch { diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c index 282ff1bc68a7..f9eccaac850a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c @@ -261,6 +261,23 @@ static u8 intel_dp_get_sink_sync_latency(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) return val; } +static u16 intel_dp_get_su_x_granulartiy(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) +{ + u16 val; + ssize_t r; + + if (!(intel_dp->psr_dpcd[1] & DP_PSR2_SU_GRANULARITY_REQUIRED)) { + /* Returning the default X granularity */ + return 4; + } + + r = drm_dp_dpcd_read(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR2_SU_X_GRANULARITY, &val, 2); + if (r != 2) + DRM_WARN("Unable to read DP_PSR2_SU_X_GRANULARITY\n"); + + return val; +} + void intel_psr_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) { struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = @@ -315,6 +332,8 @@ void intel_psr_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) if (dev_priv->psr.sink_psr2_support) { dev_priv->psr.colorimetry_support = intel_dp_get_colorimetry_status(intel_dp); + dev_priv->psr.su_x_granularity = + intel_dp_get_su_x_granulartiy(intel_dp); } } } @@ -546,7 +565,7 @@ static bool intel_psr2_config_valid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, * at each 4 lines with height of 4 lines, what eDP states * that sink should support. */ - if (crtc_hdisplay % 4) { + if (crtc_hdisplay % dev_priv->psr.su_x_granularity) { DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 not enabled, default SU granularity not match\n"); return false; }
According to eDP spec, sink can required specific selective update granularity that source must comply. Here caching the value if required and checking if source supports it. Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)