diff mbox series

drm/virtio: fix ring free check

Message ID 20200206111416.31269-1-kraxel@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series drm/virtio: fix ring free check | expand

Commit Message

Gerd Hoffmann Feb. 6, 2020, 11:14 a.m. UTC
If the virtio device supports indirect ring descriptors we need only one
ring entry for the whole command.  Take that into account when checking
whenever the virtqueue has enough free entries for our command.

Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Chia-I Wu Feb. 6, 2020, 6:27 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 3:14 AM Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> If the virtio device supports indirect ring descriptors we need only one
> ring entry for the whole command.  Take that into account when checking
> whenever the virtqueue has enough free entries for our command.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c | 9 ++++++---
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c
> index 41e475fbd67b..a2ec09dba530 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c
> @@ -328,7 +328,8 @@ static void virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_sgs(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev,
>  {
>         struct virtqueue *vq = vgdev->ctrlq.vq;
>         bool notify = false;
> -       int ret;
> +       bool indirect;
> +       int vqcnt, ret;
>
>  again:
>         spin_lock(&vgdev->ctrlq.qlock);
> @@ -341,9 +342,11 @@ static void virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_sgs(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev,
>                 return;
>         }
>
> -       if (vq->num_free < elemcnt) {
> +       indirect = virtio_has_feature(vgdev->vdev, VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC);
> +       vqcnt = indirect ? 1 : elemcnt;
Is the feature dynamic and require the lock held?  If not, the result
can be cached and the fixup can happen before grabbing the lock

  if (vgdev->has_indirect_desc)
    elemcnt = 1;

Either way, patch is

  Reviewed-by: Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@gmail.com>


> +       if (vq->num_free < vqcnt) {
>                 spin_unlock(&vgdev->ctrlq.qlock);
> -               wait_event(vgdev->ctrlq.ack_queue, vq->num_free >= elemcnt);
> +               wait_event(vgdev->ctrlq.ack_queue, vq->num_free >= vqcnt);
>                 goto again;
>         }
>
> --
> 2.18.1
>
Gerd Hoffmann Feb. 7, 2020, 6:46 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi,

> > +       indirect = virtio_has_feature(vgdev->vdev, VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC);
> > +       vqcnt = indirect ? 1 : elemcnt;
> Is the feature dynamic and require the lock held?  If not, the result
> can be cached and the fixup can happen before grabbing the lock

Not dynamic, so yes, caching makes sense.

cheers,
  Gerd
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c
index 41e475fbd67b..a2ec09dba530 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c
@@ -328,7 +328,8 @@  static void virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_sgs(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev,
 {
 	struct virtqueue *vq = vgdev->ctrlq.vq;
 	bool notify = false;
-	int ret;
+	bool indirect;
+	int vqcnt, ret;
 
 again:
 	spin_lock(&vgdev->ctrlq.qlock);
@@ -341,9 +342,11 @@  static void virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_sgs(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev,
 		return;
 	}
 
-	if (vq->num_free < elemcnt) {
+	indirect = virtio_has_feature(vgdev->vdev, VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC);
+	vqcnt = indirect ? 1 : elemcnt;
+	if (vq->num_free < vqcnt) {
 		spin_unlock(&vgdev->ctrlq.qlock);
-		wait_event(vgdev->ctrlq.ack_queue, vq->num_free >= elemcnt);
+		wait_event(vgdev->ctrlq.ack_queue, vq->num_free >= vqcnt);
 		goto again;
 	}