Message ID | 20200924051845.397177-36-airlied@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | TTM move refactoring | expand |
Hi Am 24.09.20 um 07:18 schrieb Dave Airlie: > From: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> > > Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c | 16 ++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c > index 5d4182f5c22f..9d4100071e1d 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c > @@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ static void drm_gem_vram_kunmap_locked(struct drm_gem_vram_object *gbo) > * Permanently mapping and unmapping buffers adds overhead from > * updating the page tables and creates debugging output. Therefore, > * we delay the actual unmap operation until the BO gets evicted > - * from memory. See drm_gem_vram_bo_driver_move_notify(). > + * from memory. See drm_gem_vram_bo_driver_invalidate_notify(). > */ > } > > @@ -585,9 +585,7 @@ static void drm_gem_vram_bo_driver_evict_flags(struct drm_gem_vram_object *gbo, > *pl = gbo->placement; > } > > -static void drm_gem_vram_bo_driver_move_notify(struct drm_gem_vram_object *gbo, > - bool evict, > - struct ttm_resource *new_mem) > +static void drm_gem_vram_bo_driver_invalidate_notify(struct drm_gem_vram_object *gbo) > { > struct ttm_bo_kmap_obj *kmap = &gbo->kmap; > > @@ -605,7 +603,7 @@ static int drm_gem_vram_bo_driver_move(struct drm_gem_vram_object *gbo, > struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx, > struct ttm_resource *new_mem) > { > - drm_gem_vram_bo_driver_move_notify(gbo, evict, new_mem); > + drm_gem_vram_bo_driver_invalidate_notify(gbo); > return ttm_bo_move_memcpy(&gbo->bo, ctx, new_mem); > } I don't fully understand TTM's order of operation, so this might be a dumb question: why is invalidate_notify() called from within the move() callback? I'd expect that the invalidate_notify() callback is called by TTM before moving the BO? > > @@ -956,9 +954,7 @@ static void bo_driver_evict_flags(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, > drm_gem_vram_bo_driver_evict_flags(gbo, placement); > } > > -static void bo_driver_move_notify(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, > - bool evict, > - struct ttm_resource *new_mem) > +static void bo_driver_invalidate_notify(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo) > { > struct drm_gem_vram_object *gbo; > > @@ -968,7 +964,7 @@ static void bo_driver_move_notify(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, > > gbo = drm_gem_vram_of_bo(bo); > > - drm_gem_vram_bo_driver_move_notify(gbo, evict, new_mem); > + drm_gem_vram_bo_driver_invalidate_notify(gbo); > } > > static int bo_driver_move(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, > @@ -1008,7 +1004,7 @@ static struct ttm_bo_driver bo_driver = { > .eviction_valuable = ttm_bo_eviction_valuable, > .evict_flags = bo_driver_evict_flags, > .move = bo_driver_move, > - .move_notify = bo_driver_move_notify, > + .invalidate_notify = bo_driver_invalidate_notify, > .io_mem_reserve = bo_driver_io_mem_reserve, > }; > >
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c index 5d4182f5c22f..9d4100071e1d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c @@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ static void drm_gem_vram_kunmap_locked(struct drm_gem_vram_object *gbo) * Permanently mapping and unmapping buffers adds overhead from * updating the page tables and creates debugging output. Therefore, * we delay the actual unmap operation until the BO gets evicted - * from memory. See drm_gem_vram_bo_driver_move_notify(). + * from memory. See drm_gem_vram_bo_driver_invalidate_notify(). */ } @@ -585,9 +585,7 @@ static void drm_gem_vram_bo_driver_evict_flags(struct drm_gem_vram_object *gbo, *pl = gbo->placement; } -static void drm_gem_vram_bo_driver_move_notify(struct drm_gem_vram_object *gbo, - bool evict, - struct ttm_resource *new_mem) +static void drm_gem_vram_bo_driver_invalidate_notify(struct drm_gem_vram_object *gbo) { struct ttm_bo_kmap_obj *kmap = &gbo->kmap; @@ -605,7 +603,7 @@ static int drm_gem_vram_bo_driver_move(struct drm_gem_vram_object *gbo, struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx, struct ttm_resource *new_mem) { - drm_gem_vram_bo_driver_move_notify(gbo, evict, new_mem); + drm_gem_vram_bo_driver_invalidate_notify(gbo); return ttm_bo_move_memcpy(&gbo->bo, ctx, new_mem); } @@ -956,9 +954,7 @@ static void bo_driver_evict_flags(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, drm_gem_vram_bo_driver_evict_flags(gbo, placement); } -static void bo_driver_move_notify(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, - bool evict, - struct ttm_resource *new_mem) +static void bo_driver_invalidate_notify(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo) { struct drm_gem_vram_object *gbo; @@ -968,7 +964,7 @@ static void bo_driver_move_notify(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, gbo = drm_gem_vram_of_bo(bo); - drm_gem_vram_bo_driver_move_notify(gbo, evict, new_mem); + drm_gem_vram_bo_driver_invalidate_notify(gbo); } static int bo_driver_move(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, @@ -1008,7 +1004,7 @@ static struct ttm_bo_driver bo_driver = { .eviction_valuable = ttm_bo_eviction_valuable, .evict_flags = bo_driver_evict_flags, .move = bo_driver_move, - .move_notify = bo_driver_move_notify, + .invalidate_notify = bo_driver_invalidate_notify, .io_mem_reserve = bo_driver_io_mem_reserve, };