Message ID | 20210430223428.10514-2-lyude@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [1/2] drm/dp: Handle zeroed port counts in drm_dp_read_downstream_info() | expand |
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 06:34:28PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > Noticed this while fixing another issue in drm_dp_read_downstream_info(), > the open coded DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT check here just duplicates what we > already do in drm_dp_is_branch(), so just get rid of it. > > Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c > index 27c8c5bdf7d9..0f84df8798ab 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c > @@ -677,9 +677,7 @@ int drm_dp_read_downstream_info(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, > memset(downstream_ports, 0, DP_MAX_DOWNSTREAM_PORTS); > > /* No downstream info to read */ > - if (!drm_dp_is_branch(dpcd) || > - dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_10 || > - !(dpcd[DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT] & DP_DWN_STRM_PORT_PRESENT)) > + if (!drm_dp_is_branch(dpcd) || dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_10) BTW that DPCD_REV check looks rather wrong. Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > return 0; > > /* Some branches advertise having 0 downstream ports, despite also advertising they have a > -- > 2.30.2 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
On Mon, 2021-05-03 at 06:06 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 06:34:28PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > > Noticed this while fixing another issue in drm_dp_read_downstream_info(), > > the open coded DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT check here just duplicates what > > we > > already do in drm_dp_is_branch(), so just get rid of it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 4 +--- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c > > index 27c8c5bdf7d9..0f84df8798ab 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c > > @@ -677,9 +677,7 @@ int drm_dp_read_downstream_info(struct drm_dp_aux > > *aux, > > memset(downstream_ports, 0, DP_MAX_DOWNSTREAM_PORTS); > > > > /* No downstream info to read */ > > - if (!drm_dp_is_branch(dpcd) || > > - dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_10 || > > - !(dpcd[DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT] & DP_DWN_STRM_PORT_PRESENT)) > > + if (!drm_dp_is_branch(dpcd) || dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_10) > > BTW that DPCD_REV check looks rather wrong. > > Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> I'll send out a separate fix for this in just a moment, thanks for pointing it out! > > > return 0; > > > > /* Some branches advertise having 0 downstream ports, despite also > > advertising they have a > > -- > > 2.30.2 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Intel-gfx mailing list > > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx >
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c index 27c8c5bdf7d9..0f84df8798ab 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c @@ -677,9 +677,7 @@ int drm_dp_read_downstream_info(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, memset(downstream_ports, 0, DP_MAX_DOWNSTREAM_PORTS); /* No downstream info to read */ - if (!drm_dp_is_branch(dpcd) || - dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_10 || - !(dpcd[DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT] & DP_DWN_STRM_PORT_PRESENT)) + if (!drm_dp_is_branch(dpcd) || dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_10) return 0; /* Some branches advertise having 0 downstream ports, despite also advertising they have a
Noticed this while fixing another issue in drm_dp_read_downstream_info(), the open coded DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT check here just duplicates what we already do in drm_dp_is_branch(), so just get rid of it. Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)