diff mbox series

drm/dp_mst: Add missing drm parameters to recently added call to drm_dbg_kms()

Message ID 20210616194415.36926-1-jose.souza@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series drm/dp_mst: Add missing drm parameters to recently added call to drm_dbg_kms() | expand

Commit Message

Souza, Jose June 16, 2021, 7:44 p.m. UTC
Commit 3769e4c0af5b ("drm/dp_mst: Avoid to mess up payload table by
ports in stale topology") added to calls to drm_dbg_kms() but it
missed the first parameter, the drm device breaking the build.

Fixes: 3769e4c0af5b ("drm/dp_mst: Avoid to mess up payload table by ports in stale topology")
Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Lyude Paul June 16, 2021, 7:47 p.m. UTC | #1
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>

Will go ahead and push this to drm-misc-next-fixes, thanks

On Wed, 2021-06-16 at 12:44 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> Commit 3769e4c0af5b ("drm/dp_mst: Avoid to mess up payload table by
> ports in stale topology") added to calls to drm_dbg_kms() but it
> missed the first parameter, the drm device breaking the build.
> 
> Fixes: 3769e4c0af5b ("drm/dp_mst: Avoid to mess up payload table by ports in
> stale topology")
> Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
> Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 7 +++++--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> index 9ac148efd9e43..ad0795afc21cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> @@ -3389,7 +3389,9 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct
> drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
>                         mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
>  
>                         if (skip) {
> -                               drm_dbg_kms("Virtual channel %d is not in
> current topology\n", i);
> +                               drm_dbg_kms(mgr->dev,
> +                                           "Virtual channel %d is not in
> current topology\n",
> +                                           i);
>                                 continue;
>                         }
>                         /* Validated ports don't matter if we're releasing
> @@ -3404,7 +3406,8 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct
> drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
>                                                 payload->start_slot =
> req_payload.start_slot;
>                                                 continue;
>                                         } else {
> -                                               drm_dbg_kms("Fail:set
> payload to invalid sink");
> +                                               drm_dbg_kms(mgr->dev,
> +                                                           "Fail:set
> payload to invalid sink");
>                                                 mutex_unlock(&mgr-
> >payload_lock);
>                                                 return -EINVAL;
>                                         }
Lin, Wayne June 17, 2021, 8:20 a.m. UTC | #2
[Public]

Really sorry for the mistake that I made and any inconvenience it brought.
Thanks José and Lyude.

Regards,
Wayne
Lyude Paul June 18, 2021, 3:54 p.m. UTC | #3
It's no problem! We all make mistakes sometimes :), I should have been more
diligent on compile-checking this myself as well

On Thu, 2021-06-17 at 08:20 +0000, Lin, Wayne wrote:
> [Public]
> 
> Really sorry for the mistake that I made and any inconvenience it brought.
> Thanks José and Lyude.
> 
> Regards,
> Wayne
> 
> ________________________________________
> > From: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2021 03:47
> > To: José Roberto de Souza; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; Lin, Wayne
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/dp_mst: Add missing drm parameters to recently
> > added call to drm_dbg_kms()
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> > 
> > Will go ahead and push this to drm-misc-next-fixes, thanks
> > 
> > On Wed, 2021-06-16 at 12:44 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> > > Commit 3769e4c0af5b ("drm/dp_mst: Avoid to mess up payload table by
> > > ports in stale topology") added to calls to drm_dbg_kms() but it
> > > missed the first parameter, the drm device breaking the build.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 3769e4c0af5b ("drm/dp_mst: Avoid to mess up payload table by
> > > ports in
> > > stale topology")
> > > Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
> > > Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> > > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 7 +++++--
> > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > > index 9ac148efd9e43..ad0795afc21cf 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > > @@ -3389,7 +3389,9 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct
> > > drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
> > >                         mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
> > > 
> > >                         if (skip) {
> > > -                               drm_dbg_kms("Virtual channel %d is not
> > > in
> > > current topology\n", i);
> > > +                               drm_dbg_kms(mgr->dev,
> > > +                                           "Virtual channel %d is not
> > > in
> > > current topology\n",
> > > +                                           i);
> > >                                 continue;
> > >                         }
> > >                         /* Validated ports don't matter if we're
> > > releasing
> > > @@ -3404,7 +3406,8 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct
> > > drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
> > >                                                 payload->start_slot =
> > > req_payload.start_slot;
> > >                                                 continue;
> > >                                         } else {
> > > -                                               drm_dbg_kms("Fail:set
> > > payload to invalid sink");
> > > +                                               drm_dbg_kms(mgr->dev,
> > > +                                                           "Fail:set
> > > payload to invalid sink");
> > >                                                 mutex_unlock(&mgr-
> > > > payload_lock);
> > >                                                 return -EINVAL;
> > >                                         }
> > 
> > --
> > Cheers,
> >  Lyude Paul (she/her)
> >  Software Engineer at Red Hat
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
index 9ac148efd9e43..ad0795afc21cf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
@@ -3389,7 +3389,9 @@  int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
 			mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
 
 			if (skip) {
-				drm_dbg_kms("Virtual channel %d is not in current topology\n", i);
+				drm_dbg_kms(mgr->dev,
+					    "Virtual channel %d is not in current topology\n",
+					    i);
 				continue;
 			}
 			/* Validated ports don't matter if we're releasing
@@ -3404,7 +3406,8 @@  int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
 						payload->start_slot = req_payload.start_slot;
 						continue;
 					} else {
-						drm_dbg_kms("Fail:set payload to invalid sink");
+						drm_dbg_kms(mgr->dev,
+							    "Fail:set payload to invalid sink");
 						mutex_unlock(&mgr->payload_lock);
 						return -EINVAL;
 					}