diff mbox series

[v1] fix vmwgfx compilation error due to a missing include

Message ID 20210709180944.2533114-1-ztong0001@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [v1] fix vmwgfx compilation error due to a missing include | expand

Commit Message

Tong Zhang July 9, 2021, 6:09 p.m. UTC
This patch fixes vmwgfx driver compilation error due to a missing include

drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c: In function ‘vmw_vram_manager_init’:
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c:678:8: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ttm_range_man_init’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  678 |  ret = ttm_range_man_init(&dev_priv->bdev, TTM_PL_VRAM, false,
      |        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c: In function ‘vmw_vram_manager_fini’:
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c:690:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ttm_range_man_fini’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  690 |  ttm_range_man_fini(&dev_priv->bdev, TTM_PL_VRAM);
      |  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

Signed-off-by: Tong Zhang <ztong0001@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Comments

Randy Dunlap July 9, 2021, 7:57 p.m. UTC | #1
On 7/9/21 11:09 AM, Tong Zhang wrote:
> This patch fixes vmwgfx driver compilation error due to a missing include
> 
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c: In function ‘vmw_vram_manager_init’:
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c:678:8: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ttm_range_man_init’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   678 |  ret = ttm_range_man_init(&dev_priv->bdev, TTM_PL_VRAM, false,
>       |        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c: In function ‘vmw_vram_manager_fini’:
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c:690:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ttm_range_man_fini’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   690 |  ttm_range_man_fini(&dev_priv->bdev, TTM_PL_VRAM);
>       |  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tong Zhang <ztong0001@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c
> index 6f5ea00973e0..6eb93aa2f311 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
>  #include <drm/drm_sysfs.h>
>  #include <drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h>
>  #include <drm/ttm/ttm_placement.h>
> +#include <drm/ttm/ttm_range_manager.h>
>  #include <generated/utsrelease.h>
>  
>  #include "ttm_object.h"
> 

Yes, it's time to get one of these (3 or more) such patches
merged so that linux-next does not continue to have build errors,
like it has for about the last 2 weeks.

thanks.
Dave Airlie July 9, 2021, 8:04 p.m. UTC | #2
cc'ing Christian to fix this I assume it was ttm refactor?

>
> This patch fixes vmwgfx driver compilation error due to a missing include
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c: In function ‘vmw_vram_manager_init’:
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c:678:8: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ttm_range_man_init’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   678 |  ret = ttm_range_man_init(&dev_priv->bdev, TTM_PL_VRAM, false,
>       |        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c: In function ‘vmw_vram_manager_fini’:
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c:690:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ttm_range_man_fini’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   690 |  ttm_range_man_fini(&dev_priv->bdev, TTM_PL_VRAM);
>       |  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>
> Signed-off-by: Tong Zhang <ztong0001@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c
> index 6f5ea00973e0..6eb93aa2f311 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
>  #include <drm/drm_sysfs.h>
>  #include <drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h>
>  #include <drm/ttm/ttm_placement.h>
> +#include <drm/ttm/ttm_range_manager.h>
>  #include <generated/utsrelease.h>
>
>  #include "ttm_object.h"
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Zack Rusin July 9, 2021, 8:34 p.m. UTC | #3
On 7/9/21 4:04 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> cc'ing Christian to fix this I assume it was ttm refactor?

Yes, but it's on me because after fixing it I kept forgetting to queue it up for a merge. It's now in drm-misc/drm-misc-next-fixes.

Thomas, if you could make sure your next drm-misc-next-fixes pull request includes c26d6586e97a ("drm/vmwgfx: Fix implicit declaration error") that'd be great.

z
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c
index 6f5ea00973e0..6eb93aa2f311 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ 
 #include <drm/drm_sysfs.h>
 #include <drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h>
 #include <drm/ttm/ttm_placement.h>
+#include <drm/ttm/ttm_range_manager.h>
 #include <generated/utsrelease.h>
 
 #include "ttm_object.h"