diff mbox series

[v2,2/3] drm/bridge: parade-ps8640: Move real poweroff action to new function

Message ID 20211102093618.114928-2-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [v2,1/3] drm/bridge: parade-ps8640: Don't try to enable VDO if poweron fails | expand

Commit Message

AngeloGioacchino Del Regno Nov. 2, 2021, 9:36 a.m. UTC
In preparation for varying the poweron error handling in function
ps8640_bridge_poweron(), move function ps8640_bridge_poweroff() up
and also move the actual logic to power off the chip to a new
__ps8640_bridge_poweroff() function.

Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c | 37 ++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

Comments

Dafna Hirschfeld Nov. 10, 2021, 12:44 p.m. UTC | #1
On 02.11.21 11:36, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> In preparation for varying the poweron error handling in function
> ps8640_bridge_poweron(), move function ps8640_bridge_poweroff() up
> and also move the actual logic to power off the chip to a new
> __ps8640_bridge_poweroff() function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c | 37 ++++++++++++++------------
>   1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c
> index 8c5402947b3c..41f5d511d516 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c
> @@ -293,6 +293,26 @@ static int ps8640_bridge_vdo_control(struct ps8640 *ps_bridge,
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +static void __ps8640_bridge_poweroff(struct ps8640 *ps_bridge)
> +{
> +	gpiod_set_value(ps_bridge->gpio_reset, 1);
> +	gpiod_set_value(ps_bridge->gpio_powerdown, 1);
> +	if (regulator_bulk_disable(ARRAY_SIZE(ps_bridge->supplies),
> +				   ps_bridge->supplies)) {
> +		DRM_ERROR("cannot disable regulators\n");
> +	}

That '{' is redundant

Thanks,
Danfa

> +}
> +
> +static void ps8640_bridge_poweroff(struct ps8640 *ps_bridge)
> +{
> +	if (!ps_bridge->powered)
> +		return;
> +
> +	__ps8640_bridge_poweroff(ps_bridge);
> +
> +	ps_bridge->powered = false;
> +}
> +
>   static int ps8640_bridge_poweron(struct ps8640 *ps_bridge)
>   {
>   	struct regmap *map = ps_bridge->regmap[PAGE2_TOP_CNTL];
> @@ -361,23 +381,6 @@ static int ps8640_bridge_poweron(struct ps8640 *ps_bridge)
>   	return ret;
>   }
>   
> -static void ps8640_bridge_poweroff(struct ps8640 *ps_bridge)
> -{
> -	int ret;
> -
> -	if (!ps_bridge->powered)
> -		return;
> -
> -	gpiod_set_value(ps_bridge->gpio_reset, 1);
> -	gpiod_set_value(ps_bridge->gpio_powerdown, 1);
> -	ret = regulator_bulk_disable(ARRAY_SIZE(ps_bridge->supplies),
> -				     ps_bridge->supplies);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> -		DRM_ERROR("cannot disable regulators %d\n", ret);
> -
> -	ps_bridge->powered = false;
> -}
> -
>   static void ps8640_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
>   {
>   	struct ps8640 *ps_bridge = bridge_to_ps8640(bridge);
>
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno Nov. 10, 2021, 12:46 p.m. UTC | #2
Il 10/11/21 13:44, Dafna Hirschfeld ha scritto:
> 
> 
> On 02.11.21 11:36, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>> In preparation for varying the poweron error handling in function
>> ps8640_bridge_poweron(), move function ps8640_bridge_poweroff() up
>> and also move the actual logic to power off the chip to a new
>> __ps8640_bridge_poweroff() function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c | 37 ++++++++++++++------------
>>   1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c
>> index 8c5402947b3c..41f5d511d516 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c
>> @@ -293,6 +293,26 @@ static int ps8640_bridge_vdo_control(struct ps8640 *ps_bridge,
>>       return 0;
>>   }
>> +static void __ps8640_bridge_poweroff(struct ps8640 *ps_bridge)
>> +{
>> +    gpiod_set_value(ps_bridge->gpio_reset, 1);
>> +    gpiod_set_value(ps_bridge->gpio_powerdown, 1);
>> +    if (regulator_bulk_disable(ARRAY_SIZE(ps_bridge->supplies),
>> +                   ps_bridge->supplies)) {
>> +        DRM_ERROR("cannot disable regulators\n");
>> +    }
> 
> That '{' is redundant
> 
> Thanks,
> Danfa
> 

Hi Dafna,
the braces were added as a way to increase human readability.

Cheers,
- Angelo
Robert Foss Nov. 19, 2021, 1:19 p.m. UTC | #3
Hey Angelo,

On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 at 13:46, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> wrote:
>
> Il 10/11/21 13:44, Dafna Hirschfeld ha scritto:
> >
> >
> > On 02.11.21 11:36, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> >> In preparation for varying the poweron error handling in function
> >> ps8640_bridge_poweron(), move function ps8640_bridge_poweroff() up
> >> and also move the actual logic to power off the chip to a new
> >> __ps8640_bridge_poweroff() function.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c | 37 ++++++++++++++------------
> >>   1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c
> >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c
> >> index 8c5402947b3c..41f5d511d516 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c
> >> @@ -293,6 +293,26 @@ static int ps8640_bridge_vdo_control(struct ps8640 *ps_bridge,
> >>       return 0;
> >>   }
> >> +static void __ps8640_bridge_poweroff(struct ps8640 *ps_bridge)
> >> +{
> >> +    gpiod_set_value(ps_bridge->gpio_reset, 1);
> >> +    gpiod_set_value(ps_bridge->gpio_powerdown, 1);
> >> +    if (regulator_bulk_disable(ARRAY_SIZE(ps_bridge->supplies),
> >> +                   ps_bridge->supplies)) {
> >> +        DRM_ERROR("cannot disable regulators\n");
> >> +    }
> >
> > That '{' is redundant
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Danfa
> >
>
> Hi Dafna,
> the braces were added as a way to increase human readability.

Not to bikeshed this, but the kernel style guide is clear about this.
No unneeded braces should be used where a single statement will do.
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno Nov. 19, 2021, 3:08 p.m. UTC | #4
Il 19/11/21 14:19, Robert Foss ha scritto:
> Hey Angelo,
> 
> On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 at 13:46, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
> <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> wrote:
>>
>> Il 10/11/21 13:44, Dafna Hirschfeld ha scritto:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 02.11.21 11:36, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>>>> In preparation for varying the poweron error handling in function
>>>> ps8640_bridge_poweron(), move function ps8640_bridge_poweroff() up
>>>> and also move the actual logic to power off the chip to a new
>>>> __ps8640_bridge_poweroff() function.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c | 37 ++++++++++++++------------
>>>>    1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c
>>>> index 8c5402947b3c..41f5d511d516 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c
>>>> @@ -293,6 +293,26 @@ static int ps8640_bridge_vdo_control(struct ps8640 *ps_bridge,
>>>>        return 0;
>>>>    }
>>>> +static void __ps8640_bridge_poweroff(struct ps8640 *ps_bridge)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    gpiod_set_value(ps_bridge->gpio_reset, 1);
>>>> +    gpiod_set_value(ps_bridge->gpio_powerdown, 1);
>>>> +    if (regulator_bulk_disable(ARRAY_SIZE(ps_bridge->supplies),
>>>> +                   ps_bridge->supplies)) {
>>>> +        DRM_ERROR("cannot disable regulators\n");
>>>> +    }
>>>
>>> That '{' is redundant
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Danfa
>>>
>>
>> Hi Dafna,
>> the braces were added as a way to increase human readability.
> 
> Not to bikeshed this, but the kernel style guide is clear about this.
> No unneeded braces should be used where a single statement will do.
> 

Hey Robert!

That's right, style rules come before personal preferences.
I'll send a v3 without the braces as soon as possible!

Cheers,
- Angelo
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c
index 8c5402947b3c..41f5d511d516 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c
@@ -293,6 +293,26 @@  static int ps8640_bridge_vdo_control(struct ps8640 *ps_bridge,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void __ps8640_bridge_poweroff(struct ps8640 *ps_bridge)
+{
+	gpiod_set_value(ps_bridge->gpio_reset, 1);
+	gpiod_set_value(ps_bridge->gpio_powerdown, 1);
+	if (regulator_bulk_disable(ARRAY_SIZE(ps_bridge->supplies),
+				   ps_bridge->supplies)) {
+		DRM_ERROR("cannot disable regulators\n");
+	}
+}
+
+static void ps8640_bridge_poweroff(struct ps8640 *ps_bridge)
+{
+	if (!ps_bridge->powered)
+		return;
+
+	__ps8640_bridge_poweroff(ps_bridge);
+
+	ps_bridge->powered = false;
+}
+
 static int ps8640_bridge_poweron(struct ps8640 *ps_bridge)
 {
 	struct regmap *map = ps_bridge->regmap[PAGE2_TOP_CNTL];
@@ -361,23 +381,6 @@  static int ps8640_bridge_poweron(struct ps8640 *ps_bridge)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static void ps8640_bridge_poweroff(struct ps8640 *ps_bridge)
-{
-	int ret;
-
-	if (!ps_bridge->powered)
-		return;
-
-	gpiod_set_value(ps_bridge->gpio_reset, 1);
-	gpiod_set_value(ps_bridge->gpio_powerdown, 1);
-	ret = regulator_bulk_disable(ARRAY_SIZE(ps_bridge->supplies),
-				     ps_bridge->supplies);
-	if (ret < 0)
-		DRM_ERROR("cannot disable regulators %d\n", ret);
-
-	ps_bridge->powered = false;
-}
-
 static void ps8640_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
 {
 	struct ps8640 *ps_bridge = bridge_to_ps8640(bridge);