| Message ID | 20211130162513.2898302-2-kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | drm: rcar-du: mipi-dsi: Cleanup and Fixes | expand |
Hi Kieran, Thank you for the patch. On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 04:25:12PM +0000, Kieran Bingham wrote: > The bridge probe ordering for DSI devices has been clarified and further > documented in I've read the document and :-) > To support connecting with the SN65DSI86 device after commit c3b75d4734cb > ("drm/bridge: sn65dsi86: Register and attach our DSI device at probe"), > update to the new probe ordering to remove a perpetual -EPROBE_DEFER > loop between the two devices. > > Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com> > > --- > v2 > - Remove now unused panel variable from rcar_mipi_dsi_probe() > > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_mipi_dsi.c | 49 +++++++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_mipi_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_mipi_dsi.c > index 50e922328fed..0a9f197ef62c 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_mipi_dsi.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_mipi_dsi.c > @@ -637,6 +637,8 @@ static int rcar_mipi_dsi_host_attach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host, > struct mipi_dsi_device *device) > { > struct rcar_mipi_dsi *dsi = host_to_rcar_mipi_dsi(host); > + struct drm_panel *panel; > + int ret; > > if (device->lanes > dsi->num_data_lanes) > return -EINVAL; > @@ -644,12 +646,36 @@ static int rcar_mipi_dsi_host_attach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host, > dsi->lanes = device->lanes; > dsi->format = device->format; > > + ret = drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(dsi->dev->of_node, 1, 0, &panel, > + &dsi->next_bridge); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err_probe(dsi->dev, ret, "could not find next bridge\n"); dev_err_probe() should only be used in probe(), and this function isn't guaranteed to be called at probe time only. This isn't a big deal as the next patch fixes this, and both will be squashed. Furthermore, rcar_mipi_dsi_host_attach() should only be called when the DSI device gets registered, which should happen after it registers its bridge, so I don't think we can see a probe deferral here. Other than that the patch looks fine, I'll squash it with the DSI driver. > + return ret; > + } > + > + if (!dsi->next_bridge) { > + dsi->next_bridge = devm_drm_panel_bridge_add(dsi->dev, panel); > + if (IS_ERR(dsi->next_bridge)) { > + dev_err(dsi->dev, "failed to create panel bridge\n"); > + return PTR_ERR(dsi->next_bridge); > + } > + } > + > + /* Initialize the DRM bridge. */ > + dsi->bridge.funcs = &rcar_mipi_dsi_bridge_ops; > + dsi->bridge.of_node = dsi->dev->of_node; > + drm_bridge_add(&dsi->bridge); > + > return 0; > } > > static int rcar_mipi_dsi_host_detach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host, > struct mipi_dsi_device *device) > { > + struct rcar_mipi_dsi *dsi = host_to_rcar_mipi_dsi(host); > + > + drm_bridge_remove(&dsi->bridge); > + > return 0; > } > > @@ -731,7 +757,6 @@ static int rcar_mipi_dsi_get_clocks(struct rcar_mipi_dsi *dsi) > static int rcar_mipi_dsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > struct rcar_mipi_dsi *dsi; > - struct drm_panel *panel; > struct resource *mem; > int ret; > > @@ -764,21 +789,6 @@ static int rcar_mipi_dsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return PTR_ERR(dsi->rstc); > } > > - ret = drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(dsi->dev->of_node, 1, 0, &panel, > - &dsi->next_bridge); > - if (ret) { > - dev_err_probe(dsi->dev, ret, "could not find next bridge\n"); > - return ret; > - } > - > - if (!dsi->next_bridge) { > - dsi->next_bridge = devm_drm_panel_bridge_add(dsi->dev, panel); > - if (IS_ERR(dsi->next_bridge)) { > - dev_err(dsi->dev, "failed to create panel bridge\n"); > - return PTR_ERR(dsi->next_bridge); > - } > - } > - > /* Initialize the DSI host. */ > dsi->host.dev = dsi->dev; > dsi->host.ops = &rcar_mipi_dsi_host_ops; > @@ -786,11 +796,6 @@ static int rcar_mipi_dsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (ret < 0) > return ret; > > - /* Initialize the DRM bridge. */ > - dsi->bridge.funcs = &rcar_mipi_dsi_bridge_ops; > - dsi->bridge.of_node = dsi->dev->of_node; > - drm_bridge_add(&dsi->bridge); > - > return 0; > } > > @@ -798,8 +803,6 @@ static int rcar_mipi_dsi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > struct rcar_mipi_dsi *dsi = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > > - drm_bridge_remove(&dsi->bridge); > - > mipi_dsi_host_unregister(&dsi->host); > > return 0;
Quoting Laurent Pinchart (2021-12-01 04:38:46) > Hi Kieran, > > Thank you for the patch. > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 04:25:12PM +0000, Kieran Bingham wrote: > > The bridge probe ordering for DSI devices has been clarified and further > > documented in > > I've read the document and > Good, I'm glad you've fully got the > > :-) Sorry, not sure how I missed that, I must have failed to paste in the link to the DSI probe documentation. But as you've read that, and now this is squashed, I think this is done anyway. Thanks for handling the integrations. -- Kieran > > > To support connecting with the SN65DSI86 device after commit c3b75d4734cb > > ("drm/bridge: sn65dsi86: Register and attach our DSI device at probe"), > > update to the new probe ordering to remove a perpetual -EPROBE_DEFER > > loop between the two devices. > > > > Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com> > > > > --- > > v2 > > - Remove now unused panel variable from rcar_mipi_dsi_probe() > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_mipi_dsi.c | 49 +++++++++++++------------ > > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_mipi_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_mipi_dsi.c > > index 50e922328fed..0a9f197ef62c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_mipi_dsi.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_mipi_dsi.c > > @@ -637,6 +637,8 @@ static int rcar_mipi_dsi_host_attach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host, > > struct mipi_dsi_device *device) > > { > > struct rcar_mipi_dsi *dsi = host_to_rcar_mipi_dsi(host); > > + struct drm_panel *panel; > > + int ret; > > > > if (device->lanes > dsi->num_data_lanes) > > return -EINVAL; > > @@ -644,12 +646,36 @@ static int rcar_mipi_dsi_host_attach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host, > > dsi->lanes = device->lanes; > > dsi->format = device->format; > > > > + ret = drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(dsi->dev->of_node, 1, 0, &panel, > > + &dsi->next_bridge); > > + if (ret) { > > + dev_err_probe(dsi->dev, ret, "could not find next bridge\n"); > > dev_err_probe() should only be used in probe(), and this function isn't > guaranteed to be called at probe time only. > > This isn't a big deal as the next patch fixes this, and both will be > squashed. Furthermore, rcar_mipi_dsi_host_attach() should only be called > when the DSI device gets registered, which should happen after it > registers its bridge, so I don't think we can see a probe deferral here. > > Other than that the patch looks fine, I'll squash it with the DSI > driver. > > > + return ret; > > + } > > + > > + if (!dsi->next_bridge) { > > + dsi->next_bridge = devm_drm_panel_bridge_add(dsi->dev, panel); > > + if (IS_ERR(dsi->next_bridge)) { > > + dev_err(dsi->dev, "failed to create panel bridge\n"); > > + return PTR_ERR(dsi->next_bridge); > > + } > > + } > > + > > + /* Initialize the DRM bridge. */ > > + dsi->bridge.funcs = &rcar_mipi_dsi_bridge_ops; > > + dsi->bridge.of_node = dsi->dev->of_node; > > + drm_bridge_add(&dsi->bridge); > > + > > return 0; > > } > > > > static int rcar_mipi_dsi_host_detach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host, > > struct mipi_dsi_device *device) > > { > > + struct rcar_mipi_dsi *dsi = host_to_rcar_mipi_dsi(host); > > + > > + drm_bridge_remove(&dsi->bridge); > > + > > return 0; > > } > > > > @@ -731,7 +757,6 @@ static int rcar_mipi_dsi_get_clocks(struct rcar_mipi_dsi *dsi) > > static int rcar_mipi_dsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > { > > struct rcar_mipi_dsi *dsi; > > - struct drm_panel *panel; > > struct resource *mem; > > int ret; > > > > @@ -764,21 +789,6 @@ static int rcar_mipi_dsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > return PTR_ERR(dsi->rstc); > > } > > > > - ret = drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(dsi->dev->of_node, 1, 0, &panel, > > - &dsi->next_bridge); > > - if (ret) { > > - dev_err_probe(dsi->dev, ret, "could not find next bridge\n"); > > - return ret; > > - } > > - > > - if (!dsi->next_bridge) { > > - dsi->next_bridge = devm_drm_panel_bridge_add(dsi->dev, panel); > > - if (IS_ERR(dsi->next_bridge)) { > > - dev_err(dsi->dev, "failed to create panel bridge\n"); > > - return PTR_ERR(dsi->next_bridge); > > - } > > - } > > - > > /* Initialize the DSI host. */ > > dsi->host.dev = dsi->dev; > > dsi->host.ops = &rcar_mipi_dsi_host_ops; > > @@ -786,11 +796,6 @@ static int rcar_mipi_dsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > if (ret < 0) > > return ret; > > > > - /* Initialize the DRM bridge. */ > > - dsi->bridge.funcs = &rcar_mipi_dsi_bridge_ops; > > - dsi->bridge.of_node = dsi->dev->of_node; > > - drm_bridge_add(&dsi->bridge); > > - > > return 0; > > } > > > > @@ -798,8 +803,6 @@ static int rcar_mipi_dsi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > > { > > struct rcar_mipi_dsi *dsi = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > > > > - drm_bridge_remove(&dsi->bridge); > > - > > mipi_dsi_host_unregister(&dsi->host); > > > > return 0; > > -- > Regards, > > Laurent Pinchart
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_mipi_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_mipi_dsi.c index 50e922328fed..0a9f197ef62c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_mipi_dsi.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_mipi_dsi.c @@ -637,6 +637,8 @@ static int rcar_mipi_dsi_host_attach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host, struct mipi_dsi_device *device) { struct rcar_mipi_dsi *dsi = host_to_rcar_mipi_dsi(host); + struct drm_panel *panel; + int ret; if (device->lanes > dsi->num_data_lanes) return -EINVAL; @@ -644,12 +646,36 @@ static int rcar_mipi_dsi_host_attach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host, dsi->lanes = device->lanes; dsi->format = device->format; + ret = drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(dsi->dev->of_node, 1, 0, &panel, + &dsi->next_bridge); + if (ret) { + dev_err_probe(dsi->dev, ret, "could not find next bridge\n"); + return ret; + } + + if (!dsi->next_bridge) { + dsi->next_bridge = devm_drm_panel_bridge_add(dsi->dev, panel); + if (IS_ERR(dsi->next_bridge)) { + dev_err(dsi->dev, "failed to create panel bridge\n"); + return PTR_ERR(dsi->next_bridge); + } + } + + /* Initialize the DRM bridge. */ + dsi->bridge.funcs = &rcar_mipi_dsi_bridge_ops; + dsi->bridge.of_node = dsi->dev->of_node; + drm_bridge_add(&dsi->bridge); + return 0; } static int rcar_mipi_dsi_host_detach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host, struct mipi_dsi_device *device) { + struct rcar_mipi_dsi *dsi = host_to_rcar_mipi_dsi(host); + + drm_bridge_remove(&dsi->bridge); + return 0; } @@ -731,7 +757,6 @@ static int rcar_mipi_dsi_get_clocks(struct rcar_mipi_dsi *dsi) static int rcar_mipi_dsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct rcar_mipi_dsi *dsi; - struct drm_panel *panel; struct resource *mem; int ret; @@ -764,21 +789,6 @@ static int rcar_mipi_dsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return PTR_ERR(dsi->rstc); } - ret = drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(dsi->dev->of_node, 1, 0, &panel, - &dsi->next_bridge); - if (ret) { - dev_err_probe(dsi->dev, ret, "could not find next bridge\n"); - return ret; - } - - if (!dsi->next_bridge) { - dsi->next_bridge = devm_drm_panel_bridge_add(dsi->dev, panel); - if (IS_ERR(dsi->next_bridge)) { - dev_err(dsi->dev, "failed to create panel bridge\n"); - return PTR_ERR(dsi->next_bridge); - } - } - /* Initialize the DSI host. */ dsi->host.dev = dsi->dev; dsi->host.ops = &rcar_mipi_dsi_host_ops; @@ -786,11 +796,6 @@ static int rcar_mipi_dsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (ret < 0) return ret; - /* Initialize the DRM bridge. */ - dsi->bridge.funcs = &rcar_mipi_dsi_bridge_ops; - dsi->bridge.of_node = dsi->dev->of_node; - drm_bridge_add(&dsi->bridge); - return 0; } @@ -798,8 +803,6 @@ static int rcar_mipi_dsi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct rcar_mipi_dsi *dsi = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); - drm_bridge_remove(&dsi->bridge); - mipi_dsi_host_unregister(&dsi->host); return 0;
The bridge probe ordering for DSI devices has been clarified and further documented in To support connecting with the SN65DSI86 device after commit c3b75d4734cb ("drm/bridge: sn65dsi86: Register and attach our DSI device at probe"), update to the new probe ordering to remove a perpetual -EPROBE_DEFER loop between the two devices. Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com> --- v2 - Remove now unused panel variable from rcar_mipi_dsi_probe() drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_mipi_dsi.c | 49 +++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)