Message ID | 20220629184343.3438856-14-mail@conchuod.ie (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Canaan devicetree fixes | expand |
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 07:43:42PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> > > The k210 devicetrees warn about missing/empty reg and/or ranges > properties: > arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k210.dtsi:408.22-460.5: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /soc/bus@52000000: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property > arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k210.dtsi:352.22-406.5: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/bus@50400000: missing or empty reg/ranges property > > Add reg and ranges properties that naively cap the buses after the > allocation of their last devices. > > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> > --- > arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k210.dtsi | 9 ++++++--- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k210.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k210.dtsi > index 948dc235e39d..6a34dc4f3e51 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k210.dtsi > +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k210.dtsi > @@ -163,7 +163,8 @@ apb0: bus@50200000 { > #address-cells = <1>; > #size-cells = <1>; > compatible = "simple-pm-bus"; > - ranges; > + regs = <0x50200000 0x200000>; > + ranges = <0x50200000 0x50200000 0x200000>; This looks wrong. The property is called "reg" not "regs". And I don't think that you should provide "reg" at all, simply supplying "ranges" should be sufficient, no? Kind regards, Niklas > clocks = <&sysclk K210_CLK_APB0>; > > gpio1: gpio@50200000 { > @@ -382,7 +383,8 @@ apb1: bus@50400000 { > #address-cells = <1>; > #size-cells = <1>; > compatible = "simple-pm-bus"; > - ranges; > + regs = <0x50400000 0x40100>; > + ranges = <0x50400000 0x50400000 0x40100>; > clocks = <&sysclk K210_CLK_APB1>; > > wdt0: watchdog@50400000 { > @@ -437,7 +439,8 @@ apb2: bus@52000000 { > #address-cells = <1>; > #size-cells = <1>; > compatible = "simple-pm-bus"; > - ranges; > + regs = <0x52000000 0x2000200>; > + ranges = <0x52000000 0x52000000 0x2000200>; > clocks = <&sysclk K210_CLK_APB2>; > > spi0: spi@52000000 { > -- > 2.36.1 >
On 30/06/2022 17:49, Niklas Cassel wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 07:43:42PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: >> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> >> >> The k210 devicetrees warn about missing/empty reg and/or ranges >> properties: >> arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k210.dtsi:408.22-460.5: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /soc/bus@52000000: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property >> arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k210.dtsi:352.22-406.5: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/bus@50400000: missing or empty reg/ranges property >> >> Add reg and ranges properties that naively cap the buses after the >> allocation of their last devices. >> >> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> >> --- >> arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k210.dtsi | 9 ++++++--- >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k210.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k210.dtsi >> index 948dc235e39d..6a34dc4f3e51 100644 >> --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k210.dtsi >> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k210.dtsi >> @@ -163,7 +163,8 @@ apb0: bus@50200000 { >> #address-cells = <1>; >> #size-cells = <1>; >> compatible = "simple-pm-bus"; >> - ranges; >> + regs = <0x50200000 0x200000>; >> + ranges = <0x50200000 0x50200000 0x200000>; > > This looks wrong. > > The property is called "reg" not "regs". Yeah... > > And I don't think that you should provide "reg" at all, > simply supplying "ranges" should be sufficient, no? I don't recall why I put the regs in, I'll drop it if possible & respond if I can't. IIRC, it did actually complain. > > > Kind regards, > Niklas > >> clocks = <&sysclk K210_CLK_APB0>; >> >> gpio1: gpio@50200000 { >> @@ -382,7 +383,8 @@ apb1: bus@50400000 { >> #address-cells = <1>; >> #size-cells = <1>; >> compatible = "simple-pm-bus"; >> - ranges; >> + regs = <0x50400000 0x40100>; >> + ranges = <0x50400000 0x50400000 0x40100>; >> clocks = <&sysclk K210_CLK_APB1>; >> >> wdt0: watchdog@50400000 { >> @@ -437,7 +439,8 @@ apb2: bus@52000000 { >> #address-cells = <1>; >> #size-cells = <1>; >> compatible = "simple-pm-bus"; >> - ranges; >> + regs = <0x52000000 0x2000200>; >> + ranges = <0x52000000 0x52000000 0x2000200>; >> clocks = <&sysclk K210_CLK_APB2>; >> >> spi0: spi@52000000 { >> -- >> 2.36.1
On 30/06/2022 18:02, Conor Dooley wrote: > > > On 30/06/2022 17:49, Niklas Cassel wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 07:43:42PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: >>> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> >>> >>> The k210 devicetrees warn about missing/empty reg and/or ranges >>> properties: >>> arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k210.dtsi:408.22-460.5: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /soc/bus@52000000: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property >>> arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k210.dtsi:352.22-406.5: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/bus@50400000: missing or empty reg/ranges property >>> >>> Add reg and ranges properties that naively cap the buses after the >>> allocation of their last devices. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> >>> --- >>> arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k210.dtsi | 9 ++++++--- >>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k210.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k210.dtsi >>> index 948dc235e39d..6a34dc4f3e51 100644 >>> --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k210.dtsi >>> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k210.dtsi >>> @@ -163,7 +163,8 @@ apb0: bus@50200000 { >>> #address-cells = <1>; >>> #size-cells = <1>; >>> compatible = "simple-pm-bus"; >>> - ranges; >>> + regs = <0x50200000 0x200000>; >>> + ranges = <0x50200000 0x50200000 0x200000>; >> >> This looks wrong. >> >> The property is called "reg" not "regs". > > Yeah... > >> >> And I don't think that you should provide "reg" at all, >> simply supplying "ranges" should be sufficient, no? > > I don't recall why I put the regs in, I'll drop it if > possible & respond if I can't. > IIRC, it did actually complain. It does not complain. Good spot, thanks. I'll drop "regs" for v4. Conor.
diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k210.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k210.dtsi index 948dc235e39d..6a34dc4f3e51 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k210.dtsi +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k210.dtsi @@ -163,7 +163,8 @@ apb0: bus@50200000 { #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <1>; compatible = "simple-pm-bus"; - ranges; + regs = <0x50200000 0x200000>; + ranges = <0x50200000 0x50200000 0x200000>; clocks = <&sysclk K210_CLK_APB0>; gpio1: gpio@50200000 { @@ -382,7 +383,8 @@ apb1: bus@50400000 { #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <1>; compatible = "simple-pm-bus"; - ranges; + regs = <0x50400000 0x40100>; + ranges = <0x50400000 0x50400000 0x40100>; clocks = <&sysclk K210_CLK_APB1>; wdt0: watchdog@50400000 { @@ -437,7 +439,8 @@ apb2: bus@52000000 { #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <1>; compatible = "simple-pm-bus"; - ranges; + regs = <0x52000000 0x2000200>; + ranges = <0x52000000 0x52000000 0x2000200>; clocks = <&sysclk K210_CLK_APB2>; spi0: spi@52000000 {