[2/2] gpu: host1x: Generalize host1x_cdma_push_wide

Commit Message

Mikko Perttunen July 8, 2022, 3:18 p.m. UTC

From: Mikko Perttunen <[e-mail]>

host1x_cdma_push_wide had the assumptions that the last parameter word
was a NOP opcode, and that NOP opcodes could be used in all situations.

Neither are true with the new job opcode sequence, so adjust the
function to not have these assumptions, and instead place an early
RESTART opcode when necessary to jump back to the beginning of the
pushbuffer.

Signed-off-by: Mikko Perttunen <[e-mail]>
---
 drivers/gpu/host1x/cdma.c | 24 +++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/host1x/cdma.c b/drivers/gpu/host1x/cdma.c
index bb1f3c746be4..103fda055394 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/host1x/cdma.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/host1x/cdma.c
@@ -615,8 +615,8 @@  void host1x_cdma_push_wide(struct host1x_cdma *cdma, u32 op1, u32 op2,
 	struct host1x_channel *channel = cdma_to_channel(cdma);
 	struct host1x *host1x = cdma_to_host1x(cdma);
 	struct push_buffer *pb = &cdma->push_buffer;
-	unsigned int needed = 2, extra = 0, i;
 	unsigned int space = cdma->slots_free;
+	unsigned int needed = 2, extra = 0;
 
 	if (host1x_debug_trace_cmdbuf)
 		trace_host1x_cdma_push_wide(dev_name(channel->dev), op1, op2,
@@ -634,20 +634,14 @@  void host1x_cdma_push_wide(struct host1x_cdma *cdma, u32 op1, u32 op2,
 	cdma->slots_free = space - needed;
 	cdma->slots_used += needed;
 
-	/*
-	 * Note that we rely on the fact that this is only used to submit wide
-	 * gather opcodes, which consist of 3 words, and they are padded with
-	 * a NOP to avoid having to deal with fractional slots (a slot always
-	 * represents 2 words). The fourth opcode passed to this function will
-	 * therefore always be a NOP.
-	 *
-	 * This works around a slight ambiguity when it comes to opcodes. For
-	 * all current host1x incarnations the NOP opcode uses the exact same
-	 * encoding (0x20000000), so we could hard-code the value here, but a
-	 * new incarnation may change it and break that assumption.
-	 */
-	for (i = 0; i < extra; i++)
-		host1x_pushbuffer_push(pb, op4, op4);
+	if (extra > 0) {
+		/*
+		 * If there isn't enough space at the tail of the pushbuffer,
+		 * insert a RESTART(0) here to go back to the beginning.
+		 * The code above adjusted the indexes appropriately.
+		 */
+		host1x_pushbuffer_push(pb, (0x5 << 28), 0xdead0000);
+	}
 
 	host1x_pushbuffer_push(pb, op1, op2);
 	host1x_pushbuffer_push(pb, op3, op4);