@@ -3128,7 +3128,7 @@ static struct drm_dp_mst_port *drm_dp_get_last_connected_port_to_mstb(struct drm
static struct drm_dp_mst_branch *
drm_dp_get_last_connected_port_and_mstb(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb,
- int *port_num)
+ struct drm_dp_mst_port **last_port)
{
struct drm_dp_mst_branch *rmstb = NULL;
struct drm_dp_mst_port *found_port;
@@ -3144,7 +3144,8 @@ drm_dp_get_last_connected_port_and_mstb(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
if (drm_dp_mst_topology_try_get_mstb(found_port->parent)) {
rmstb = found_port->parent;
- *port_num = found_port->port_num;
+ *last_port = found_port;
+ drm_dp_mst_get_port_malloc(found_port);
} else {
/* Search again, starting from this parent */
mstb = found_port->parent;
@@ -3161,7 +3162,7 @@ static int drm_dp_payload_send_msg(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
int pbn)
{
struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *txmsg;
- struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb;
+ struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb = NULL;
int ret, port_num;
u8 sinks[DRM_DP_MAX_SDP_STREAMS];
int i;
@@ -3169,12 +3170,22 @@ static int drm_dp_payload_send_msg(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
port_num = port->port_num;
mstb = drm_dp_mst_topology_get_mstb_validated(mgr, port->parent);
if (!mstb) {
- mstb = drm_dp_get_last_connected_port_and_mstb(mgr,
- port->parent,
- &port_num);
+ struct drm_dp_mst_port *rport = NULL;
+ bool ddps;
+ mstb = drm_dp_get_last_connected_port_and_mstb(mgr, port->parent, &rport);
if (!mstb)
return -EINVAL;
+
+ ddps = rport->ddps;
+ port_num = rport->port_num;
+ drm_dp_mst_put_port_malloc(rport);
+
+ /* If the port is currently marked as disconnected, don't send a payload message */
+ if (!ddps) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto fail_put;
+ }
}
txmsg = kzalloc(sizeof(*txmsg), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -3375,7 +3386,6 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, int start_s
struct drm_dp_mst_port *port;
int i, j;
int cur_slots = start_slot;
- bool skip;
mutex_lock(&mgr->payload_lock);
for (i = 0; i < mgr->max_payloads; i++) {
@@ -3390,16 +3400,6 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, int start_s
port = container_of(vcpi, struct drm_dp_mst_port,
vcpi);
- mutex_lock(&mgr->lock);
- skip = !drm_dp_mst_port_downstream_of_branch(port, mgr->mst_primary);
- mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
-
- if (skip) {
- drm_dbg_kms(mgr->dev,
- "Virtual channel %d is not in current topology\n",
- i);
- continue;
- }
/* Validated ports don't matter if we're releasing
* VCPI
*/
@@ -3500,7 +3500,6 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part2(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
struct drm_dp_mst_port *port;
int i;
int ret = 0;
- bool skip;
mutex_lock(&mgr->payload_lock);
for (i = 0; i < mgr->max_payloads; i++) {
@@ -3510,13 +3509,6 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part2(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
port = container_of(mgr->proposed_vcpis[i], struct drm_dp_mst_port, vcpi);
- mutex_lock(&mgr->lock);
- skip = !drm_dp_mst_port_downstream_of_branch(port, mgr->mst_primary);
- mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
-
- if (skip)
- continue;
-
drm_dbg_kms(mgr->dev, "payload %d %d\n", i, mgr->payloads[i].payload_state);
if (mgr->payloads[i].payload_state == DP_PAYLOAD_LOCAL) {
ret = drm_dp_create_payload_step2(mgr, port, mgr->proposed_vcpis[i]->vcpi, &mgr->payloads[i]);
@@ -4769,18 +4761,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_mst_reset_vcpi_slots);
void drm_dp_mst_deallocate_vcpi(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
struct drm_dp_mst_port *port)
{
- bool skip;
-
if (!port->vcpi.vcpi)
return;
- mutex_lock(&mgr->lock);
- skip = !drm_dp_mst_port_downstream_of_branch(port, mgr->mst_primary);
- mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
-
- if (skip)
- return;
-
drm_dp_mst_put_payload_id(mgr, port->vcpi.vcpi);
port->vcpi.num_slots = 0;
port->vcpi.pbn = 0;
In the past, we've ran into strange issues regarding errors in response to trying to destroy payloads after a port has been unplugged. We fixed this back in: This is intended to replace the workaround that was added here: commit 3769e4c0af5b ("drm/dp_mst: Avoid to mess up payload table by ports in stale topology") which was intended fix to some of the payload leaks that were observed before, where we would attempt to determine if the port was still connected to the topology before updating payloads using drm_dp_mst_port_downstream_of_branch. This wasn't a particularly good solution, since one of the points of still having port and mstb validation is to avoid sending messages to newly disconnected branches wherever possible - thus the required use of drm_dp_mst_port_downstream_of_branch would indicate something may be wrong with said validation. It seems like it may have just been races and luck that made drm_dp_mst_port_downstream_of_branch work however, as while I was trying to figure out the true cause of this issue when removing the legacy MST code - I discovered an important excerpt in section 2.14.2.3.3.6 of the DP 2.0 specs: "BAD_PARAM - This reply is transmitted when a Message Transaction parameter is in error; for example, the next port number is invalid or /no device is connected/ to the port associated with the port number." Sure enough - removing the calls to drm_dp_mst_port_downstream_of_branch() and instead checking the ->ddps field of the parent port to see whether we should release a given payload or not seems to totally fix the issue. This does actually make sense to me, as it seems the implication is that given a topology where an MSTB is removed, the payload for the MST parent's port will be released automatically if that port is also marked as disconnected. However, if there's another parent in the chain after that which is connected - payloads must be released there with an ALLOCATE_PAYLOAD message. So, let's do that! Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run> Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 51 +++++++------------ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)