@@ -50,11 +50,11 @@ int i915_user_extensions(struct i915_user_extension __user *ext,
if (err)
return err;
- if (get_user(next, &ext->next_extension) ||
- overflows_type(next, ext))
+ if (get_user(next, &ext->next_extension))
return -EFAULT;
- ext = u64_to_user_ptr(next);
+ if (check_assign_user_ptr(next, ext))
+ return -EFAULT;
}
return 0;
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
#include <linux/compiler.h>
#include <linux/limits.h>
#include <linux/const.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
/*
* We need to compute the minimum and maximum values representable in a given
@@ -127,6 +128,49 @@ static inline bool __must_check __must_check_overflow(bool overflow)
(*_d >> _to_shift) != _a); \
}))
+/**
+ * check_assign - perform an assigning source value into destination pointer
+ * along with an overflow check.
+ *
+ * @value: source value
+ * @ptr: Destination pointer address
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ * If the value would overflow the destination, it returns true. If not return
+ * false. When overflow does not occur, the assigning into destination from
+ * value succeeds. It follows the return policy as other check_*_overflow()
+ * functions return non-zero as a failure.
+ */
+#define check_assign(value, ptr) __must_check_overflow(({ \
+ check_add_overflow(0, value, ptr); \
+}))
+
+/**
+ * check_assign_user_ptr - perform an assigning source value into destination
+ * pointer type variable along with an overflow check
+ *
+ * @value: source value; a source value is expected to have a value of a size
+ * that can be stored in a pointer-type variable.
+ * @ptr: destination pointer type variable
+ *
+ * u64_to_user_ptr can be used in the kernel to avoid warnings about integers
+ * and pointers of different sizes. But u64_to_user_ptr is not performing the
+ * checking of overflow. If you need an explicit overflow check while
+ * assigning, check_assign_user_ptr() can be used to assign integers into
+ * pointers along with an overflow check. If ptr is not a pointer type,
+ * a warning message outputs while compiling.
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ * If the value would overflow the destination, it returns true. If not return
+ * false. When overflow does not occur, the assigning into ptr from value
+ * succeeds. It follows the return policy as other check_*_overflow() functions
+ * return non-zero as a failure.
+ */
+#define check_assign_user_ptr(value, ptr) __must_check_overflow(({ \
+ uintptr_t kptr; \
+ check_assign(value, &kptr) ? 1 : (({ ptr = (void __user *)kptr; }), 0); \
+}))
+
/**
* size_mul() - Calculate size_t multiplication with saturation at SIZE_MAX
*
Add check_assign() macro which performs an assigning source value into destination pointer along with an overflow check and check_assign_user_ptr() macro which performs an assigning source value into destination pointer type variable along with an overflow check. If an explicit overflow check is required while assigning to a user-space ptr, assign_user_ptr() can be used instead of u64_to_user_ptr() to assign integers into __user pointers along with an overflow check. v3: Add is_type_unsigned() macro (Mauro) Modify overflows_type() macro to consider signed data types (Mauro) Fix the problem that safe_conversion() macro always returns true v4: Fix kernel-doc markups v6: Move macro addition location so that it can be used by other than drm subsystem (Jani, Mauro, Andi) Change is_type_unsigned to is_unsigned_type to have the same name form as is_signed_type macro v8: Add check_assign() and remove safe_conversion() (Kees) Fix overflows_type() to use gcc's built-in overflow function (Andrzej) Add overflows_ptr() to allow overflow checking when assigning a value into a pointer variable (G.G.) v9: Fix overflows_type() to use __builtin_add_overflow() instead of __builtin_add_overflow_p() (Andrzej) Fix overflows_ptr() to use overflows_type() with the unsigned long type (Andrzej) v10: Remove a redundant type checking for a pointer. (Andrzej) Use updated check_add_overflow macro instead of __builtin_add_overflow (G.G) Add check_assign_user_ptr() macro and drop overflows_ptr() macro(Kees) v11: Fix incorrect type assignment between different address spaces caused by the wrong use of __user macro. (kernel test robot) Update macro description (G.G) v12: Remove overflows_type() macro here. updated overflows_type() macro will be added in a subsequent patch (G.G) Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mauro.chehab@linux.intel.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org> (v5) Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com> (v9) Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_user_extensions.c | 6 +-- include/linux/overflow.h | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)