diff mbox series

[V10,1/8] ACPI: Add support for AMD ACPI based Wifi band RFI mitigation feature

Message ID 20230825083846.4001973-2-evan.quan@amd.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series Enable Wifi RFI interference mitigation feature support | expand

Commit Message

Evan Quan Aug. 25, 2023, 8:38 a.m. UTC
Due to electrical and mechanical constraints in certain platform designs
there may be likely interference of relatively high-powered harmonics of
the (G-)DDR memory clocks with local radio module frequency bands used
by Wifi 6/6e/7.

To mitigate this, AMD has introduced a mechanism that devices can use to
notify active use of particular frequencies so that other devices can make
relative internal adjustments as necessary to avoid this resonance.

Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/Kconfig          |  17 ++
 drivers/acpi/Makefile         |   2 +
 drivers/acpi/amd_wbrf.c       | 414 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/acpi_amd_wbrf.h | 140 ++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 573 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/amd_wbrf.c
 create mode 100644 include/linux/acpi_amd_wbrf.h

Comments

Simon Horman Aug. 27, 2023, 3:43 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 04:38:39PM +0800, Evan Quan wrote:
> Due to electrical and mechanical constraints in certain platform designs
> there may be likely interference of relatively high-powered harmonics of
> the (G-)DDR memory clocks with local radio module frequency bands used
> by Wifi 6/6e/7.
> 
> To mitigate this, AMD has introduced a mechanism that devices can use to
> notify active use of particular frequencies so that other devices can make
> relative internal adjustments as necessary to avoid this resonance.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>

...

> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/amd_wbrf.c b/drivers/acpi/amd_wbrf.c

...

> +/**
> + * acpi_amd_wbrf_add_exclusion - broadcast the frequency band the device
> + *                               is using
> + *
> + * @dev: device pointer
> + * @in: input structure containing the frequency band the device is using
> + *
> + * Broadcast to other consumers the frequency band the device starts
> + * to use. Underneath the surface the information is cached into an
> + * internal buffer first. Then a notification is sent to all those
> + * registered consumers. So then they can retrieve that buffer to
> + * know the latest active frequency bands. The benifit with such design

nit: ./checkpatch.pl --codespell suggests benifit -> benefit.

> + * is for those consumers which have not been registered yet, they can
> + * still have a chance to retrieve such information later.
> + */
> +int acpi_amd_wbrf_add_exclusion(struct device *dev,
> +				struct wbrf_ranges_in_out *in)
> +{
> +	struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!adev)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	ret = wbrf_record(adev, WBRF_RECORD_ADD, in);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	blocking_notifier_call_chain(&wbrf_chain_head,
> +				     WBRF_CHANGED,
> +				     NULL);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_amd_wbrf_add_exclusion);

...
Evan Quan Aug. 28, 2023, 2:11 a.m. UTC | #2
[AMD Official Use Only - General]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
> Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2023 11:43 PM
> To: Quan, Evan <Evan.Quan@amd.com>
> Cc: lenb@kernel.org; johannes@sipsolutions.net; davem@davemloft.net;
> edumazet@google.com; kuba@kernel.org; pabeni@redhat.com; Deucher,
> Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>; rafael@kernel.org; Lazar, Lijo
> <Lijo.Lazar@amd.com>; Limonciello, Mario <Mario.Limonciello@amd.com>;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org; amd-
> gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; linux-
> wireless@vger.kernel.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [V10 1/8] ACPI: Add support for AMD ACPI based Wifi band RFI
> mitigation feature
>
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 04:38:39PM +0800, Evan Quan wrote:
> > Due to electrical and mechanical constraints in certain platform
> > designs there may be likely interference of relatively high-powered
> > harmonics of the (G-)DDR memory clocks with local radio module
> > frequency bands used by Wifi 6/6e/7.
> >
> > To mitigate this, AMD has introduced a mechanism that devices can use
> > to notify active use of particular frequencies so that other devices
> > can make relative internal adjustments as necessary to avoid this resonance.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
>
> ...
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/amd_wbrf.c b/drivers/acpi/amd_wbrf.c
>
> ...
>
> > +/**
> > + * acpi_amd_wbrf_add_exclusion - broadcast the frequency band the
> device
> > + *                               is using
> > + *
> > + * @dev: device pointer
> > + * @in: input structure containing the frequency band the device is
> > +using
> > + *
> > + * Broadcast to other consumers the frequency band the device starts
> > + * to use. Underneath the surface the information is cached into an
> > + * internal buffer first. Then a notification is sent to all those
> > + * registered consumers. So then they can retrieve that buffer to
> > + * know the latest active frequency bands. The benifit with such
> > +design
>
> nit: ./checkpatch.pl --codespell suggests benifit -> benefit.
Thanks, will fix that.

Evan
>
> > + * is for those consumers which have not been registered yet, they
> > +can
> > + * still have a chance to retrieve such information later.
> > + */
> > +int acpi_amd_wbrf_add_exclusion(struct device *dev,
> > +                           struct wbrf_ranges_in_out *in)
> > +{
> > +   struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
> > +   int ret;
> > +
> > +   if (!adev)
> > +           return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > +   ret = wbrf_record(adev, WBRF_RECORD_ADD, in);
> > +   if (ret)
> > +           return ret;
> > +
> > +   blocking_notifier_call_chain(&wbrf_chain_head,
> > +                                WBRF_CHANGED,
> > +                                NULL);
> > +
> > +   return 0;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_amd_wbrf_add_exclusion);
>
> ...
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
index 00dd309b6682..a092ea72d152 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
@@ -594,6 +594,23 @@  config ACPI_PRMT
 	  substantially increase computational overhead related to the
 	  initialization of some server systems.
 
+config WBRF_AMD_ACPI
+	bool "ACPI based WBRF mechanism introduced by AMD"
+	depends on ACPI
+	default n
+	help
+	  Wifi band RFI mitigation mechanism allows multiple drivers from
+	  different domains to notify the frequencies in use so that hardware
+	  can be reconfigured to avoid harmonic conflicts.
+
+	  AMD has introduced an ACPI based mechanism to support WBRF for some
+	  platforms with AMD dGPU and WLAN. This needs support from BIOS equipped
+	  with necessary AML implementations and dGPU firmwares.
+
+	  Before enabling this ACPI based mechanism, it is suggested to confirm
+	  with the hardware designer/provider first whether your platform
+	  equipped with necessary BIOS and firmwares.
+
 endif	# ACPI
 
 config X86_PM_TIMER
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Makefile b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
index 3fc5a0d54f6e..9185d16e4495 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
@@ -133,3 +133,5 @@  obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64)		+= arm64/
 obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_VIOT)		+= viot.o
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV)		+= riscv/
+
+obj-$(CONFIG_WBRF_AMD_ACPI)	+= amd_wbrf.o
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/amd_wbrf.c b/drivers/acpi/amd_wbrf.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..98663b2bfd54
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/acpi/amd_wbrf.c
@@ -0,0 +1,414 @@ 
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Wifi Band Exclusion Interface (AMD ACPI Implementation)
+ * Copyright (C) 2023 Advanced Micro Devices
+ *
+ */
+
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
+#include <linux/acpi_amd_wbrf.h>
+
+#define ACPI_AMD_WBRF_METHOD	"\\WBRF"
+
+/*
+ * Functions bit vector for WBRF method
+ *
+ * Bit 0: Supported for any functions other than function 0.
+ * Bit 1: Function 1 (Add / Remove frequency) is supported.
+ * Bit 2: Function 2 (Get frequency list) is supported.
+ */
+#define WBRF_ENABLED				0x0
+#define WBRF_RECORD				0x1
+#define WBRF_RETRIEVE				0x2
+
+/* record actions */
+#define WBRF_RECORD_ADD		0x0
+#define WBRF_RECORD_REMOVE	0x1
+
+#define WBRF_REVISION		0x1
+
+/*
+ * The data structure used for WBRF_RETRIEVE is not naturally aligned.
+ * And unfortunately the design has been settled down.
+ */
+struct amd_wbrf_ranges_out {
+	u32			num_of_ranges;
+	struct exclusion_range	band_list[MAX_NUM_OF_WBRF_RANGES];
+} __packed;
+
+static const guid_t wifi_acpi_dsm_guid =
+	GUID_INIT(0x7b7656cf, 0xdc3d, 0x4c1c,
+		  0x83, 0xe9, 0x66, 0xe7, 0x21, 0xde, 0x30, 0x70);
+
+static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(wbrf_chain_head);
+
+static int wbrf_dsm(struct acpi_device *adev,
+		    u8 fn,
+		    union acpi_object *argv4)
+{
+	union acpi_object *obj;
+	int rc;
+
+	obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(adev->handle, &wifi_acpi_dsm_guid,
+				WBRF_REVISION, fn, argv4);
+	if (!obj)
+		return -ENXIO;
+
+	switch (obj->type) {
+	case ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER:
+		rc = obj->integer.value ? -EINVAL : 0;
+		break;
+	default:
+		rc = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
+
+	ACPI_FREE(obj);
+
+	return rc;
+}
+
+static int wbrf_record(struct acpi_device *adev, uint8_t action,
+		       struct wbrf_ranges_in_out *in)
+{
+	union acpi_object argv4;
+	union acpi_object *tmp;
+	u32 num_of_ranges = 0;
+	u32 num_of_elements;
+	u32 arg_idx = 0;
+	u32 loop_idx;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (!in)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	for (loop_idx = 0; loop_idx < ARRAY_SIZE(in->band_list);
+	     loop_idx++)
+		if (in->band_list[loop_idx].start &&
+		    in->band_list[loop_idx].end)
+			num_of_ranges++;
+
+	/*
+	 * The valid entry counter does not match with this told.
+	 * Something must went wrong.
+	 */
+	if (num_of_ranges != in->num_of_ranges)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/*
+	 * Every input frequency band comes with two end points(start/end)
+	 * and each is accounted as an element. Meanwhile the range count
+	 * and action type are accounted as an element each.
+	 * So, the total element count = 2 * num_of_ranges + 1 + 1.
+	 */
+	num_of_elements = 2 * num_of_ranges + 1 + 1;
+
+	tmp = kcalloc(num_of_elements, sizeof(*tmp), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!tmp)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	argv4.package.type = ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE;
+	argv4.package.count = num_of_elements;
+	argv4.package.elements = tmp;
+
+	tmp[arg_idx].integer.type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
+	tmp[arg_idx++].integer.value = num_of_ranges;
+	tmp[arg_idx].integer.type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
+	tmp[arg_idx++].integer.value = action;
+
+	for (loop_idx = 0; loop_idx < ARRAY_SIZE(in->band_list);
+	     loop_idx++) {
+		if (!in->band_list[loop_idx].start ||
+		    !in->band_list[loop_idx].end)
+			continue;
+
+		tmp[arg_idx].integer.type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
+		tmp[arg_idx++].integer.value = in->band_list[loop_idx].start;
+		tmp[arg_idx].integer.type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
+		tmp[arg_idx++].integer.value = in->band_list[loop_idx].end;
+	}
+
+	ret = wbrf_dsm(adev, WBRF_RECORD, &argv4);
+
+	kfree(tmp);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+/**
+ * acpi_amd_wbrf_add_exclusion - broadcast the frequency band the device
+ *                               is using
+ *
+ * @dev: device pointer
+ * @in: input structure containing the frequency band the device is using
+ *
+ * Broadcast to other consumers the frequency band the device starts
+ * to use. Underneath the surface the information is cached into an
+ * internal buffer first. Then a notification is sent to all those
+ * registered consumers. So then they can retrieve that buffer to
+ * know the latest active frequency bands. The benifit with such design
+ * is for those consumers which have not been registered yet, they can
+ * still have a chance to retrieve such information later.
+ */
+int acpi_amd_wbrf_add_exclusion(struct device *dev,
+				struct wbrf_ranges_in_out *in)
+{
+	struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
+	int ret;
+
+	if (!adev)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	ret = wbrf_record(adev, WBRF_RECORD_ADD, in);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	blocking_notifier_call_chain(&wbrf_chain_head,
+				     WBRF_CHANGED,
+				     NULL);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_amd_wbrf_add_exclusion);
+
+/**
+ * acpi_amd_wbrf_remove_exclusion - broadcast the frequency band the device
+ *                                  is no longer using
+ *
+ * @dev: device pointer
+ * @in: input structure containing the frequency band which is not used
+ *      by the device any more
+ *
+ * Broadcast to other consumers the frequency band the device stops
+ * to use. The stored information paired with this will be dropped
+ * from the internal buffer. And then a notification is sent to
+ * all registered consumers.
+ */
+int acpi_amd_wbrf_remove_exclusion(struct device *dev,
+				   struct wbrf_ranges_in_out *in)
+{
+	struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
+	int ret;
+
+	if (!adev)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	ret = wbrf_record(adev, WBRF_RECORD_REMOVE, in);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	blocking_notifier_call_chain(&wbrf_chain_head,
+				     WBRF_CHANGED,
+				     NULL);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_amd_wbrf_remove_exclusion);
+
+static bool acpi_amd_wbrf_supported_system(void)
+{
+	acpi_status status;
+	acpi_handle handle;
+
+	status = acpi_get_handle(NULL, ACPI_AMD_WBRF_METHOD, &handle);
+
+	return ACPI_SUCCESS(status);
+}
+
+/**
+ * acpi_amd_wbrf_supported_producer - determine if the WBRF can be enabled
+ *                                    for the device as a producer
+ *
+ * @dev: device pointer
+ *
+ * Determine if the platform equipped with necessary implementations to
+ * support WBRF for the device as a producer.
+ */
+bool acpi_amd_wbrf_supported_producer(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
+
+	if (!acpi_amd_wbrf_supported_system())
+		return false;
+
+	if (!adev)
+		return false;
+
+	return acpi_check_dsm(adev->handle, &wifi_acpi_dsm_guid,
+			      WBRF_REVISION,
+			      BIT(WBRF_RECORD));
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_amd_wbrf_supported_producer);
+
+static union acpi_object *
+acpi_evaluate_wbrf(acpi_handle handle, u64 rev, u64 func)
+{
+	acpi_status ret;
+	struct acpi_buffer buf = {ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL};
+	union acpi_object params[4];
+	struct acpi_object_list input = {
+		.count = 4,
+		.pointer = params,
+	};
+
+	params[0].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
+	params[0].integer.value = rev;
+	params[1].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
+	params[1].integer.value = func;
+	params[2].type = ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE;
+	params[2].package.count = 0;
+	params[2].package.elements = NULL;
+	params[3].type = ACPI_TYPE_STRING;
+	params[3].string.length = 0;
+	params[3].string.pointer = NULL;
+
+	ret = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "WBRF", &input, &buf);
+	if (ACPI_FAILURE(ret))
+		return NULL;
+
+	return buf.pointer;
+}
+
+static bool check_acpi_wbrf(acpi_handle handle, u64 rev, u64 funcs)
+{
+	int i;
+	u64 mask = 0;
+	union acpi_object *obj;
+
+	if (funcs == 0)
+		return false;
+
+	obj = acpi_evaluate_wbrf(handle, rev, 0);
+	if (!obj)
+		return false;
+
+	if (obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER)
+		return false;
+
+	/*
+	 * Bit vector providing supported functions information.
+	 * Each bit marks support for one specific function of the WBRF method.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < obj->buffer.length && i < 8; i++)
+		mask |= (u64)obj->buffer.pointer[i] << i * 8;
+
+	ACPI_FREE(obj);
+
+	return mask & BIT(WBRF_ENABLED) && (mask & funcs) == funcs;
+}
+
+/**
+ * acpi_amd_wbrf_supported_consumer - determine if the WBRF can be enabled
+ *                                    for the device as a consumer
+ *
+ * @dev: device pointer
+ *
+ * Determine if the platform equipped with necessary implementations to
+ * support WBRF for the device as a consumer.
+ */
+bool acpi_amd_wbrf_supported_consumer(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
+
+	if (!acpi_amd_wbrf_supported_system())
+		return false;
+
+	if (!adev)
+		return false;
+
+	return check_acpi_wbrf(adev->handle,
+			       WBRF_REVISION,
+			       BIT(WBRF_RETRIEVE));
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_amd_wbrf_supported_consumer);
+
+/**
+ * acpi_amd_wbrf_retrieve_exclusions - retrieve current active frequency
+ *                                     bands
+ *
+ * @dev: device pointer
+ * @out: output structure containing all the active frequency bands
+ *
+ * Retrieve the current active frequency bands which were broadcasted
+ * by other producers. The consumer who calls this API should take
+ * proper actions if any of the frequency band may cause RFI with its
+ * own frequency band used.
+ */
+int acpi_amd_wbrf_retrieve_exclusions(struct device *dev,
+				      struct wbrf_ranges_in_out *out)
+{
+	struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
+	struct amd_wbrf_ranges_out acpi_out = {0};
+	union acpi_object *obj;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	if (!adev)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	obj = acpi_evaluate_wbrf(adev->handle,
+				 WBRF_REVISION,
+				 WBRF_RETRIEVE);
+	if (!obj)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/*
+	 * The return buffer is with variable length and the format below:
+	 * number_of_entries(1 DWORD):       Number of entries
+	 * start_freq of 1st entry(1 QWORD): Start frequency of the 1st entry
+	 * end_freq of 1st entry(1 QWORD):   End frequency of the 1st entry
+	 * ...
+	 * ...
+	 * start_freq of the last entry(1 QWORD)
+	 * end_freq of the last entry(1 QWORD)
+	 *
+	 * Thus the buffer length is determined by the number of entries.
+	 * - For zero entry scenario, the buffer length will be 4 bytes.
+	 * - For one entry scenario, the buffer length will be 20 bytes.
+	 */
+	if (obj->buffer.length > sizeof(acpi_out) ||
+	    obj->buffer.length < 4) {
+		dev_err(dev, "Wrong sized WBRT information");
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+	memcpy(&acpi_out, obj->buffer.pointer, obj->buffer.length);
+
+	out->num_of_ranges = acpi_out.num_of_ranges;
+	memcpy(out->band_list, acpi_out.band_list, sizeof(acpi_out.band_list));
+
+out:
+	ACPI_FREE(obj);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_amd_wbrf_retrieve_exclusions);
+
+/**
+ * acpi_amd_wbrf_register_notifier - register for notifications of frequency
+ *                                   band update
+ *
+ * @nb: driver notifier block
+ *
+ * The consumer should register itself via this API. So that it can get
+ * notified timely on the frequency band updates from other producers.
+ */
+int acpi_amd_wbrf_register_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
+{
+	return blocking_notifier_chain_register(&wbrf_chain_head, nb);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_amd_wbrf_register_notifier);
+
+/**
+ * acpi_amd_wbrf_unregister_notifier - unregister for notifications of
+ *                                     frequency band update
+ *
+ * @nb: driver notifier block
+ *
+ * The consumer should call this API when it is longer interested with
+ * the frequency band updates from other producers. Usually, this should
+ * be performed during driver cleanup.
+ */
+int acpi_amd_wbrf_unregister_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
+{
+	return blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(&wbrf_chain_head, nb);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_amd_wbrf_unregister_notifier);
diff --git a/include/linux/acpi_amd_wbrf.h b/include/linux/acpi_amd_wbrf.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..c2363d664641
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/acpi_amd_wbrf.h
@@ -0,0 +1,140 @@ 
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Wifi Band Exclusion Interface (AMD ACPI Implementation)
+ * Copyright (C) 2023 Advanced Micro Devices
+ *
+ * Due to electrical and mechanical constraints in certain platform designs
+ * there may be likely interference of relatively high-powered harmonics of
+ * the (G-)DDR memory clocks with local radio module frequency bands used
+ * by Wifi 6/6e/7.
+ *
+ * To mitigate this, AMD has introduced an ACPI based mechanism to support
+ * WBRF(Wifi Band RFI mitigation Feature) for platforms with AMD dGPU + WLAN.
+ * This needs support from BIOS equipped with necessary AML implementations
+ * and dGPU firmwares.
+ *
+ * Some general terms:
+ * Producer: such component who can produce high-powered radio frequency
+ * Consumer: such component who can adjust its in-use frequency in
+ *           response to the radio frequencies of other components to
+ *           mitigate the possible RFI.
+ *
+ * To make the mechanism function, those producers should notify active use
+ * of their particular frequencies so that other consumers can make relative
+ * internal adjustments as necessary to avoid this resonance.
+ */
+
+#ifndef _ACPI_AMD_WBRF_H
+#define _ACPI_AMD_WBRF_H
+
+#include <linux/device.h>
+#include <linux/notifier.h>
+
+/*
+ * A wbrf range is defined as a frequency band with start and end
+ * frequency point specified(in Hz). And a vaild range should have
+ * its start and end frequency point filled with non-zero values.
+ * Meanwhile, the maximum number of wbrf ranges is limited as
+ * `MAX_NUM_OF_WBRF_RANGES`.
+ */
+#define MAX_NUM_OF_WBRF_RANGES		11
+
+struct exclusion_range {
+	u64		start;
+	u64		end;
+};
+
+struct wbrf_ranges_in_out {
+	u64			num_of_ranges;
+	struct exclusion_range	band_list[MAX_NUM_OF_WBRF_RANGES];
+};
+
+/*
+ * The notification types for the consumers are defined as below.
+ * The consumers may need to take different actions in response to
+ * different notifications.
+ * WBRF_CHANGED: there was some frequency band updates. The consumers
+ *               should retrieve the latest active frequency bands.
+ */
+enum wbrf_notifier_actions {
+	WBRF_CHANGED,
+};
+
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_WBRF_AMD_ACPI)
+/*
+ * The expected flow for the producers:
+ * 1) During probe, call `acpi_amd_wbrf_supported_producer` to check
+ *    if WBRF can be enabled for the device.
+ * 2) On using some frequency band, call `acpi_amd_wbrf_add_exclusion`
+ *    to get other consumers properly notified.
+ * 3) Or on stopping using some frequency band, call
+ *    `acpi_amd_wbrf_remove_exclusion` to get other consumers notified.
+ */
+bool acpi_amd_wbrf_supported_producer(struct device *dev);
+int acpi_amd_wbrf_remove_exclusion(struct device *dev,
+				   struct wbrf_ranges_in_out *in);
+int acpi_amd_wbrf_add_exclusion(struct device *dev,
+				struct wbrf_ranges_in_out *in);
+
+/*
+ * The expected flow for the consumers:
+ * 1) During probe, call `acpi_amd_wbrf_supported_consumer` to check if WBRF
+ *    can be enabled for the device.
+ * 2) Call `acpi_amd_wbrf_register_notifier` to register for notification
+ *    of frequency band change(add or remove) from other producers.
+ * 3) Call the `acpi_amd_wbrf_retrieve_exclusions` intentionally to retrieve
+ *    current active frequency bands considering some producers may broadcast
+ *    such information before the consumer is up.
+ * 4) On receiving a notification for frequency band change, run
+ *    `acpi_amd_wbrf_retrieve_exclusions` again to retrieve the latest
+ *    active frequency bands.
+ * 5) During driver cleanup, call `acpi_amd_wbrf_unregister_notifier` to
+ *    unregister the notifier.
+ */
+bool acpi_amd_wbrf_supported_consumer(struct device *dev);
+int acpi_amd_wbrf_retrieve_exclusions(struct device *dev,
+				      struct wbrf_ranges_in_out *out);
+int acpi_amd_wbrf_register_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
+int acpi_amd_wbrf_unregister_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
+#else
+static inline
+bool acpi_amd_wbrf_supported_consumer(struct device *dev)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+static inline
+int acpi_amd_wbrf_remove_exclusion(struct device *dev,
+				   struct wbrf_ranges_in_out *in)
+{
+	return -ENODEV;
+}
+static inline
+int acpi_amd_wbrf_add_exclusion(struct device *dev,
+				struct wbrf_ranges_in_out *in)
+{
+	return -ENODEV;
+}
+static inline
+bool acpi_amd_wbrf_supported_producer(struct device *dev)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+static inline
+int acpi_amd_wbrf_retrieve_exclusions(struct device *dev,
+				      struct wbrf_ranges_in_out *out)
+{
+	return -ENODEV;
+}
+static inline
+int acpi_amd_wbrf_register_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
+{
+	return -ENODEV;
+}
+static inline
+int acpi_amd_wbrf_unregister_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
+{
+	return -ENODEV;
+}
+#endif
+
+#endif /* _ACPI_AMD_WBRF_H */