Message ID | 20230901164842.178654-4-stanislaw.gruszka@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | accel/ivpu: Use GEM shmem | expand |
On 9/1/2023 10:48 AM, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > From: Jacek Lawrynowicz <jacek.lawrynowicz@linux.intel.com> > > Usages of DRM_IVPU_BO_UNCACHED should be replaced by DRM_IVPU_BO_WC. > There is no functional benefit from DRM_IVPU_BO_UNCACHED if these > buffers are never mapped to host VM. > > This allows to cut the buffer handling code in the kernel driver > by half. > > Signed-off-by: Jacek Lawrynowicz <jacek.lawrynowicz@linux.intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <stanislaw.gruszka@linux.intel.com> > --- > drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_fw.c | 2 +- > drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_gem.c | 3 --- > include/uapi/drm/ivpu_accel.h | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_fw.c b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_fw.c > index 2fef9fe154aa..8ab0f3225205 100644 > --- a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_fw.c > +++ b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_fw.c > @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ static int ivpu_fw_mem_init(struct ivpu_device *vdev) > > if (fw->shave_nn_size) { > fw->mem_shave_nn = ivpu_bo_alloc_internal(vdev, vdev->hw->ranges.shave.start, > - fw->shave_nn_size, DRM_IVPU_BO_UNCACHED); > + fw->shave_nn_size, DRM_IVPU_BO_WC); > if (!fw->mem_shave_nn) { > ivpu_err(vdev, "Failed to allocate shavenn buffer\n"); > ret = -ENOMEM; > diff --git a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_gem.c b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_gem.c > index 915c53d7bb97..2a91eb1e3627 100644 > --- a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_gem.c > +++ b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_gem.c > @@ -89,8 +89,6 @@ static int __must_check shmem_alloc_pages_locked(struct ivpu_bo *bo) > > if (bo->flags & DRM_IVPU_BO_WC) > set_pages_array_wc(pages, npages); > - else if (bo->flags & DRM_IVPU_BO_UNCACHED) > - set_pages_array_uc(pages, npages); > > bo->pages = pages; > return 0; > @@ -366,7 +364,6 @@ ivpu_bo_alloc(struct ivpu_device *vdev, u64 size, u32 flags, const struct ivpu_b > > switch (flags & DRM_IVPU_BO_CACHE_MASK) { > case DRM_IVPU_BO_CACHED: > - case DRM_IVPU_BO_UNCACHED: > case DRM_IVPU_BO_WC: > break; > default: > diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/ivpu_accel.h b/include/uapi/drm/ivpu_accel.h > index 262db0c3beee..de1944e42c65 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/drm/ivpu_accel.h > +++ b/include/uapi/drm/ivpu_accel.h > @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ struct drm_ivpu_bo_create { > * > * %DRM_IVPU_BO_UNCACHED: > * > - * Allocated BO will not be cached on host side nor snooped on the VPU side. > + * Not supported. Use DRM_IVPU_BO_WC instead. > * > * %DRM_IVPU_BO_WC: > * Feels like this will break existing userspace. You could see if userspace specified UNCACHED and change it to WC before processing the request. Maybe also use WARN_ONCE to indicate that userspace should be updated. Or is it the case that userspace never actually used this?
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 09:24:42AM -0600, Jeffrey Hugo wrote: > On 9/1/2023 10:48 AM, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > > From: Jacek Lawrynowicz <jacek.lawrynowicz@linux.intel.com> > > > > Usages of DRM_IVPU_BO_UNCACHED should be replaced by DRM_IVPU_BO_WC. > > There is no functional benefit from DRM_IVPU_BO_UNCACHED if these > > buffers are never mapped to host VM. > > > > This allows to cut the buffer handling code in the kernel driver > > by half. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jacek Lawrynowicz <jacek.lawrynowicz@linux.intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <stanislaw.gruszka@linux.intel.com> > > --- > > drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_fw.c | 2 +- > > drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_gem.c | 3 --- > > include/uapi/drm/ivpu_accel.h | 2 +- > > 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_fw.c b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_fw.c > > index 2fef9fe154aa..8ab0f3225205 100644 > > --- a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_fw.c > > +++ b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_fw.c > > @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ static int ivpu_fw_mem_init(struct ivpu_device *vdev) > > if (fw->shave_nn_size) { > > fw->mem_shave_nn = ivpu_bo_alloc_internal(vdev, vdev->hw->ranges.shave.start, > > - fw->shave_nn_size, DRM_IVPU_BO_UNCACHED); > > + fw->shave_nn_size, DRM_IVPU_BO_WC); > > if (!fw->mem_shave_nn) { > > ivpu_err(vdev, "Failed to allocate shavenn buffer\n"); > > ret = -ENOMEM; > > diff --git a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_gem.c b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_gem.c > > index 915c53d7bb97..2a91eb1e3627 100644 > > --- a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_gem.c > > +++ b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_gem.c > > @@ -89,8 +89,6 @@ static int __must_check shmem_alloc_pages_locked(struct ivpu_bo *bo) > > if (bo->flags & DRM_IVPU_BO_WC) > > set_pages_array_wc(pages, npages); > > - else if (bo->flags & DRM_IVPU_BO_UNCACHED) > > - set_pages_array_uc(pages, npages); > > bo->pages = pages; > > return 0; > > @@ -366,7 +364,6 @@ ivpu_bo_alloc(struct ivpu_device *vdev, u64 size, u32 flags, const struct ivpu_b > > switch (flags & DRM_IVPU_BO_CACHE_MASK) { > > case DRM_IVPU_BO_CACHED: > > - case DRM_IVPU_BO_UNCACHED: > > case DRM_IVPU_BO_WC: > > break; > > default: > > diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/ivpu_accel.h b/include/uapi/drm/ivpu_accel.h > > index 262db0c3beee..de1944e42c65 100644 > > --- a/include/uapi/drm/ivpu_accel.h > > +++ b/include/uapi/drm/ivpu_accel.h > > @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ struct drm_ivpu_bo_create { > > * > > * %DRM_IVPU_BO_UNCACHED: > > * > > - * Allocated BO will not be cached on host side nor snooped on the VPU side. > > + * Not supported. Use DRM_IVPU_BO_WC instead. > > * > > * %DRM_IVPU_BO_WC: > > * > > Feels like this will break existing userspace. You could see if userspace > specified UNCACHED and change it to WC before processing the request. Maybe > also use WARN_ONCE to indicate that userspace should be updated. > > Or is it the case that userspace never actually used this? Usage of those buffers was removed some time ago: https://github.com/intel/linux-vpu-driver/commit/c473c9826cb28fa3dcf8883fc804b1e84c6b5fb1 And will not be part of first user-mode driver release. I think we can safely do the change. Regards Stanislaw
On 9/19/2023 3:49 AM, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 09:24:42AM -0600, Jeffrey Hugo wrote: >> On 9/1/2023 10:48 AM, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: >>> From: Jacek Lawrynowicz <jacek.lawrynowicz@linux.intel.com> >>> >>> Usages of DRM_IVPU_BO_UNCACHED should be replaced by DRM_IVPU_BO_WC. >>> There is no functional benefit from DRM_IVPU_BO_UNCACHED if these >>> buffers are never mapped to host VM. >>> >>> This allows to cut the buffer handling code in the kernel driver >>> by half. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jacek Lawrynowicz <jacek.lawrynowicz@linux.intel.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <stanislaw.gruszka@linux.intel.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_fw.c | 2 +- >>> drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_gem.c | 3 --- >>> include/uapi/drm/ivpu_accel.h | 2 +- >>> 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_fw.c b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_fw.c >>> index 2fef9fe154aa..8ab0f3225205 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_fw.c >>> +++ b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_fw.c >>> @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ static int ivpu_fw_mem_init(struct ivpu_device *vdev) >>> if (fw->shave_nn_size) { >>> fw->mem_shave_nn = ivpu_bo_alloc_internal(vdev, vdev->hw->ranges.shave.start, >>> - fw->shave_nn_size, DRM_IVPU_BO_UNCACHED); >>> + fw->shave_nn_size, DRM_IVPU_BO_WC); >>> if (!fw->mem_shave_nn) { >>> ivpu_err(vdev, "Failed to allocate shavenn buffer\n"); >>> ret = -ENOMEM; >>> diff --git a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_gem.c b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_gem.c >>> index 915c53d7bb97..2a91eb1e3627 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_gem.c >>> +++ b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_gem.c >>> @@ -89,8 +89,6 @@ static int __must_check shmem_alloc_pages_locked(struct ivpu_bo *bo) >>> if (bo->flags & DRM_IVPU_BO_WC) >>> set_pages_array_wc(pages, npages); >>> - else if (bo->flags & DRM_IVPU_BO_UNCACHED) >>> - set_pages_array_uc(pages, npages); >>> bo->pages = pages; >>> return 0; >>> @@ -366,7 +364,6 @@ ivpu_bo_alloc(struct ivpu_device *vdev, u64 size, u32 flags, const struct ivpu_b >>> switch (flags & DRM_IVPU_BO_CACHE_MASK) { >>> case DRM_IVPU_BO_CACHED: >>> - case DRM_IVPU_BO_UNCACHED: >>> case DRM_IVPU_BO_WC: >>> break; >>> default: >>> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/ivpu_accel.h b/include/uapi/drm/ivpu_accel.h >>> index 262db0c3beee..de1944e42c65 100644 >>> --- a/include/uapi/drm/ivpu_accel.h >>> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/ivpu_accel.h >>> @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ struct drm_ivpu_bo_create { >>> * >>> * %DRM_IVPU_BO_UNCACHED: >>> * >>> - * Allocated BO will not be cached on host side nor snooped on the VPU side. >>> + * Not supported. Use DRM_IVPU_BO_WC instead. >>> * >>> * %DRM_IVPU_BO_WC: >>> * >> >> Feels like this will break existing userspace. You could see if userspace >> specified UNCACHED and change it to WC before processing the request. Maybe >> also use WARN_ONCE to indicate that userspace should be updated. >> >> Or is it the case that userspace never actually used this? > > Usage of those buffers was removed some time ago: > https://github.com/intel/linux-vpu-driver/commit/c473c9826cb28fa3dcf8883fc804b1e84c6b5fb1 > > And will not be part of first user-mode driver release. I think we can > safely do the change. Fair enough. Thanks for the clarification. Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@quicinc.com>
diff --git a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_fw.c b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_fw.c index 2fef9fe154aa..8ab0f3225205 100644 --- a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_fw.c +++ b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_fw.c @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ static int ivpu_fw_mem_init(struct ivpu_device *vdev) if (fw->shave_nn_size) { fw->mem_shave_nn = ivpu_bo_alloc_internal(vdev, vdev->hw->ranges.shave.start, - fw->shave_nn_size, DRM_IVPU_BO_UNCACHED); + fw->shave_nn_size, DRM_IVPU_BO_WC); if (!fw->mem_shave_nn) { ivpu_err(vdev, "Failed to allocate shavenn buffer\n"); ret = -ENOMEM; diff --git a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_gem.c b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_gem.c index 915c53d7bb97..2a91eb1e3627 100644 --- a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_gem.c +++ b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_gem.c @@ -89,8 +89,6 @@ static int __must_check shmem_alloc_pages_locked(struct ivpu_bo *bo) if (bo->flags & DRM_IVPU_BO_WC) set_pages_array_wc(pages, npages); - else if (bo->flags & DRM_IVPU_BO_UNCACHED) - set_pages_array_uc(pages, npages); bo->pages = pages; return 0; @@ -366,7 +364,6 @@ ivpu_bo_alloc(struct ivpu_device *vdev, u64 size, u32 flags, const struct ivpu_b switch (flags & DRM_IVPU_BO_CACHE_MASK) { case DRM_IVPU_BO_CACHED: - case DRM_IVPU_BO_UNCACHED: case DRM_IVPU_BO_WC: break; default: diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/ivpu_accel.h b/include/uapi/drm/ivpu_accel.h index 262db0c3beee..de1944e42c65 100644 --- a/include/uapi/drm/ivpu_accel.h +++ b/include/uapi/drm/ivpu_accel.h @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ struct drm_ivpu_bo_create { * * %DRM_IVPU_BO_UNCACHED: * - * Allocated BO will not be cached on host side nor snooped on the VPU side. + * Not supported. Use DRM_IVPU_BO_WC instead. * * %DRM_IVPU_BO_WC: *