Message ID | 20231129152212.7879-1-n.zhandarovich@fintech.ru (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | drm/radeon/r100: Fix integer overflow issues in r100_cs_track_check() | expand |
Applied. Thanks! On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 10:28 AM Nikita Zhandarovich <n.zhandarovich@fintech.ru> wrote: > > It may be possible, albeit unlikely, to encounter integer overflow > during the multiplication of several unsigned int variables, the > result being assigned to a variable 'size' of wider type. > > Prevent this potential behaviour by converting one of the multiples > to unsigned long. > > Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with static > analysis tool SVACE. > > Fixes: 0242f74d29df ("drm/radeon: clean up CS functions in r100.c") > Signed-off-by: Nikita Zhandarovich <n.zhandarovich@fintech.ru> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c > index affa9e0309b2..cfeca2694d5f 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c > @@ -2321,7 +2321,7 @@ int r100_cs_track_check(struct radeon_device *rdev, struct r100_cs_track *track) > switch (prim_walk) { > case 1: > for (i = 0; i < track->num_arrays; i++) { > - size = track->arrays[i].esize * track->max_indx * 4; > + size = track->arrays[i].esize * track->max_indx * 4UL; > if (track->arrays[i].robj == NULL) { > DRM_ERROR("(PW %u) Vertex array %u no buffer " > "bound\n", prim_walk, i); > @@ -2340,7 +2340,7 @@ int r100_cs_track_check(struct radeon_device *rdev, struct r100_cs_track *track) > break; > case 2: > for (i = 0; i < track->num_arrays; i++) { > - size = track->arrays[i].esize * (nverts - 1) * 4; > + size = track->arrays[i].esize * (nverts - 1) * 4UL; > if (track->arrays[i].robj == NULL) { > DRM_ERROR("(PW %u) Vertex array %u no buffer " > "bound\n", prim_walk, i); > -- > 2.25.1 >
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c index affa9e0309b2..cfeca2694d5f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c @@ -2321,7 +2321,7 @@ int r100_cs_track_check(struct radeon_device *rdev, struct r100_cs_track *track) switch (prim_walk) { case 1: for (i = 0; i < track->num_arrays; i++) { - size = track->arrays[i].esize * track->max_indx * 4; + size = track->arrays[i].esize * track->max_indx * 4UL; if (track->arrays[i].robj == NULL) { DRM_ERROR("(PW %u) Vertex array %u no buffer " "bound\n", prim_walk, i); @@ -2340,7 +2340,7 @@ int r100_cs_track_check(struct radeon_device *rdev, struct r100_cs_track *track) break; case 2: for (i = 0; i < track->num_arrays; i++) { - size = track->arrays[i].esize * (nverts - 1) * 4; + size = track->arrays[i].esize * (nverts - 1) * 4UL; if (track->arrays[i].robj == NULL) { DRM_ERROR("(PW %u) Vertex array %u no buffer " "bound\n", prim_walk, i);
It may be possible, albeit unlikely, to encounter integer overflow during the multiplication of several unsigned int variables, the result being assigned to a variable 'size' of wider type. Prevent this potential behaviour by converting one of the multiples to unsigned long. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with static analysis tool SVACE. Fixes: 0242f74d29df ("drm/radeon: clean up CS functions in r100.c") Signed-off-by: Nikita Zhandarovich <n.zhandarovich@fintech.ru> --- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)