diff mbox series

[v4,05/12] drm/ttm: Provide a generic LRU walker helper

Message ID 20240614102548.4364-6-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series TTM shrinker helpers and xe buffer object shrinker | expand

Commit Message

Thomas Hellstrom June 14, 2024, 10:25 a.m. UTC
Provide a generic LRU walker in TTM, in the spirit of drm_gem_lru_scan()
but building on the restartable TTM LRU functionality.

The LRU walker optionally supports locking objects as part of
a ww mutex locking transaction, to mimic to some extent the
current functionality in ttm. However any -EDEADLK return
is converted to -ENOMEM, so that the driver will need to back
off and possibly retry without being able to keep the
ticket.

v3:
- Move the helper to core ttm.
- Remove the drm_exec usage from it for now, it will be
  reintroduced later in the series.
v4:
- Handle the -EALREADY case if ticketlocking.

Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Somalapuram Amaranath <Amaranath.Somalapuram@amd.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c | 145 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h          |  32 +++++++
 2 files changed, 177 insertions(+)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c
index 0b3f4267130c..45fcaf6f8644 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c
@@ -768,3 +768,148 @@  int ttm_bo_pipeline_gutting(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
 	ttm_tt_destroy(bo->bdev, ttm);
 	return ret;
 }
+
+static bool ttm_lru_walk_trylock(struct ttm_lru_walk *walk,
+				 struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
+				 bool *needs_unlock)
+{
+	struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx = walk->ctx;
+
+	*needs_unlock = false;
+
+	if (dma_resv_trylock(bo->base.resv)) {
+		*needs_unlock = true;
+		return true;
+	}
+
+	if (bo->base.resv == ctx->resv && ctx->allow_res_evict) {
+		dma_resv_assert_held(bo->base.resv);
+		return true;
+	}
+
+	return false;
+}
+
+static int ttm_lru_walk_ticketlock(struct ttm_lru_walk *walk,
+				   struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
+				   bool *needs_unlock)
+{
+	struct dma_resv *resv = bo->base.resv;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (walk->ctx->interruptible)
+		ret = dma_resv_lock_interruptible(resv, walk->ticket);
+	else
+		ret = dma_resv_lock(resv, walk->ticket);
+
+	if (!ret) {
+		*needs_unlock = true;
+		/* Only a single ticketlock per loop. */
+		walk->ticket = NULL;
+	} else if (ret == -EDEADLK) {
+		/* Caller needs to exit the ww transaction. */
+		ret = -ENOSPC;
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static void ttm_lru_walk_unlock(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, bool locked)
+{
+	if (locked)
+		dma_resv_unlock(bo->base.resv);
+}
+
+/**
+ * ttm_lru_walk_for_evict() - Perform a LRU list walk, with actions taken on
+ * valid items.
+ * @walk: describe the walks and actions taken
+ * @bdev: The TTM device.
+ * @man: The struct ttm_resource manager whose LRU lists we're walking.
+ * @target: The end condition for the walk.
+ *
+ * The LRU lists of @man are walk, and for each struct ttm_resource encountered,
+ * the corresponding ttm_buffer_object is locked and taken a reference on, and
+ * the LRU lock is dropped. the LRU lock may be dropped before locking and, in
+ * that case, it's verified that the item actually remains on the LRU list after
+ * the lock, and that the buffer object didn't switch resource in between.
+ *
+ * With a locked object, the actions indicated by @walk->process_bo are
+ * performed, and after that, the bo is unlocked, the refcount dropped and the
+ * next struct ttm_resource is processed. Here, the walker relies on
+ * TTM's restartable LRU list implementation.
+ *
+ * Typically @walk->process_bo() would return the number of pages evicted,
+ * swapped or shrunken, so that when the total exceeds @target, or when the
+ * LRU list has been walked in full, iteration is terminated. It's also terminated
+ * on error. Note that the definition of @target is done by the caller, it
+ * could have a different meaning than the number of pages.
+ *
+ * Note that the way dma_resv individualization is done, locking needs to be done
+ * either with the LRU lock held (trylocking only) or with a reference on the
+ * object.
+ *
+ * Return: The progress made towards target or negative error code on error.
+ */
+long ttm_lru_walk_for_evict(struct ttm_lru_walk *walk, struct ttm_device *bdev,
+			    struct ttm_resource_manager *man, long target)
+{
+	struct ttm_resource_cursor cursor;
+	struct ttm_resource *res;
+	long sofar = 0;
+	long lret;
+
+	spin_lock(&bdev->lru_lock);
+	ttm_resource_manager_for_each_res(man, &cursor, res) {
+		struct ttm_buffer_object *bo = res->bo;
+		bool bo_needs_unlock = false;
+		bool bo_locked = false;
+		int mem_type;
+
+		if (!bo || bo->resource != res)
+			continue;
+
+		if (ttm_lru_walk_trylock(walk, bo, &bo_needs_unlock))
+			bo_locked = true;
+		else if ((!walk->ticket) || walk->ctx->no_wait_gpu ||
+			 walk->trylock_only)
+			continue;
+
+		if (!ttm_bo_get_unless_zero(bo)) {
+			ttm_lru_walk_unlock(bo, bo_needs_unlock);
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		mem_type = res->mem_type;
+		spin_unlock(&bdev->lru_lock);
+
+		lret = 0;
+		if (!bo_locked && walk->ticket)
+			lret = ttm_lru_walk_ticketlock(walk, bo, &bo_needs_unlock);
+
+		/*
+		 * Note that in between the release of the lru lock and the
+		 * ticketlock, the bo may have switched resource,
+		 * and also memory type, since the resource may have been
+		 * freed and allocated again with a different memory type.
+		 * In that case, just skip it.
+		 */
+		if (!lret && bo->resource == res && res->mem_type == mem_type)
+			lret = walk->ops->process_bo(walk, bo);
+
+		ttm_lru_walk_unlock(bo, bo_needs_unlock);
+		ttm_bo_put(bo);
+		if (lret == -EBUSY || lret == -EALREADY)
+			lret = 0;
+		sofar = (lret < 0) ? lret : sofar + lret;
+		if (sofar < 0 || sofar >= target)
+			goto out;
+
+		cond_resched();
+		spin_lock(&bdev->lru_lock);
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&bdev->lru_lock);
+out:
+	ttm_resource_cursor_fini(&cursor);
+	return sofar;
+}
diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h
index 6ccf96c91f3a..8b032298d66e 100644
--- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h
+++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h
@@ -190,6 +190,38 @@  struct ttm_operation_ctx {
 	uint64_t bytes_moved;
 };
 
+struct ttm_lru_walk;
+
+/** struct ttm_lru_walk_ops - Operations for a LRU walk. */
+struct ttm_lru_walk_ops {
+	/**
+	 * process_bo - Process this bo.
+	 * @walk: struct ttm_lru_walk describing the walk.
+	 * @bo: A locked and referenced buffer object.
+	 *
+	 * Return: Negative error code on error, Number of processed pages on
+	 * success. 0 also indicates success.
+	 */
+	long (*process_bo)(struct ttm_lru_walk *walk, struct ttm_buffer_object *bo);
+};
+
+/**
+ * struct ttm_lru_walk - Structure describing a LRU walk.
+ */
+struct ttm_lru_walk {
+	/** @ops: Pointer to the ops structure. */
+	const struct ttm_lru_walk_ops *ops;
+	/** @ctx: Pointer to the struct ttm_operation_ctx. */
+	struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx;
+	/** @ticket: The struct ww_acquire_ctx if any. */
+	struct ww_acquire_ctx *ticket;
+	/** @tryock_only: Only use trylock for locking. */
+	bool trylock_only;
+};
+
+long ttm_lru_walk_for_evict(struct ttm_lru_walk *walk, struct ttm_device *bdev,
+			    struct ttm_resource_manager *man, long target);
+
 /**
  * ttm_bo_get - reference a struct ttm_buffer_object
  *