| Message ID | 20250227-amd-display-v1-2-52a060a78d08@ethancedwards.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | drm/amd/display: move from kzalloc(size * nr, ...) to kcalloc(nr, size, ...) | expand |
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/resource/dcn31/dcn31_resource.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/resource/dcn31/dcn31_resource.c index 3c42ba8566cf8b79106de25c9e0aad4a70898ea6..dddddbfef85f8f65a6f76c86cbb6db59d608a74b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/resource/dcn31/dcn31_resource.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/resource/dcn31/dcn31_resource.c @@ -1768,7 +1768,8 @@ bool dcn31_validate_bandwidth(struct dc *dc, int vlevel = 0; int pipe_cnt = 0; - display_e2e_pipe_params_st *pipes = kzalloc(dc->res_pool->pipe_count * sizeof(display_e2e_pipe_params_st), GFP_KERNEL); + display_e2e_pipe_params_st *pipes = kcalloc(dc->res_pool->pipe_count, + sizeof(display_e2e_pipe_params_st), GFP_KERNEL); DC_LOGGER_INIT(dc->ctx->logger); BW_VAL_TRACE_COUNT();
We are trying to get rid of all multiplications from allocation functions to prevent integer overflows. Here the multiplication is probably safe, but using kcalloc() is more appropriate and improves readability. This patch has no effect on runtime behavior. Signed-off-by: Ethan Carter Edwards <ethan@ethancedwards.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/resource/dcn31/dcn31_resource.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)