Message ID | 20250227-amd-display-v1-3-52a060a78d08@ethancedwards.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | drm/amd/display: move from kzalloc(size * nr, ...) to kcalloc(nr, size, ...) | expand |
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/resource/dcn314/dcn314_resource.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/resource/dcn314/dcn314_resource.c index e3ba105034f83434c3e77d343ee267069d34d926..26becc4cb80408cb2778f6af62c7a1c497f06505 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/resource/dcn314/dcn314_resource.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/resource/dcn314/dcn314_resource.c @@ -1704,7 +1704,8 @@ bool dcn314_validate_bandwidth(struct dc *dc, int vlevel = 0; int pipe_cnt = 0; - display_e2e_pipe_params_st *pipes = kzalloc(dc->res_pool->pipe_count * sizeof(display_e2e_pipe_params_st), GFP_KERNEL); + display_e2e_pipe_params_st *pipes = kcalloc(dc->res_pool->pipe_count, + sizeof(display_e2e_pipe_params_st), GFP_KERNEL); DC_LOGGER_INIT(dc->ctx->logger); BW_VAL_TRACE_COUNT();
We are trying to get rid of all multiplications from allocation functions to prevent integer overflows. Here the multiplication is probably safe, but using kcalloc() is more appropriate and improves readability. This patch has no effect on runtime behavior. Signed-off-by: Ethan Carter Edwards <ethan@ethancedwards.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/resource/dcn314/dcn314_resource.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)