diff mbox series

drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_cmd.c:424:6: error: variable 'count' set but not used

Message ID CANiq72mbsAYmR_dRPpQQ=9-NWhTtp0TWiOz0v=V-0AvwYbWw4A@mail.gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_cmd.c:424:6: error: variable 'count' set but not used | expand

Commit Message

Miguel Ojeda March 26, 2024, 6:04 p.m. UTC
Hi,

In today's next, I got:

    drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_cmd.c:424:6: error: variable 'count' set
but not used [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-variable]

`count` seems to be there since commit f64122c1f6ad ("drm: add new QXL
driver. (v1.4)").

Untested diff below -- if you want a formal patch, please let me know.

Cheers,
Miguel

Comments

Maxime Ripard March 27, 2024, 7:59 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi Miguel,

On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 07:04:34PM +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> In today's next, I got:
> 
>     drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_cmd.c:424:6: error: variable 'count' set
> but not used [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> 
> `count` seems to be there since commit f64122c1f6ad ("drm: add new QXL
> driver. (v1.4)").
> 
> Untested diff below -- if you want a formal patch, please let me know.
> 
> Cheers,
> Miguel
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_cmd.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_cmd.c
> index 281edab518cd..d6ea01f3797b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_cmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_cmd.c
> @@ -421,7 +421,6 @@ int qxl_surface_id_alloc(struct qxl_device *qdev,
>  {
>         uint32_t handle;
>         int idr_ret;
> -       int count = 0;
>  again:
>         idr_preload(GFP_ATOMIC);
>         spin_lock(&qdev->surf_id_idr_lock);
> @@ -433,7 +432,6 @@ int qxl_surface_id_alloc(struct qxl_device *qdev,
>         handle = idr_ret;
> 
>         if (handle >= qdev->rom->n_surfaces) {
> -               count++;
>                 spin_lock(&qdev->surf_id_idr_lock);
>                 idr_remove(&qdev->surf_id_idr, handle);
>                 spin_unlock(&qdev->surf_id_idr_lock);
> 

It looks reasonable to me, can you send a formal patch?

Thanks!
Maxime
Miguel Ojeda March 27, 2024, 2:43 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 8:59 AM Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> It looks reasonable to me, can you send a formal patch?

Will do -- I found another one when running the CI with the above one fixed:

    drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_ioctl.c:148:14: error: variable
'num_relocs' set but not used [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-variable]

I will send you one for that too then.

Thanks!

Cheers,
Miguel
Miguel Ojeda March 27, 2024, 6:12 p.m. UTC | #3
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 3:43 PM Miguel Ojeda
<miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Will do -- I found another one when running the CI with the above one fixed:
>
>     drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_ioctl.c:148:14: error: variable
> 'num_relocs' set but not used [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>
> I will send you one for that too then.

Done: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240327175556.233126-1-ojeda@kernel.org/

Cheers,
Miguel
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_cmd.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_cmd.c
index 281edab518cd..d6ea01f3797b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_cmd.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_cmd.c
@@ -421,7 +421,6 @@  int qxl_surface_id_alloc(struct qxl_device *qdev,
 {
        uint32_t handle;
        int idr_ret;
-       int count = 0;
 again:
        idr_preload(GFP_ATOMIC);
        spin_lock(&qdev->surf_id_idr_lock);
@@ -433,7 +432,6 @@  int qxl_surface_id_alloc(struct qxl_device *qdev,
        handle = idr_ret;

        if (handle >= qdev->rom->n_surfaces) {
-               count++;
                spin_lock(&qdev->surf_id_idr_lock);
                idr_remove(&qdev->surf_id_idr, handle);
                spin_unlock(&qdev->surf_id_idr_lock);