Message ID | 20161102090054.6394-1-ddiss@suse.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 10:00:54AM +0100, David Disseldorp wrote: > From: Joao Eduardo Luis <joao@suse.de> > > Add basic CephFS support. No new CephFS specific tests are included, > just basic enablement, with ./check now accepting a -ceph parameter. We don't add command line parameters to specify the filesystem anymore if we can avoid it (they are legacy options, really). Specifying FSTYP=ceph in the environment or config file should be sufficient to do they right thing - does this work for ceph? > @@ -1499,6 +1508,15 @@ _require_scratch_nocheck() > _notrun "this test requires a valid \$SCRATCH_MNT" > fi > ;; > + ceph) > + echo $SCRATCH_DEV | grep -q ":/" > /dev/null 2>&1 > + if [ -z "$SCRATCH_DEV" -o "$?" != "0" ]; then > + _notrun "this test requires a valid \$SCRATCH_DEV" > + fi > + if [ ! -d "$SCRATCH_MNT" ]; then > + _notrun "this test requires a valid \$SCRATCH_MNT" > + fi > + ;; This is the same check as for nfs*). Can you make those common? > cifs) > echo $SCRATCH_DEV | grep -q "//" > /dev/null 2>&1 > if [ -z "$SCRATCH_DEV" -o "$?" != "0" ]; then > @@ -1584,6 +1602,15 @@ _require_test() > _notrun "this test requires a valid \$TEST_DIR" > fi > ;; > + ceph) > + echo $TEST_DEV | grep -q ":/" > /dev/null 2>&1 > + if [ -z "$TEST_DEV" -o "$?" != "0" ]; then > + _notrun "this test requires a valid \$TEST_DEV" > + fi > + if [ ! -d "$TEST_DIR" ]; then > + _notrun "this test requires a valid \$TEST_DIR" > + fi > + ;; Same. Cheers, Dave.
On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 09:17:55 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 10:00:54AM +0100, David Disseldorp wrote: > > From: Joao Eduardo Luis <joao@suse.de> > > > > Add basic CephFS support. No new CephFS specific tests are included, > > just basic enablement, with ./check now accepting a -ceph parameter. > > We don't add command line parameters to specify the filesystem > anymore if we can avoid it (they are legacy options, really). > Specifying FSTYP=ceph in the environment or config file should be > sufficient to do they right thing - does this work for ceph? Yes, seems to work okay for me. > > > @@ -1499,6 +1508,15 @@ _require_scratch_nocheck() > > _notrun "this test requires a valid \$SCRATCH_MNT" > > fi > > ;; > > + ceph) > > + echo $SCRATCH_DEV | grep -q ":/" > /dev/null 2>&1 > > + if [ -z "$SCRATCH_DEV" -o "$?" != "0" ]; then > > + _notrun "this test requires a valid \$SCRATCH_DEV" > > + fi > > + if [ ! -d "$SCRATCH_MNT" ]; then > > + _notrun "this test requires a valid \$SCRATCH_MNT" > > + fi > > + ;; > > This is the same check as for nfs*). Can you make those common? Sure, will fix and resend. Thanks for the feedback Dave. Cheers, David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/README b/README index bc2058d..b1cafe2 100644 --- a/README +++ b/README @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ Running tests: Running all the udf tests: ./check -udf -g udf - for running nfs tests: ./check -nfs [test(s)] - for running cifs/smb3 tests: ./check -cifs [test(s)] + - for running CephFS tests: ./check -ceph [test(s)] - To randomize test order: ./check -r [test(s)] diff --git a/check b/check index 69341d8..adc2347 100755 --- a/check +++ b/check @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ usage() check options -nfs test NFS -cifs test CIFS + -ceph test CephFS -overlay test overlay -tmpfs test TMPFS -l line mode diff @@ -212,6 +213,7 @@ while [ $# -gt 0 ]; do -cifs) FSTYP=cifs ;; -overlay) FSTYP=overlay ;; -tmpfs) FSTYP=tmpfs ;; + -ceph) FSTYP=ceph ;; -g) group=$2 ; shift ; GROUP_LIST="$GROUP_LIST ${group//,/ }" diff --git a/common/config b/common/config index 168f46c..59638d6 100644 --- a/common/config +++ b/common/config @@ -298,6 +298,9 @@ _mount_opts() cifs) export MOUNT_OPTIONS=$CIFS_MOUNT_OPTIONS ;; + ceph) + export MOUNT_OPTIONS=$CEPHFS_MOUNT_OPTIONS + ;; overlay) export MOUNT_OPTIONS=$OVERLAY_MOUNT_OPTIONS ;; @@ -335,6 +338,9 @@ _test_mount_opts() cifs) export TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS=$CIFS_MOUNT_OPTIONS ;; + ceph) + export TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS=$CEPHFS_MOUNT_OPTIONS + ;; *) ;; esac @@ -357,6 +363,9 @@ _mkfs_opts() cifs) export MKFS_OPTIONS=$CIFS_MKFS_OPTIONS ;; + ceph) + export MKFS_OPTIONS=$CEPHFS_MKFS_OPTIONS + ;; reiserfs) export MKFS_OPTIONS="$REISERFS_MKFS_OPTIONS -q" ;; diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc index a84efe4..d057962 100644 --- a/common/rc +++ b/common/rc @@ -147,6 +147,8 @@ case "$FSTYP" in ;; cifs) ;; + ceph) + ;; overlay) ;; reiser4) @@ -705,6 +707,9 @@ _test_mkfs() cifs) # do nothing for cifs ;; + ceph) + # do nothing for ceph + ;; overlay) # do nothing for overlay ;; @@ -791,6 +796,10 @@ _scratch_mkfs() # avoid EEXIST caused by the leftover files created in previous runs _scratch_cleanup_files ;; + ceph) + # Don't re-create CephFS, just remove all files + _scratch_cleanup_files + ;; overlay) # unable to re-create overlay, remove all files in $SCRATCH_MNT to # avoid EEXIST caused by the leftover files created in previous runs @@ -1499,6 +1508,15 @@ _require_scratch_nocheck() _notrun "this test requires a valid \$SCRATCH_MNT" fi ;; + ceph) + echo $SCRATCH_DEV | grep -q ":/" > /dev/null 2>&1 + if [ -z "$SCRATCH_DEV" -o "$?" != "0" ]; then + _notrun "this test requires a valid \$SCRATCH_DEV" + fi + if [ ! -d "$SCRATCH_MNT" ]; then + _notrun "this test requires a valid \$SCRATCH_MNT" + fi + ;; cifs) echo $SCRATCH_DEV | grep -q "//" > /dev/null 2>&1 if [ -z "$SCRATCH_DEV" -o "$?" != "0" ]; then @@ -1584,6 +1602,15 @@ _require_test() _notrun "this test requires a valid \$TEST_DIR" fi ;; + ceph) + echo $TEST_DEV | grep -q ":/" > /dev/null 2>&1 + if [ -z "$TEST_DEV" -o "$?" != "0" ]; then + _notrun "this test requires a valid \$TEST_DEV" + fi + if [ ! -d "$TEST_DIR" ]; then + _notrun "this test requires a valid \$TEST_DIR" + fi + ;; cifs) echo $TEST_DEV | grep -q "//" > /dev/null 2>&1 if [ -z "$TEST_DEV" -o "$?" != "0" ]; then @@ -2658,6 +2685,9 @@ _check_test_fs() cifs) # no way to check consistency for cifs ;; + ceph) + # no way to check consistency for CephFS + ;; overlay) # no way to check consistency for overlay ;; @@ -2702,6 +2732,9 @@ _check_scratch_fs() cifs) # Don't know how to check a CIFS filesystem, yet. ;; + ceph) + # no way to check consistency for CephFS + ;; overlay) # no way to check consistency for overlay ;;