Message ID | 20170728104827.7260-1-jlayton@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 06:48:27AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> > > gfs2 passes the full-scale generic/441 test with the patch that > converts it to use errseq_t reporting for fsync. > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> > --- > tests/generic/441 | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tests/generic/441 b/tests/generic/441 > index 075d87723ca1..b98f709cb6eb 100755 > --- a/tests/generic/441 > +++ b/tests/generic/441 > @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ case $FSTYP in > btrfs) > _notrun "btrfs has a specialized test for this" > ;; > - ext3|ext4|xfs) > + ext3|ext4|gfs2|xfs) gfs2 has no external log device support yet in _scratch_mkfs, so if test still passes with patched gfs2 in this case, I think we can test gfs2 in full-scale mode unconditionally? e.g. ext3|ext4|xfs) # Do the more thorough test if we have a logdev _has_logdev && sflag='' ;; gfs2) # <comments here> sflag='' ;; *) ;; Thanks, Eryu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/tests/generic/441 b/tests/generic/441 index 075d87723ca1..b98f709cb6eb 100755 --- a/tests/generic/441 +++ b/tests/generic/441 @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ case $FSTYP in btrfs) _notrun "btrfs has a specialized test for this" ;; - ext3|ext4|xfs) + ext3|ext4|gfs2|xfs) # Do the more thorough test if we have a logdev _has_logdev && sflag='' ;;