diff mbox series

[RFC,v15,01/21] security: add ipe lsm

Message ID 1710560151-28904-2-git-send-email-wufan@linux.microsoft.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show
Series Integrity Policy Enforcement LSM (IPE) | expand

Commit Message

Fan Wu March 16, 2024, 3:35 a.m. UTC 
From: Deven Bowers <deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com>

Integrity Policy Enforcement (IPE) is an LSM that provides an
complimentary approach to Mandatory Access Control than existing LSMs
today.

Existing LSMs have centered around the concept of access to a resource
should be controlled by the current user's credentials. IPE's approach,
is that access to a resource should be controlled by the system's trust
of a current resource.

The basis of this approach is defining a global policy to specify which
resource can be trusted.

Signed-off-by: Deven Bowers <deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Fan Wu <wufan@linux.microsoft.com>
---
v2:
  + Split evaluation loop, access control hooks,
    and evaluation loop from policy parser and userspace
    interface to pass mailing list character limit

v3:
  + Move ipe_load_properties to patch 04.
  + Remove useless 0-initializations
  + Prefix extern variables with ipe_
  + Remove kernel module parameters, as these are
    exposed through sysctls.
  + Add more prose to the IPE base config option
    help text.
  + Use GFP_KERNEL for audit_log_start.
  + Remove unnecessary caching system.
  + Remove comments from headers
  + Use rcu_access_pointer for rcu-pointer null check
  + Remove usage of reqprot; use prot only.
  + Move policy load and activation audit event to 03/12

v4:
  + Remove sysctls in favor of securityfs nodes
  + Re-add kernel module parameters, as these are now
    exposed through securityfs.
  + Refactor property audit loop to a separate function.

v5:
  + fix minor grammatical errors
  + do not group rule by curly-brace in audit record,
    reconstruct the exact rule.

v6:
  + No changes

v7:
  + Further split lsm creation into a separate commit from the
    evaluation loop and audit system, for easier review.

  + Introduce the concept of an ipe_context, a scoped way to
    introduce execution policies, used initially for allowing for
    kunit tests in isolation.

v8:
  + Follow lsmname_hook_name convention for lsm hooks.
  + Move LSM blob accessors to ipe.c and mark LSM blobs as static.

v9:
  + Remove ipe_context for simplification

v10:
  + Add github url

v11:
  + Correct github url
  + Move ipe before bpf

v12:
  + Switch to use lsm_id instead of string for lsm name

v13:
  + No changes

v14:
  + No changes

v15:
  + Add missing code in tools/testing/selftests/lsm/lsm_list_modules_test.c
---
 MAINTAINERS                                   |  7 ++++
 include/uapi/linux/lsm.h                      |  1 +
 security/Kconfig                              | 11 ++---
 security/Makefile                             |  1 +
 security/ipe/Kconfig                          | 17 ++++++++
 security/ipe/Makefile                         |  9 ++++
 security/ipe/ipe.c                            | 41 +++++++++++++++++++
 security/ipe/ipe.h                            | 16 ++++++++
 security/security.c                           |  3 +-
 .../selftests/lsm/lsm_list_modules_test.c     |  3 ++
 10 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 security/ipe/Kconfig
 create mode 100644 security/ipe/Makefile
 create mode 100644 security/ipe/ipe.c
 create mode 100644 security/ipe/ipe.h
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index a8ea865ecf40..095e55f1a183 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -10710,6 +10710,13 @@  T:	git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/zohar/linux-integrity.git
 F:	security/integrity/
 F:	security/integrity/ima/
 
+INTEGRITY POLICY ENFORCEMENT (IPE)
+M:	Fan Wu <wufan@linux.microsoft.com>
+L:	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
+S:	Supported
+T:	git https://github.com/microsoft/ipe.git
+F:	security/ipe/
+
 INTEL 810/815 FRAMEBUFFER DRIVER
 M:	Antonino Daplas <adaplas@gmail.com>
 L:	linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/lsm.h b/include/uapi/linux/lsm.h
index 33d8c9f4aa6b..938593dfd5da 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/lsm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/lsm.h
@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@  struct lsm_ctx {
 #define LSM_ID_LANDLOCK		110
 #define LSM_ID_IMA		111
 #define LSM_ID_EVM		112
+#define LSM_ID_IPE		113
 
 /*
  * LSM_ATTR_XXX definitions identify different LSM attributes
diff --git a/security/Kconfig b/security/Kconfig
index 412e76f1575d..9fb8f9b14972 100644
--- a/security/Kconfig
+++ b/security/Kconfig
@@ -192,6 +192,7 @@  source "security/yama/Kconfig"
 source "security/safesetid/Kconfig"
 source "security/lockdown/Kconfig"
 source "security/landlock/Kconfig"
+source "security/ipe/Kconfig"
 
 source "security/integrity/Kconfig"
 
@@ -231,11 +232,11 @@  endchoice
 
 config LSM
 	string "Ordered list of enabled LSMs"
-	default "landlock,lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,smack,selinux,tomoyo,apparmor,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_SMACK
-	default "landlock,lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,apparmor,selinux,smack,tomoyo,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_APPARMOR
-	default "landlock,lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,tomoyo,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_TOMOYO
-	default "landlock,lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_DAC
-	default "landlock,lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,selinux,smack,tomoyo,apparmor,bpf"
+	default "landlock,lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,smack,selinux,tomoyo,apparmor,ipe,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_SMACK
+	default "landlock,lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,apparmor,selinux,smack,tomoyo,ipe,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_APPARMOR
+	default "landlock,lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,tomoyo,ipe,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_TOMOYO
+	default "landlock,lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,ipe,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_DAC
+	default "landlock,lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,selinux,smack,tomoyo,apparmor,ipe,bpf"
 	help
 	  A comma-separated list of LSMs, in initialization order.
 	  Any LSMs left off this list, except for those with order
diff --git a/security/Makefile b/security/Makefile
index 59f238490665..cc0982214b84 100644
--- a/security/Makefile
+++ b/security/Makefile
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@  obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_LOCKDOWN_LSM)	+= lockdown/
 obj-$(CONFIG_CGROUPS)			+= device_cgroup.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_LSM)			+= bpf/
 obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK)		+= landlock/
+obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_IPE)		+= ipe/
 
 # Object integrity file lists
 obj-$(CONFIG_INTEGRITY)			+= integrity/
diff --git a/security/ipe/Kconfig b/security/ipe/Kconfig
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e4875fb04883
--- /dev/null
+++ b/security/ipe/Kconfig
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ 
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+#
+# Integrity Policy Enforcement (IPE) configuration
+#
+
+menuconfig SECURITY_IPE
+	bool "Integrity Policy Enforcement (IPE)"
+	depends on SECURITY && SECURITYFS
+	select PKCS7_MESSAGE_PARSER
+	select SYSTEM_DATA_VERIFICATION
+	help
+	  This option enables the Integrity Policy Enforcement LSM
+	  allowing users to define a policy to enforce a trust-based access
+	  control. A key feature of IPE is a customizable policy to allow
+	  admins to reconfigure trust requirements on the fly.
+
+	  If unsure, answer N.
diff --git a/security/ipe/Makefile b/security/ipe/Makefile
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..f7a80d0f18f8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/security/ipe/Makefile
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ 
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#
+# Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
+#
+# Makefile for building the IPE module as part of the kernel tree.
+#
+
+obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_IPE) += \
+	ipe.o \
diff --git a/security/ipe/ipe.c b/security/ipe/ipe.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..b013aed15e73
--- /dev/null
+++ b/security/ipe/ipe.c
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ 
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
+ */
+#include <uapi/linux/lsm.h>
+
+#include "ipe.h"
+
+static struct lsm_blob_sizes ipe_blobs __ro_after_init = {
+};
+
+static const struct lsm_id ipe_lsmid = {
+	.name = "ipe",
+	.id = LSM_ID_IPE,
+};
+
+static struct security_hook_list ipe_hooks[] __ro_after_init = {
+};
+
+/**
+ * ipe_init - Entry point of IPE.
+ *
+ * This is called at LSM init, which happens occurs early during kernel
+ * start up. During this phase, IPE registers its hooks and loads the
+ * builtin boot policy.
+ * Return:
+ * * 0		- OK
+ * * -ENOMEM	- Out of memory
+ */
+static int __init ipe_init(void)
+{
+	security_add_hooks(ipe_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(ipe_hooks), &ipe_lsmid);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+DEFINE_LSM(ipe) = {
+	.name = "ipe",
+	.init = ipe_init,
+	.blobs = &ipe_blobs,
+};
diff --git a/security/ipe/ipe.h b/security/ipe/ipe.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..a1c68d0fc2e0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/security/ipe/ipe.h
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ 
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
+ */
+
+#ifndef _IPE_H
+#define _IPE_H
+
+#ifdef pr_fmt
+#undef pr_fmt
+#endif
+#define pr_fmt(fmt) "IPE: " fmt
+
+#include <linux/lsm_hooks.h>
+
+#endif /* _IPE_H */
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index 7e118858b545..287bfac6b471 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -51,7 +51,8 @@ 
 	(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BPF_LSM) ? 1 : 0) + \
 	(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK) ? 1 : 0) + \
 	(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMA) ? 1 : 0) + \
-	(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EVM) ? 1 : 0))
+	(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EVM) ? 1 : 0) + \
+	(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SECURITY_IPE) ? 1 : 0))
 
 /*
  * These are descriptions of the reasons that can be passed to the
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/lsm/lsm_list_modules_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/lsm/lsm_list_modules_test.c
index 06d24d4679a6..1cc8a977c711 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/lsm/lsm_list_modules_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/lsm/lsm_list_modules_test.c
@@ -128,6 +128,9 @@  TEST(correct_lsm_list_modules)
 		case LSM_ID_EVM:
 			name = "evm";
 			break;
+		case LSM_ID_IPE:
+			name = "ipe";
+			break;
 		default:
 			name = "INVALID";
 			break;