diff mbox series

[13/26] xfs: widen flags argument to the xfs_iflags_* helpers

Message ID 171444680584.957659.3744585033664433370.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series [01/26] xfs: use unsigned ints for non-negative quantities in xfs_attr_remote.c | expand

Commit Message

Darrick J. Wong April 30, 2024, 3:27 a.m. UTC 
From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

xfs_inode.i_flags is an unsigned long, so make these helpers take that
as the flags argument instead of unsigned short.  This is needed for the
next patch.

While we're at it, remove the iflags variable from xfs_iget_cache_miss
because we no longer need it.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Albershteyn <aalbersh@redhat.com>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c |    4 +---
 fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h  |   14 +++++++-------
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Comments

Christoph Hellwig May 1, 2024, 6:54 a.m. UTC | #1 
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 08:27:29PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> 
> xfs_inode.i_flags is an unsigned long, so make these helpers take that
> as the flags argument instead of unsigned short.  This is needed for the
> next patch.
> 
> While we're at it, remove the iflags variable from xfs_iget_cache_miss
> because we no longer need it.

I just reinvented this for another flag in work in progress code.
Can we just get included in the current for-next tree?
Darrick J. Wong May 1, 2024, 10:44 p.m. UTC | #2 
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 11:54:30PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 08:27:29PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> > 
> > xfs_inode.i_flags is an unsigned long, so make these helpers take that
> > as the flags argument instead of unsigned short.  This is needed for the
> > next patch.
> > 
> > While we're at it, remove the iflags variable from xfs_iget_cache_miss
> > because we no longer need it.
> 
> I just reinvented this for another flag in work in progress code.
> Can we just get included in the current for-next tree?

Chandan?  Any thoughts on pushing this for 6.10?

--D
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
index ad93df7a47c1c..f05c6510e94f4 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
@@ -616,7 +616,6 @@  xfs_iget_cache_miss(
 	struct xfs_inode	*ip;
 	int			error;
 	xfs_agino_t		agino = XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(mp, ino);
-	int			iflags;
 
 	ip = xfs_inode_alloc(mp, ino);
 	if (!ip)
@@ -696,13 +695,12 @@  xfs_iget_cache_miss(
 	 * memory barrier that ensures this detection works correctly at lookup
 	 * time.
 	 */
-	iflags = XFS_INEW;
 	if (flags & XFS_IGET_DONTCACHE)
 		d_mark_dontcache(VFS_I(ip));
 	ip->i_udquot = NULL;
 	ip->i_gdquot = NULL;
 	ip->i_pdquot = NULL;
-	xfs_iflags_set(ip, iflags);
+	xfs_iflags_set(ip, XFS_INEW);
 
 	/* insert the new inode */
 	spin_lock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
index 247cff3d75fd7..503ea082dfac4 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
@@ -211,13 +211,13 @@  xfs_new_eof(struct xfs_inode *ip, xfs_fsize_t new_size)
  * i_flags helper functions
  */
 static inline void
-__xfs_iflags_set(xfs_inode_t *ip, unsigned short flags)
+__xfs_iflags_set(xfs_inode_t *ip, unsigned long flags)
 {
 	ip->i_flags |= flags;
 }
 
 static inline void
-xfs_iflags_set(xfs_inode_t *ip, unsigned short flags)
+xfs_iflags_set(xfs_inode_t *ip, unsigned long flags)
 {
 	spin_lock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
 	__xfs_iflags_set(ip, flags);
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@  xfs_iflags_set(xfs_inode_t *ip, unsigned short flags)
 }
 
 static inline void
-xfs_iflags_clear(xfs_inode_t *ip, unsigned short flags)
+xfs_iflags_clear(xfs_inode_t *ip, unsigned long flags)
 {
 	spin_lock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
 	ip->i_flags &= ~flags;
@@ -233,13 +233,13 @@  xfs_iflags_clear(xfs_inode_t *ip, unsigned short flags)
 }
 
 static inline int
-__xfs_iflags_test(xfs_inode_t *ip, unsigned short flags)
+__xfs_iflags_test(xfs_inode_t *ip, unsigned long flags)
 {
 	return (ip->i_flags & flags);
 }
 
 static inline int
-xfs_iflags_test(xfs_inode_t *ip, unsigned short flags)
+xfs_iflags_test(xfs_inode_t *ip, unsigned long flags)
 {
 	int ret;
 	spin_lock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@  xfs_iflags_test(xfs_inode_t *ip, unsigned short flags)
 }
 
 static inline int
-xfs_iflags_test_and_clear(xfs_inode_t *ip, unsigned short flags)
+xfs_iflags_test_and_clear(xfs_inode_t *ip, unsigned long flags)
 {
 	int ret;
 
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@  xfs_iflags_test_and_clear(xfs_inode_t *ip, unsigned short flags)
 }
 
 static inline int
-xfs_iflags_test_and_set(xfs_inode_t *ip, unsigned short flags)
+xfs_iflags_test_and_set(xfs_inode_t *ip, unsigned long flags)
 {
 	int ret;