Message ID | 5650c4ed-cec0-d11e-4f68-1661b3638786@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | tests: mark as passing with SANITIZE=leak | expand |
Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com> writes: > This is the second version of this series. However, a subset of the > patches from the first version have already been merged to 'next'. > Therefore, those are not included here. > > These are the rest of them, which address Peff's reviews. Thanks!
On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 01:27:47AM +0200, Rubén Justo wrote: > This is the second version of this series. However, a subset of the > patches from the first version have already been merged to 'next'. > Therefore, those are not included here. > > These are the rest of them, which address Peff's reviews. These all look good to me. I'd probably have split the config.c refactor into its own commit, but I don't think it's worth going back for. Thanks Rubén for fixing these! -Peff
On 17/6/23 7:48, Jeff King wrote: > These all look good to me. I'd probably have split the config.c refactor > into its own commit That's a good point. I'll send the refactor when the dust settles, along with a revision for the UNLEAK(). Thank you!