Message ID | pull.1506.v2.git.git.1683839975.gitgitgadget@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | docs: interpret-trailers: reword and add examples | expand |
"Linus Arver via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes: > This series makes some small improvements to the docs for > git-interpret-trailers. The intent is to make it easier to read for > beginners who have never used this command before. > > > Changes from v1 > =============== > > In order of significance: > > * The phrase "commit message part" has been removed. > * The word "message" is always used as part of the bigger phrase "commit > message". > * Deprecation language for trailer.<token>.command has been updated to > minimize whitespace churn, while also tweaking the 2nd paragraph to > reduce duplication. > * The phrase "Lorem ipsum..." is always only used to stand in for the body > paragraph(s) of a commit message. > * Grammar fixes have been squashed together (01+06 previously). Looking very good. Unfortunately some of the updates to examples overlap moderately with what the kh/doc-interpret-trailers-updates topic wanted to do. I think I resolved them correctly, but please double check what appears in 'seen'. As the other topic is slated to graduate in a day or two (topics usually cook for a week in 'next' before merged to 'master'), it may be a good idea to wait for more review comments and then rebase these patches on top of 'master' when that happens. Thanks.
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes: > Looking very good. > Unfortunately some of the updates to examples overlap moderately > with what the kh/doc-interpret-trailers-updates topic wanted to do. > I think I resolved them correctly, but please double check what > appears in 'seen'. I don't think I can double-check 'seen' in a timely manner (see "FYI" below). > As the other topic is slated to graduate in a day or two (topics > usually cook for a week in 'next' before merged to 'master'), it > may be a good idea to wait for more review comments and then rebase > these patches on top of 'master' when that happens. Will do. Thanks for the tip! FYI: I am currently on vacation (in hindsight I should have mentioned this ahead of time) and won't be back until June 5. Still, I am highly interested in seeing how my topic branch evolves (along with the interactions with 'seen', 'next', etc) so I will at least have a look time to time before my official @work return date to see if I can rebase this topic on master when it (master) moves.
Linus Arver <linusa@google.com> writes: > FYI: I am currently on vacation (in hindsight I should have mentioned > this ahead of time) and won't be back until June 5. Still, I am highly > interested in seeing how my topic branch evolves (along with the > interactions with 'seen', 'next', etc) so I will at least have a look > time to time before my official @work return date to see if I can rebase > this topic on master when it (master) moves. Thanks. FYI, we will go into a pre-release feature freeze when no new "features" or "fixes" will graduate to the 'master' branch, unless it is a regression fix to the change that happened between 2.40 and 'master'. As the next release is planned for the beginning of June, your vacation would coincide well with back-burnering the topic ;-) Have fun.